Tags » Editors Choice

 
 
 

The Envelope Please…

Categories: Midd Blogosphere

Aw shucks. Middlebury Magazine has just learned that we’ve been honored with awards for design, editorial, and general excellence by the fine (and may we say wise) judges in the 2011 Circle of Excellence Awards, which is sponsored by the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education.

Our winning entries:

College and University General Interest Magazines: 30,000 to 74,999 circ. (40 entries)
Bronze, Middlebury Magazine, Winter 2010 and Fall 2010 issues

Excellence in Design: Illustrations (28 entries)
Silver,
“Long Live the Great White Yak,” illustration by Emiliano Ponzi
Silver, “Brain vs. Nature,” illustration by Heads of State

Excellence in Design: Editorial Design (65 entries)
Silver, “Can the Louisiana Coast Be Saved?” art direction by Pamela Fogg, design by Carey Bass ’99

Best Articles of the Year: Higher Education (107 entries)
Silver, “Hollowed Ground,” by Sierra Crane-Murdoch ’10



In Other Words

Categories: Midd Blogosphere

On the classroom screen, TV journalist David Frost introduces guest Julian Assange and asks the beleaguered Wikileaks cofounder about extradition threats, leak sources, and conflicts between governments and journalists.

The 16 students scribbling notes aren’t preparing to analyze issues of free speech and national security. Instead, each is figuring how to interpret this conversation to a speaker of a target language. Within the classroom are native speakers of French, Russian, and Bengali, and the American students have brought their advanced skills in Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. This is “Introduction to Translation Studies” and it isn’t just the overall J-term Gestalt that lends it a different feel.

For one, this is the first Middlebury undergrad class to focus on translation and interpretation (T&I) theory and practice instead of the workings of a particular language. (The primary difference between translation and interpretation? Text versus speech.) It’s also part of a recently launched minor in linguistics with expansion potential via collaboration with the Monterey Institute for International Studies (MIIS). The teacher, a seasoned professional translator and interpreter, Karin Hanta, is more familiar to the Middlebury campus as director of Chellis House, the home of many women’s and gender studies activities. A native of Austria, Hanta speaks five languages, has lived and worked on three continents, is a doctoral candidate in translation studies, has translated several books on topics such as Holocaust biography and German philosophy, and has written a dozen travel books for major German publishing houses to boot.

Questions arise as each student paraphrases Frost’s and Assange’s comments in English and then translates them: “I’m not sure whether Arabic would use ‘summit’ for a meeting,” says one. “OK, try and talk your way around it; could you use ‘conference’? ” prompts Hanta. “I don’t know the German for ‘extradition,’” says another. “Auslieferung,” Hanta offers. Each student evaluates his or her own progress with the translation; Hanta can fill in vocabulary for German, French, Portuguese, and Spanish, and fellow students of Chinese and Arabic also offer feedback. It’s not a language class, however, so the point is the process.

Hanta wanted to interest students in translation studies through a balance of practical issues, such as copyright and remuneration, and relevant scholarship. The view of the translator’s role has shifted since her own fascination with T&I began years ago. “Scholars often held that the translator should be invisible, subservient to the source text,” she notes. “Newer theories ‘dethrone’ the source and ask, ‘What’s the target text supposed to accomplish?’”

When those “texts” are advertising copy, the translator is expected to marshal marketing and cultural ken that will encourage business in the target country. Discussion of this growing field, “localization management,” gave Hanta one of several opportunities to bring MIIS experts into the class via Skype and videoconference. MIIS alumni are active in this area, translating for Apple and Microsoft, among others, making sure that a software icon makes sense in Russian and a technology term strikes the right note in Portuguese.

“Monterey’s a real gem, one of the best institutions at which to train for this work,” says Hanta, noting that career opportunities are burgeoning. It’s a point not lost on her students, several of whom entered the class considering T&I careers, and now feel they know where to go for personal advice and further training. And they’ve got a head start on the skills they’ll need. As Hanta says at the end of the Frost-Assange exercise, “What you’ve just done took me a couple of years of training.”


The World According to Irving

Categories: Midd Blogosphere

Not many things will distract the more diligent Middlebury students from their midterm exams, but thankfully an internationally famous author is one of them.

