Tags » research

 
 
 

Review of Technology in Education Sites

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

To help us create a section of the LIS site on Curricular Technology, I thought it would be good to see how other institutions publish comparable information.  What we are currently calling “curricular technology” is described in various ways including “instructional technology“, “educational technology,” “academic technology,” and “technologies for teaching, learning and research.”  What all of these labels have in common is seems to be the use of technology in education.

More

Surveys and Focus Groups

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

Clearly both surveys and focus groups are important tools for gathering information about a particular population.  Usually surveys are used first, to a get general sense of the population.  Surveys are then followed by focus groups that get more in depth information.

However a case can be made for reversing this order and starting with focus groups first, followed by surveys (see: “Use of Focus Groups in Survey Item Development“, The Qualitative Report, Nassar and Borders, March, 2002).  Focus groups can often help to define survey questions or inform how questions are phrased.  This can be particularly important for technology surveys, helping to couch questions in terms that those surveyed can understand.

Meeting Notes 2009-09-01

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

This meeting focused on brainstorming about the use of curricular technologies at Middlebury in terms of:

  • What we know about how faculty/students are using curricular technologies now
  • What we need to verify about their technology usage
  • What we don’t know about what faculty/students want or need in terms of curricular technologies now and/or in the future

More

Reseach: Twitter plugins for WordPress

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

The Helpdesk received a request for a WordPress Twitter plugin.  If we decide it would be good to have such a plugin, what kind of functionality would useful for the Midd community.  See:

http://blueprintds.com/2009/01/19/top-twitter-wordpress-plugin-roundup/

http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/twitter-tools/

http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/04/10-best-twitter-tools-for-wordpress-blogs/

Research: What is exported from a WordPress blog?

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

What gets saved when you export a WordPress blog?  I know the format of the export file is XML and that all posts, pages, categories and authors are exported.  See:

http://support.wordpress.com/moving-a-blog/

Not sure if files, sidebar settings, themes or roles can be exported….  There are tools that exist to migrate WordPress blog to other platforms, but not all or perhaps any of them will migrate files…

WordPress to Drupal

There are two main modules for migrating WordPress content to Drupal, see:

http://drupal.org/project/wp2drupal

http://drupal.org/project/wordpress_import/

WP2Drupal interacts directly with the database, whereas WordPress_Import uses the WXR export file.  It is not clear whether these migration modules also migrate WordPress files.  There is Drupal code out there for migrating files on a remote server to Drupal, see:
http://bensangeorge.com/2009/06/drupal-bits-migrating-remote-files-in-drupal/

It also looks like Drupal is working on a migration framework, see:
http://drupal.org/project/migrate

Research: FirstClass in Education

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

Wellesley College uses FirstClass and its has extensive documentation on how to use it.

Educause Web Seminar on Selecting and Implementing a Course Management System for Your Campus

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

The Educause Live! series has a web seminar on Selecting and Implementing a Course Management System for Your Campus on August 5th from 1-2 pm.

(Thanks Joy for passing on this link)

Towards a better Features Matrix

Categories: LIS Staff Interest

A common approach to choosing a technology solution is to create a “feature matrix” which lists all the features required and numerical rates or weights each solution’s implementation of that feature.  The best solution is then that one with the highest “score.”

For a good critique of this strategy see: CMS Selection – Death to the Features Matrix.  This article suggests another approach, that of listing “doubts” regarding the importance of features or a solution’s implementation of a feature.