Fake It ‘Til You Make It

By Diana Wilkinson

 

I’m still caught off guard when I’m served mint chocolate chip ice cream and it’s not green. You would think because mint leaves are green it would make green ice cream, isn’t that why it’s green most of the time?

It’s fairly obvious to me now, but that bright green color is just added to look appealing–that’s the only purpose, color! You can also find this fake coloring in pickles, salad dressing, and so many more everyday food products.

In the Nabhan Ted Talk, she mentions a synthetic grain that’s gaining popularity. It looks like the real thing. Tastes like the real thing. But she says no matter how similar it seems we cannot fool our bodies.

Real foods have superior nutrition, taste and are often have less impact on the planet. Instead of trying to replicate sweetness or bright colors, the average consumer should instead look for the simplest ingredients and work to make those accessible to everyone.

Someone, somewhere had the ingenious idea to instead NOT add the food coloring, and I think it’s representative of a greater trend in the food system. People don’t want synthetic dyes and will choose to alternatively eat more natural products.

Kraft even announced it’s famous macaroni and cheese would take out the almost iconic, unnatural orange color!

If a large company like Kraft is making these changes as a result of consumer demand, I have faith consumers will eventually drive the market away from the processed to the whole and real foods.

 

Eat to Live: Live to Eat

By Diana Wilkinson

Some people eat to live while others live to eat. It’s an expression I’ve heard hundreds of times, and reflects what I view as a flawed mentality surrounding food in current American culture. The act of eating should be more than to sustain life and less than an all consuming time-suck.

“Much of our present debate on the state of the contemporary food system….is grounded in two powerful American cultural values,” according to Trubeck. “First that talking and caring about food above and beyond its mere sustenance value are improper, and second, that every american deserves a chicken in his or her pot.”

Food simply isn’t as cherished here compared to other places. Caring about your food isn’t something we value. When I lived in Italy, the locals saw food is art, a source of community, and a sacred cultural tradition worth preserving.

Once I ate a slice of pizza while walking to the bus and people looked at me like I was walking backwards with my shoes tied together. I shudder to think what they would think if they knew about one of five meals is eaten in a car.

On the other hand, Americans do feel a strong sense of responsibility to ensure everyone has food, but how much good does that do if the food lacks nutritional value. Eating processed and unhealthy food may be better than nothing, but it may not make people feel good and lead to serious health problems down the road.

Maybe these two deeply entrenched cultural values are in part what lead to the pervasiveness of fast food in American society. The cheapness of fast food has made is so no one goes hungry–or at least it appears that way.
I do believe Americans are starting to become increasingly and unapologetically mindful of the food they consume. Hopefully, that will translate to those of every income and we can start to become a better fed nation.

Lean In…To a Better Food System

By Diana Wilkinson

Sixty percent of the world’s hungry are women according to the FAO–and if you add children into the mix that number climbs to about 80 percent. A number like that is not only hard to forget but also reinforces how the current food system is institutionally flawed.

Ironically enough, women also grow 80 percent of the food in developing countries despite the major societal barriers. Often women do not have the same ability to own land, visit markets, make vital agricultural purchases as the men in their countries.

They are typically responsible for other incredibly time consuming ventures like childcare, cooking and fetching water, which can be   incredibly dangerous in some places.

“Food sovereignty is about an end to all forms of violence against women,” said writer and activist Raj Patel, “The way that capitalism works today is that it demands a subsidy of women’s work, especially women’s work in the home. Women’s work is often unpaid and contributes to well over half of the output of the world’s economy.”

Addressing gender equality issues around the globe and even domestically is paramount when trying combat issues of hunger. It’s estimated that if those women in developing nations had equal access to resources 150 million fewer people in the world would go hungry.
Even in the United States, changing the very structures the food system was built upon, in regards to gender and race are what needs to happen if we desire lasting change. Instead of ignoring those crucial factors and collectively working to create more of a level playing field we can truly begin to create a fair food system

Could Fast Food Be Used for Good?

By Diana Wilkinson

I’m no stranger to eating on the run. During the school year, I would often ask someone to cover for at work me while I ran to grab a slice of pizza or buy a salad from a store near by and then eat it at my desk. I would bring sandwiches to class for dinner and hoped to finish eating before lecture started. When you have one too many commitments in a day, carving out time to make and slowly eat food just isn’t a priority.

