Artists Make Art Because They Must

by Nancy Van Ness
USA

Forty Years Ago – I was flying. The other dancers and I, in lines, executed jumps across the studio, immediately turning and coming back – jumping over and over again – propelled by music from a pianist skilled at marking the rhythm for dancers. Though one of my feet touched the floor briefly at regular intervals, my consciousness was only of my soaring body. The physical work was very vigorous, but in that moment, it seemed effortless.

Out of the corner of my eye, I glimpsed my beloved teacher, the aged but distinguished former Denis-Shawn dancer whose approval usually mattered to me. In that moment, however, the joy of dancing held me so enthralled that I did not care what anyone thought. To my surprise, I saw her approving scrutiny. I had never before realized how much she wanted me to succeed, how invested she was in my dancing. Later, when I set off to begin my own career, she gave me the ultimate gift – the notes and scores for her class.

That was exactly four decades ago, but that exhilarating experience and moment of encouragement from my teacher have sustained me many times in my life as an artist. When the money runs out, when I don’t know where the next opportunity or the next gig is coming from, when I am looking for support for the company I founded and don’t know what will happen, when life seems tenuous and precarious, I will suddenly find myself back in that light filled studio with the piano pounding – defying gravity – easily, joyously flying. Remembering that time, I know that no matter what, I must keep going. I also know that the art I make is good and that it is the most important thing in my life.

Van Gogh said that artists make art. However, the prevailing belief in this society is that artists today make money, or the “real” artists do anyway. Anyone who doesn’t is a “wannabe”. While now prints of Van Gogh’s Sunflowers hang on walls all over the world and his Starry Night is reproduced even on neckties and china, he might not be recognized as an artist today – just as he went unrecognized in his own time. He, however, knew the truth. Artists make art. They make art because they have to, not because of money they may or may not get. Van Gogh made art in spite of huge obstacles throughout his life.

My journey as an artist has been more driven by the joy of creating and less by expressions of anyone’s approval or other outward marks of success. Looking at footage of my work recently, I was struck by how, though never perfect, it does conform to the artistic aims I hold. It felt rather like being God on the seventh day: surveying what I have created and knowing that it is good.

Though my dance work has been gratifying and is an achievement in the history of Western dance, I am not famous. No dance critic sings my praises. The audience for my very avant garde modern dance is small, but I still know that my work is important and good. Of course I would like for others to recognize that. Whether they do or not, however, will not determine my future. I cannot live without doing my art.

My dance work is so innovative that I have yet to find a use for it that makes money. I relate to Virginia Woolf who wrote in her diary that the world didn’t seem to need the book she was laboring to create, that most people would never be interested in it or even understand it. While she is today a very well known author of considerable influence, I doubt that many people have read The Waves or To The Lighthouse. Movies about her establish her fame, but most people who know about her haven’t read her oeuvre. It is challenging; it requires effort to understand.

Audiences are challenged by watching my dance in much the same way. It does not use the conventions that people in the West expect to see in dance. It does not have steps. It is not done to music, but rather is the impetus for its musical accompaniment. The music itself is also challenging. Not unlike Woolf’s readers, however, those who experience American Creative Dance performances are often transformed by them.

It doesn’t sell. Or, at least, I have not yet learned how to sell it.

What I have learned how to do is to make that particular kind of art and attract a few stalwart colleagues who like making it with me. We have brought joy, pleasure and insight to audiences in this country and in Europe.

In spite of the prevailing view, we are real artists. And in spite of all appearances, I expect that we will be recognized sooner or later.

My colleagues and I all have to scramble to keep alive. One key is versatility. We have learned to use our talents and skills in a variety of ways that sometimes both pay the rent and lead to other interesting things.

In a darkened movie theater on May 2, 1998, I had an epiphany that profoundly affected my thinking about what art is and what it should do. That evening, I was humoring my young friend Thea on her birthday by taking her to see a film she was interested in called Déjà Vu. At the time, after several decades of “high art”, I had seen very few films and felt I was slumming a little.

The musical score featured American standards, including one of Frank Sinatra’s versions of These Foolish Things. I whispered to Thea, “That is really good!” She looked at me with a slightly ironic lift of an eyebrow but refrained from asking me which rock I had crawled out from. Obviously, she agreed.

I saw that film at the cinema eight times – I, who could count on one hand the films I had seen in the last twenty-five years! It opened many new doors for me. I began a serious study of the life and oeuvre of Frank Sinatra, which led me to appreciate not only his talent and skills, but also his generosity as a performer.

Although I was preparing a performance of my high art modern dance at the time, nonetheless I was transformed. For the first time in my life, I consciously set as a goal to be a generous performer. Not just excellent, but generous as well.

Opening up to this new way of thinking led me to explore how to use my own talents and the potential of the company to create more accessible art.

I began a journey through different dance forms that took me to corners of the world I had never thought I would see. Though it took me over a year to get there, I decided to take up partner dancing. That path led me to the competitive ballroom dancers of the former Soviet Union, the best in the world. I trained with them for seven months, hating every minute of it, but growing to love them in the process.

