Panel: Finding Meaning

The main idea of the panel was to discuss the complicated issue of global health. The first speaker was Katherine Ott, a curator at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC.  She argued how culture relates to the issue of public health. Ott says, “We live in a world surrounded by stuff,” referring to the material objects that control and manipulate our society. She discusses the fact that medicine has extended its purpose into mainstream society. It is no longer just a remedial drug, something used to help people recover, but it is now a part of everyday life. With this progression, society has also developed a fear of medicine such as date rape drugs and workout pills.  This transformation from a drug used strictly to help people to something that assists and enhances many facets of someone’s life shows how society has become just as concerned if not more concerned with profit and material wealth as the well being of humans.

The other speaker was Richard Keller, a professor of medical history and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.  He suggested that medicine was essential in building strong empires which is a concept taken directly from Dr. Paul Chatinieres.  Throughout history, powerful nations such as the United States and France have offered medicine to people in underdeveloped countries.  Keller questions why these institutions would provide such help. To most it may seem as if these powerful nations are providing help to be moral and helpful but in reality, some countries are simply trying to gain more resources and expand their nation. There seems to be a linked distrust in two areas you might not necessarily expect- warfare and medicine. In both cases, less fortunate countries are concerned about the help that “wealthier” or more advanced countries are providing. For example, in Morocco, a French based country, Hubert Lyautey stresses the necessity and power of physicians due to their ability to assist and save the lives of those who are suffering. In addition, in recent time, Colin Powell talks about the importance of NGOs  and how they are an important part of our combat team. Obviously the military is the most significant facet, but Powell considers the NGOs almost as important due to their daily interaction with the people in these struggling nations. Due to the language barrier and the dissimilarities of their culture, citizens of impoverished countries do not believe the intentions of countries such as America to be honorable. For instance, David Brooks talks about how many countries such as Haiti resist assistance of different cultures which is often the cause of their problems. There is an existence of a voodoo religion which some believe causes Haitian people to reject and resist outside help. As a result, they are are unable to deal with problems such as the earthquake.

-AJ and Joey

2 thoughts on “Panel: Finding Meaning

  1. Cooper Kersey

    I was at the discussion last night and I found both speaker’s talks to be pretty engaging, but what really interested me was the question and answer section. For almost every question asked of the two speakers, they never seemed to give a straight answer (especially Mr. Keller). The majority of the questions seemed to be practical questions about either the management of global health organization’s funds or the ethics of a doctor in a war zone. It seemed to me that the two speaker’s backgrounds didn’t adequately prepare them to answer these questions. Mr. Keller in particular always seemed to talk about something related to the question. but he always touched on the historical background of the topic instead of the practical aspect which I think the students were looking for. I feel like it would have been helpful to have someone with a more hands on relationship to global health like a doctor who spent time in the field instead of the curator of a museum and a historian. I’m sure there are other talks going on this weekend given by people with these types of backgrounds and I guess in that case the questions weren’t really suited for this discussion, but either way it was interesting to me. The other thing I found interesting was when Mr. Keller mentioned that the live polio virus is used as a vaccine in countries like India, but the dead virus is used in the US. It seems to me like in order to reach so many people, world health organizations are compromising the care they give to foreign people because the dead vaccine is favored over the live one. I wonder how this fits into medical ethics. If it’s better to offer lower quality care to more people than higher quality to less. Lastly, on the same note i was shocked by the story Mr. Keller told about the random test done of a new vaccine somewhere in India (sorry I forget the specifics) that ended up killing about 20 percent of the kids that were tested. I think it’s extremely morally incorrect to test medicine on random children knowing full well that there could be undiscovered side effects. For anyone else who was there I’d like to know how you feel about the ethical issues raised at the talk.

Leave a Reply