I am incredibly privileged and can afford the kind of “fast-casual” food that is much healthier than a Big Mac and fries, but at the same time can be purchased and eaten quickly. It may not be greasy “traditional” fast food, but there a lot of similarities.

Even though the nutritional value of fast food is horrific, the idea behind fast-food  may not be so wrong. It certainly fills a need in American society. I’m not saying it’s the best way to eat, but I certainly understand the popularity of it.

If you are tired from a long day of work, hungry and don’t have the means to pay for a prepared healthy meal, it makes a lot of sense that a consumer would go for something like a sandwich at Subway.Think about it, if you have a family of five and can buy a filling meal everyone enjoys for less than $30, you might even go there more than once a week!

Many Americans face the dilemma about what to eat, and as Schlosser mentioned, “on any given day in the U.S. about one-quarter of the adult population visits a fast food restaurant.” p.3 What if there was a fast-food style restaurant that was maybe a little bit more expensive but provided healthy alternatives to breaded chicken and cheese burgers. I would like to think that something like that could become as big as McDonald’s.

I’ve already seen smaller chains focused on healthier foods starting to crop up, but they cost a substantial amount more than traditional fast food. Could be get to a point where vegetables were made so efficiently that almost anyone could have access to them? If it tasted good, was filling, fast and cheap. I think it could be an extremely popular restaurant.

Also in terms of the workforce, about 1 in 6 people in America have at some point worked at a McDonalds, what would happen if those positions became higher paid and the employees received greater benefits. Starbucks even announced they would pay for community college for its employees.

Instead of trying to completely end all fast food, it might be time to look at why we have such a need for it and adapt the system that is already in place. People enjoy healthy foods too, and making meals accessible with the convenience and low price point of fast food could revolutionize the broken and unhealthy system in place today.

“You are What You Eat Eats Too”

cow in field(Courtesy of Petr Kratochvil)

The first time I drove through Vermont, every road felt picturesque. Rust-colored barns, grain silos and animals grazing in the grassy pastures reminded me of the classic American farm consistently depicted in paintings, films and other media. I’d like to believe all livestock lived on farms like the one I saw and had a similar diet, but unfortunately I know that’s not the reality.

The majority of cattle raised for meat and milk production is kept in feedlots and receive grain instead of grass for sustenance. While this alteration might seem like an inconsequential change-up, it can actually impact the nutritional benefits, quality of life for the animal and the final product.

According to the Washington Post, cows fed exclusively grass will have higher concentrations of vitamins A and E and contain less fat. In fact, omega-3 levels will be almost 50 percent higher in grass-fed beef.

The same holds true for milk. “Grass-only” and organic milk also have higher levels of omega-3s and the market has been steadily growing for it—despite its greater price tag.

“Grass-only” milk, the cows receive an almost exclusively grass diet, and in order for milk to receive a USDA certified organic label, the cows must get least 30 percent of their diet from grass and graze for more than 120 days a year in a pasture.

If you are a beef-eater, the taste of exclusively grass-fed meat may be better too. Some have said it can be chewier, but it will maintain a superior flavor compared to other types of grain fed cows.

The taste and added nutrients aren’t the only benefits from a grassier diet. If animals, like cows, are fed too much seed they will become sick and require antibiotics, according to Michael Polan. Low-dose antibiotics used in feed to ward off infection can lead to antibiotic resistant bacteria and substantial public health issues.

There is, however, some debate over whether or not a feed-based diet is better for the planet. Beef production all in all is not environmentally friendly.  In the United States about 30 million cattle were slaughtered in 2014 alone, and raising those cows creates a substantial amount of methane.

Some argue raising cows in feedlots allows can help manage the methane, but it’s unclear if it actually makes a substantial difference in the environment. Either way, the best way to help the environment would be to consumer less animal products altogether. There may also be some health benefits associated with a diet with more veggies and less meat.

Overall, it’s almost no question that eating a healthier diet makes us healthier, so why shouldn’t the same hold true for cows? If a diet of too much grain and seeds can make cows and can even make them sick, shouldn’t that be a red flag for a consumer? To me, paying the premium for grass fed is worth it.