In turn, ballroom dance directed me to Argentine tango, which I loved immediately and which opened up yet another new world. I spent time in Buenos Aires, a place that had never interested me but one that I came to love. My leading role in a very funny romantic film called Tango Passion was another by-product of taking up tango. My friend and visual artist Jaime Davidovich says it may lead to a new career in film for me!

For years people said to me, not always kindly, that my life should be on television. So American Creative Dance hired writer Ronnie Koenig to create a pilot for a sitcom based on us and our lives as working artists in New York. We have yet to get that produced, but someday we may.

All of these crazy activities and experiences are ways to keep going. Artists must make art. They cannot live without it.

As a five year old making my performing debut dancing on the stage of the Mosque Theater in Richmond with a pit full of musicians and theater technology that was excellent for the time, the thing that struck me most was the light. Like others I know who have performed since early childhood, I had no stage fright. That comes later for many of us.

The light, however, was new and unexpected. Decades later, in the company of a visual artist and her husband, I saw the movie starring Neve Campbell as a professional dancer, The Company. There were shots that let the audience see stage light from the performers’ perspective. My friends were transfixed, as I had been at age five. We look out into the dark. That dark is alive and expectant, holding its breath, waiting to know what we are going to do.

I love intimate chamber performances where the audience is close to me. I like that people can hear us breathe and see us sweat. One of those intimate performances took place on a bitter cold night, in a tiny theater in which the back stage areas were not heated adequately. Lena, our principle vocalist, and I were to perform a piece of our repertory called the Rondo. We were wrapped up and had to move continually just to keep warm as we waited to go on.

Lena loves metaphors to describe the creative problems we perform and she likes to fix the sequence of them in her mind right before we go on stage. Still in our warm wraps, we joined hands in the freezing wings and whispered, “up north, lead, up north, milonga, up north, lamentations…” Then, when the stage manager told us to do so, we pulled off our wraps and walked out onto the warm, lighted stage.

It is magic. We are suspended in time. We take our places without hurry. We are relaxed; this is our natural home. We sense the waiting audience behind the dark. We take our first breath together and begin.

This is one of the best performances of our lives, effortless, the work taking over and pouring through us, one of those peak performances that come to us if we just keep working. They cannot be forced, they come unexpectedly. They are so powerful that I will do anything just for the chance to have another.

One of these peak experiences every decade or so is enough to keep me dancing. Artists make art.

About the Author

Nancy Van Ness, founder and Director of the American Creative Dance group in New York City, is a 61 year old modern dancer who has taken up tango in recent years. Always serious about dance, she went to Buenos Aires to study with one of the greatest maestros of that form. Having spent decades in a unitard in small black box theaters making “high art,” she is now sometimes seen in slinky dresses dancing tango con alma y pasión in tango salons and at international dance concerts.

As an unexpected result of her tango dancing, she was cast as the female lead in Tango Passion, a romantic comedy set in a tango salon. Tango Passion is now being featured at film festivals, most recently at the 2007 Boston International Film Festival. Van Ness says, “It is a romantic comedy about people my age instead of young lovers. I took on the role partly to confront stereotypes about who is lovable, who is attractive, who is even visible in our culture.” Filled with many surprises, it is about a couple whose relationship has definitely not lost the spice of life.

Van Ness was, however, shocked to find that the medium works in ways she hadn’t understood before. The exhibit “Dangerous Beauty” at the Chelsea Art Museum elucidated what was troubling her about having played the role of the luscious Claudia in the film.

Van Ness created an innovative, avant garde system of dance and musical accompaniment for her company, American Creative Dance. The troupe’s dance work requires performers to be creators; they do not perform dance classics. All dancers use their own bodies to make art, they do not have an impersonal instrument such as the musician, the painter, or the writer does. But using one’s body as a tool involves risk. Dancers in this troupe create their work in plain view under the audience’s eyes. For further information please visit American Creative Dance.

Nancy Van Ness lives in New York City.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in FEATURE ARTICLES
8 comments on “Artists Make Art Because They Must
  1. Gwen Goldsmith says:

    Van Ness has perfectly captured the heart of the matter… that artists make art because they will die if they don’t. And there are many ways to die beyond the obvious lack of brain activity and heart muscle pumping. It can be death to be trapped in a relationship that saps your creativity. It can be death to hate your day-job, that saps your life force and leaves you too drained to play after hours. Our world is competitive, striving, challenging, and yet we must make time to do what our Creator made us for – or we die a little bit more each day. When parents ask me to speak with their college-bound teenagers about studying to be an actor, I always tell them the same thing: If there is anything else that can make you happy, go do that other thing – you can have a happy life. But if your art is everything to you, if you dream it, see it, fantasize about it all the time – then go live your dream, go make your art, because if you pretend it doesn’t matter to you, you will be empty and your life will be unreal. We must find ways to express our art no matter what – and Van Ness has taught me that in many ways over the years. She is a great teacher, dancer and actor. I thank her for her example.

