Present: Present: Mike, Mary, Carol, Terry, Chris, Doreen
Security team members: Nate, Ian, David, Travis, Rick
The Security Team joined us with an update on recent activities, Continue reading
Present: Present: Mike, Mary, Carol, Terry, Chris, Doreen
Security team members: Nate, Ian, David, Travis, Rick
The Security Team joined us with an update on recent activities, Continue reading
Present: Mike Roy, Terry Simpkins, Chris Norris, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus and Doreen Bernier
This month’s all-LIS Staff meeting will be canceled. Mike will talk with Sheila Andrus about holding a workshop allowing LIS staff to participate in exercises taken from management training sessions. The first will be on giving and receiving feedback.
Continue reading
Present: Mike Roy, Terry Simpkins, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus, Chris Norris, Doreen Bernier
We discussed College-wide content management issues around with the website. Carol will continue the discussion with the Web Editorial Group (through College Communications). Continue reading
Present: Mike Roy, Terry Simpkins, Carol Peddie, Chris Norris and Mary Backus
Guests: Mary Stanley, Joseph Watson (1st item only)
Today’s meeting began with a tour of 118 Main Street. Mary Stanley took us through the newly renovated building, which could possibly serve as office space for LIS staff. Continue reading
Present: Mike Roy, Shel Sax, Terry Simpkins, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus, Doreen Bernier
Guests: Tim Spears, Brenda Ellis, Carrie Macfarlane
Tim Spears joined us this morning to for the final stop on the “listening tour” that he and Mike have been holding with LIS workgroups to discuss the outcome of the Staff Council survey. Continue reading
Senior Leadership Team Notes
December 16, 2011
Present: Mike Roy, Chris Norris, Shel Sax, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus, Terry Simpkins and Doreen Bernier
We discussed two change management proposals. Web server maintenance is scheduled for Sunday morning, Dec. 18th and the following systems will be affected.
These systems will not go down, but editing and changes will not be saved during this time frame. An email to the community will be sent out in advance.
Present: Mike Roy, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus, Terry Simpkins, Chris Norris, Doreen Bernier
Guest: Joe Antonioli
Joe Antonioli presented the Curricular Technology Team report on the decommissioning of Segue which proposed a timeline for shutdown and migration of current faculty sites. Continue reading
Present: Mike Roy, Terry Simpkins, Carol Peddie, Mary Backus, Chris Norris, Shel Sax
Guests: Ian Burke, Jim Stuart
Absent: Doreen
Jim and Ian joined us to discuss the proposal to migrate our anti-virus solution to Sophos. The project team working on this consists of Brian Foley, Chris Tangora, Petar Mitrevski, Rick James, Jim, and Ian. We reviewed the draft change management form, and the SLT requested 1) more detail specifying where the responsibility lies for each step in the process and b) . Ultimately, most of the work involves testing and deployment; the impact on end-users should be minimal. We also discussed how the timing of the project might be impacted by other major projects such as the Banner migration and the roll-out of the new Network Access Control system. We agreed that testing should be done in January, and, assuming the testing goes smoothly, roll-out should occur in February.
Mike presented an idea for an upcoming decisions list. The idea is to provide transparency regarding proposed ideas and projects, and to give a sense of the direction in which LIS is moving. After some discussion, we agreed that this might be best tied into the our goals page on the strategic planning site and, like the goals, updated on a quarterly basis.
Next up, we talked about the LIS values statements we created roughly 3 years ago, and how these relate to some of the feedback we heard from the staff survey. We agreed that we should revisit our values, focusing on whether or not we have articulated the “right” set for LIS, as well as whether or not we live up to them as an organization. We have also had enough staff turnover in recent years to warrant a re-examination of these values statements. We agreed that each director will have discussions with their managers about ways to solicit input for refining or revising our values statements, and that we’ll continue the discussion once those discussions have occurred.
We began a discussion about the defining the parameters of the Google/MSLive evaluation that Shel will be leading. We ran out of time for this piece, and will continue on 11/18 at our monthly retreat.
Thanks for reading,
Terry