When John Irving stepped up to meet the crowd in Mead Chapel this past Wednesday evening, his good humor, casual plaid-shirted presence and magnetic narrative style made all else slip away for a good part of the following hour. A core audience of students, as well as other campus and community members, enjoyed a mix of personal musings, historical perspective and even a little political rallying along with the highly engaging reading from the author’s current book in progress.

Though he didn’t realize it, Irving was pleased to be reminded during the welcoming comments by Chellis House director Karin Hanta that this is National Coming Out Month, a notable celebration given the recent media focus on bullying and homophobia among young people. The reading, co-sponsored by the Women’s and Gender Studies Program, the Creative Writing Program, the Department of English and American Literatures, Wonnacott Commons, and the Office of the Dean of the College, dovetailed meaningfully with some of the current issues on people’s minds. Irving often interlaces themes of sexuality and prejudice throughout his novels, and spoke passionately about the fundamental right for people to be accepted, tolerated and welcomed for who they are, no matter what the differences among us may be.

Irving’s writing—he has published 12 novels with his 13th underway—has always embraced the normality of difference. As example, he recalled for the Mead audience characters such a Frank Berry from Hotel New Hampshire and John Wheelwright from A Prayer for Owen Meany, among many others who have questioned or confronted their sexuality. His latest narrator is a bisexual man looking back on his formative childhood and sexual awakening via a local librarian, Miss Frost, who is later revealed to be transgender. The unfinished novel’s working title, In One Person is a reference to Shakespeare’s “Richard II,” when in Act V, Scene V, the protagonist says, “Thus play I in one person many people/And none contented.”

With a voice both breathy and expressive yet clipped and direct, Irving brought these new characters to life—the unguarded boyishness of young Billy, the crisp aloofness of the aptly named woman. The issues at hand were deeply serious; the writing—and Irving’s delivery—was unabashedly humorous. When asked later in the Q&A about his habit of blending humor and tragedy, Irving said, “You can’t choose to be funny or not—you either are or you’re not. But the downside is that you also can’t control when it comes out. When you know something really bad is going to happen—and I always do because I am a methodical planner of my plots—sometimes you just can’t help but make a little joke of it.”

Speaking of his methodical plotting, Irving was straightforward and clear about his writing style as a process, almost to the point of being a science. “I always write the ending first,” he explained. “I need to know where I’m going, which probably hearkens back to my early and ongoing influence by such character- and plot-driven writers as Dickens and Hardy. Now that’s not to say that the ending I write can’t change,” he added with a telltale grin. “But it hasn’t yet in 12 novels, so don’t hold your breath.” In fact, he even began his excerpt from In One Person by reading the last line of the chapter first—“So you’ll know when it’s over,” he deadpanned. But in doing so, in all seriousness, he clearly wanted the audience to know—and feel the process of knowing—exactly where we were going.

Irving was first published in 1968, with Setting Free the Bears. Though his career began slowly, he received immediate worldwide attention in 1980 with The World According to Garp. He has won the National Book Award, an O. Henry Award and an Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay for The Cider House Rules. He’s no stranger to success, and yet he presented himself that evening in Mead as just another writer diligently—and daily—honing his craft.

After his reading, he took questions from the audience. Though he was fond of beginning with a deceivingly short answer—“yes,” “no,” “both”—there was no stopping the author on a roll of elaboration. When a question arose regarding his experience with control issues on the movie adaptations of his books, Irving took a wide tangential turn to politics and in the process expressed his support for Vermont Democratic gubernatorial candidate Peter Shumlin, adding that “if you care about people who care about respecting sexual differences, then don’t vote for Brian Dubie.” Not minding at all that he seemed to have wavered off topic, the crowd responded with a healthy round of applause. And, to his credit, Irving adroitly managed to bring the whole thing back around and satisfy the questioner by saying, “Basically, it’s a two-way street: I respect you, you respect me, and together we can collaborate on something really great.”

Following questions, and nearly 90 minutes after his introduction, Irving enthusiastically moved toward the front of Mead to sign books for a growing line of fans. Seated with pen in hand for nearly 30 minutes, John Irving carefully took each offering, whether a crisp new book just purchased or a tattered paperback from years ago, and signed them all with characteristic style and aplomb.