  2. Alexandra says:

    Thank you Nancy for being such a dedicated contributor to the WIP, I always enjoy reading your thoughtful commentary. This article make me think of the a letter that I keep on my wall from Martha Graham to Agnes De Mille. In it Martha writes to Agnes:
    “There is a vitality, a life force, a quickening that is translated through you into action, and because there is only one of you in all time, this expression is unique. And if you block it, it will never exist through any other medium and be lost, the world will not have it.”
    As an artist myself, I have a very different attitude in my 30’s then I did in my 20’s. I am realizing that it is not my job to judge my work but my responsibility to show up for it. I am learning to make it a ritual to follow through from beginning, middle, to end despite how “valuable” I think it may be perceived in the end. There have been times in the studio and more recently at the computer, when in order to get moving I have had to say to myself, “you know what Ali, dare to be mediocre… just get moving!”
    Personally, my path has been challenging but my own liberation as an artist started when I stopped thinking that I had “create” something from nothing and decided perhaps I needed “execute,” something that already exists inside of me.

  3. Mary D Felix says:

    Nance –
    I just read this today. Here’s my reaction.
    It flies – It recreates in its words and sentences, its examples and descriptions what you said you experienced so long ago – flying – and occasionally dipping down to touch the earth.
    How the world – and especially our poor US needs to see the freshness of artists (in italics) creating as they go!!
    You did it!! Love, Mary

  4. Fan says:

    It is SO inspiring to read you Nancy! Thank you, it feels easier to be a struggling artist after this article.

  5. Theresa Kingston says:

    Nancy, it is amazing that you have time to blend all your artistic skills – dancing and writing, both of them need much concentration. Indeed you are amazing!

  6. Catherine Van Aken says:

    Nancy Van Ness’ article really spoke to me. I know exactly what she means when she says “artists make art because they must” and I greatly admire those who, like Nancy, recognize and embrace their calling early in life . . . and weather the consequences (lean years, etc). I was less clear and more cowardly, and as a result, spent decades in exile before finally pursuing my passion in my mid-50’s. There are doubtless many artists who, like me, could be characterized as late bloomers.
    As a child, I spent endless hours crouched over the coffee table, drawing. But, I attended a grammar school and junior high school that offered no art classes and did not value artistic endeavors. By the time I reached high school, a self-conscious, unsure teenager, I was convinced that everyone was so far advanced in drawing and painting that I could never catch up, so out of fear of failure, I did not take any art classes. Under the influence of my family and based on my academic achievement in high school, it was understood that I would become a professional of some sort. I needed to be practical. The only avenues I ever really considered were physician, engineer, college professor or lawyer. It never occured to me that I would be anything else. As it turned out I became a lawyer and practiced for 31 years, finally retiring this year.
    BUT, during all of those years, from earliest childhood until today, I have been happiest when I was “creating” something, anything, and miserable when I had no time or energy for artistic pursuits. Of course, working 50-60 hours per week routinely and raising a son, I had to be alert to opportunities (and excuses) for artistic release. My son had a mom-made pinata at every birthday party, elaborately decorated cupcakes and cakes whenever the opportunity presented itself, fantastic (if uncomfortable) Halloween costumes, haunted houses, Halloween mugs. I worked on the costuming and set design for every school play and engaged in overbearing “participation” in all of my son’s art projects, posters, models, dioramas, etc. until, at age 11, he told me to “back off”.
    While the practice of law was intellectually stimulating and in many ways rewarding, it was not enough. And I came to feel (particularly as I grew older and had less and less time to waste) that it was an obstacle to my happiness, preventing me from doing what I really NEEDED to do.
    Two years ago, with my son grown and gone, I discovered glass and was instantly taken by the infinite possibilities, as well as the challenging limitations, presented by this unique, magical medium. While I was forced to start slowly because of work and other commitments, now that I am retired, I spend the vast majority of my time creating kiln-formed glass pieces. I find that the process is everything. And while it is invigorating and thrilling when someone purchases a piece and reports how much they enjoy it, most of the satisfaction comes from the making and the discovery and progress that comes with each new piece. My ultimate goal is to create public art and I am confident that I will do that.
    There is a quote in the book ART & FEAR by David Bayles and Ted Oraland, that I just love:
    “When my daughter was about seven years old, she asked me what I did at work. I told her that I worked at the college — that my job was to teach people to draw. She stared back at me incredulous and said, ‘You mean they forget?'” Howard Ikemoto
    It’s all coming back to me, now. And what’s more, given the life experiences that I have enjoyed and endured and the fact that I have outgrown the paralyzing self-consiousness of youth, I have more ideas than ever and greater freedom to express them.
    Catherine Van Aken

  7. Karin Schmidt says:

    Reading thoughts about being or becoming artist mirrors the pain of human conditions. Each one of us in some way, sons and daughters of artists like Da Vinci, Van Gogh, Matisse, Callas or Woolf. Pain of giving birth is like stars in the dark of the night. Witness of personal struggle for being who we are, a lifeboat. One to each one. Thank you, also for presenting the forum!
    Karin Schmidt
    dancer and artist, tying continents together

  8. LPR says:

    Dear Nancy,
    What an inspiring article. I live in Buenos Aires and it is nice to hear about your travels and studies here. It is great to hear that you enjoy your tango with “alma y pasion”. Passion is the key to enjoying any form of art. Congratulations……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*