Midd Meets Hockenberry

Categories: Midd Blogosphere

Journalist John Hockenberry, this year’s inaugural speaker in the Institute for Working Journalism’s “Meet the Press” series, spoke about the Tea Party movement in America through a lens that most people in the audience had not considered.

But before he revealed what that lens would be, Hockenberry said on October 5 that journalists today need to do more than just report on current events. They need to study history, draw comparisons, and place events in a context “so they can be understood as an outgrowth of historical narratives and traditions and almost rituals in American democratic life.”

Then the four-time Emmy Award-winning commentator asked the audience, “Does anyone have some change in their pocket? A penny, perhaps?”

Bound to a wheelchair since he was a teenager, the 54-year-old host of Public Radio International’s morning news program “The Takeaway” shunned the lectern during his 40-minute talk—which felt more like an unscripted conversation than a formal lecture—and during nearly an hour of questions and answers that followed.

Listen to Hockenberry talk for two minutes about how he sees journalism today

After a few audience members pulled out their one-cent pieces, Hockenberry remarked how ironic it was that Lincoln should end up on the copper penny. Why? Because the Copperhead movement was Lincoln’s nemesis for most of his presidency, he said. Also known as the Peace Democrats, the Copperheads opposed the Civil War and advocated restoration of the Union. They controlled the 1864 Democratic national convention and inserted a plank declaring the war a failure. Particularly strong in the Midwest where many families had Southern roots, the Copperheads controlled one chamber in the Illinois Legislature, blocked a bill in Indiana state government, and even saw their candidate, Horatio Seymour, elected governor of New York. (New York’s Seymour should not be confused with our Horatio Seymour, the Middlebury resident and United States senator who lived during the same time.)

“The discourse of the Copperhead movement was very much like the Tea Party movement of today,” Hockenberry said. He cited the typical anti-Lincoln rhetoric: “The war is destroying us”; “Government is growing too fast”; “Too many taxes”; and “Go back to the way it was.” For each slogan from the 1860s, Hockenberry drew an analogy to the Tea Party’s rhetoric about the war in Afghanistan, the TARP program, the size of the federal deficit, and the desire for freedom.

Lincoln imprisoned one Copperhead leader, Clement L. Vallandigham of Ohio, in an act that Hockenberry said would be akin to President Obama putting Glenn Beck in Sing Sing to silence him today.

In the 1864 presidential election, the Democratic Party’s candidate was Union General George B. McClellan, whom Lincoln had removed from command of the Army of the Potomac two years earlier. From this historical event Hockenberry drew a comparison to Barack Obama’s recent removal of General Stanley McChrystal as commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

As November neared, Lincoln’s re-election was very much in doubt. The Copperheads won some primary elections, which Hockenberry likened to the Tea Party’s recent success in Republican primaries. But then what happened? On September 2, 1864, the North won the Battle of Atlanta and the tide of war turned. A Union victory was assured and Lincoln gained credibility. He won re-election handily.

At this point Hockenberry looked around the room and inquired, “What will be the Fall of Atlanta moment that will propel Obama to office in 2012?” Capturing Osama bin Laden? Strengthening the economy? A decisive military victory in the Middle East?

“Does Barack Obama need a Fall of Atlanta moment?” Hockenberry asked. “And perhaps the Fall of Atlanta deprived us of seeing what would have happened to Lincoln. In a way, the 2012 presidential election for Barack Obama will be the conclusion to a story that Lincoln knew in 1864.”

And with that the guest speaker opened the floor to questions. Erudite and patient, he responded to questions about his coverage of the Gulf War and Kosovo War, key races in November 2010, journalism as his form of civic engagement, and the need for contextualization in reporting today, which was exactly what he did for the Tea Party movement during the first half of his program.


Actors Among Scholars

Categories: Midd Blogosphere, video

Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? The answer, hopefully, is “no one” after they’ve heard professional actors do a dramatic reading from Mrs. Dalloway that brings the famously challenging text to life. This scene played out recently at the Bread Loaf School of English summer session in Ripton, Vt. The in-class reading was one of nearly 50 that took place this summer—along with a fully staged production of Caryl Churchill’s play Mad Forest. As theater program director Alan MacVey explains, theater is an integral part of this summer graduate program, which is geared toward secondary school teachers. “I know that we have changed the way many of these students teach Hamlet or MacBeth,” says MacVey.