East of Eden and Suffering: Will Clinton’s Economic Policy Proposals Improve Our Lot?

by Katharine Daniels
Founder & Executive Editor, The WIP
USA

On Tuesday Hillary Clinton made a campaign stop in Salinas, California. Otherwise known as ‘the lettuce capital of the world’ or John Steinbeck’s East of Eden, Salinas just happens to be the farm town I call home.

Nearly 3,000 of Senator Clinton’s supporters showed up at the Hartnell College gymnasium to hear her speak. She was greeted in true Salinas Valley fashion, with mariachis and shouts for Viva la Causa (“Long Live Our Cause”). Clinton’s campaign stop was pulled together in just twenty-four hours following an official endorsement by the United Farm Workers of America, the union co-founded by Dolores Huerta and César Chávez that today represents more than 27,000 farm workers.

From a chair on reporter row, I watched the community file in and seat themselves beside the farm workers. I recognized the mayor and our local state representatives, teachers, healthcare workers, and other true middle class Americans. It is these Americans who rely on community colleges such as Hartnell for accessible education, a college currently facing a $1.3 million dollar deficit. It is these Americans, without adequate healthcare coverage, who rely on the county medical facilities that are also in financial crisis. It is these Americans who have been most affected by the subprime mortgage crisis that has hit California worse than any other state in the nation.

Clinton began her speech quoting César Chávez: “The fight is never about grapes or about lettuce. It is always about people.” I wondered if the folks in this gym shared any of my doubt or pessimism as to whether Clinton really means what she says.

As the economy slides toward recession and the candidates respond in tit-for-tat squabbles over televised question-and-answer sessions we erroneously call debates, I have become more and more disillusioned with all politicians and their regard for everyday Americans feeling the crunch. Clinton told her audience that “people” is what her campaign is about. She said, “I don’t believe this campaign is about me, or any of the candidates. I believe it is about what goals we are going to set for America and then how we will achieve them.” The people are here and the crisis is real. I eagerly awaited Clinton’s proposals.

From the applause and energy in the room it was clear that the economic plan Clinton laid out on Tuesday spoke to many broken hearts. Her plan centers on rebuilding the middle class and drawing on our collective memory of what worked for America in the past. With new leadership in the White House and a new sense of “commitment, creativity, and innovation” by all Americans, Clinton believes we can come together and “maximize” what we can do. “In America we are supposed to look at the hard realities, roll up our sleeves and do something about it.” As she reported to the New York Times on Monday, “If you go back and look at our history, we were most successful when we had that balance between an effective, vigorous government and a dynamic, appropriately regulated market…[W]e have systematically diminished the role and responsibility of the government, and we have watched our market become imbalanced.”

Clinton’s approach to the economy begins with regaining fiscal sovereignty. The country must stop spending money it does not have and end our dependence on foreign money to satiate consumer demands, she warned. “We borrow money from the Chinese to buy oil from the Saudis,” she said with sarcasm. One way to create more jobs right here in the United States is by investing in clean energy. She proposes a new workforce made up of “green collar” workers and the creation of five million jobs installing solar panels, wind turbines, and other clean energy devices. To pay for this she would eliminate the tax subsidies for big oil companies.

To address the mortgage crisis, Hillary Clinton proposes a 90-day moratorium that would freeze foreclosures and give homeowners and lenders the necessary time to renegotiate endangered loans. The screams around the room were indication enough that the mortgage crisis wasn’t just a story on CNN for folks in Salinas. Clinton’s moratorium proposal is for homeowners who can remain in their homes at the current rate but who would fall into foreclosure if it rises. Clinton would rather have homeowners in their homes paying something than out of their homes paying nothing. As Americans lose their homes “you see a deteriorating neighborhood, you see a deteriorating tax base, you begin to see a cut back in services, and then the next thing you know we are in a much deeper hole than we are in today,” she forewarned. Clinton also proposes a five year freeze on mortgage interest rates and putting $650 dollars immediately in the hands of people to deal with rising energy costs.

The men and women I spoke with before Senator Clinton arrived were unanimously excited about her proposal for Universal Health Care. Her American Health Choices Plan would offer the Congressional Health Plan to all currently uninsured or underinsured Americans, giving them the ability to choose from the same plans available to members of Congress, including dental and mental health. Working families and small businesses would get tax credits to help pay the premiums. Clinton envisions a coalition of business, labor and medical professionals to take on the insurance industry. We must quit paying HMOs more than doctors and make electronic medical records mandatory, she declared. According to Clinton, the think tank Rand found that if electronic medical records were mandatory, the United States would save $77 billion a year.

Education, what Clinton referred to as “the passport for opportunity for the middle class” must be available to every child. She advocates for universal pre-kindergarten to prepare students for school and for creating partnerships with schools to implement what teachers know works, including smaller class sizes and ending Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act. To make college affordable, Clinton proposes increasing Pell Grants and a $3500 tax credit for families for every child for each year they are in college. Clinton would create a National Service program that would allow students to earn up to $20,000 toward a college education. She also proposes a program where students could eliminate their education debt over time by taking a public service job after graduation. At that proposal, a twenty-something male sitting in front of me turned to his friend and said, “That’s what I’m talking about baby.” And for the 60% of our young people who do not go to college, Clinton discussed better on the job training and apprenticeship programs.

In spite of the vigorous applause Clinton received when she expressed her commitment to AgJobs, a bill that would give undocumented workers a path to citizenship, the room fell silent when Clinton’s speech turned to the 12 to 14 million people who are living here illegally. She spoke candidly about the unrealistic notion of actually rounding up all the undocumented workers who are in this country now and deporting them. Instead she suggests bringing people out of the shadows and registering everyone. The crowd appreciated her recognition that the vast majority of undocumented workers in America are hardworking people and not criminals. She spoke sternly, however, about the need to deport criminals and would require that all undocumented immigrants pay both a fine and back taxes. Her plan also includes toughening border security and holding employers accountable to the law. Communities like Salinas, whose public services are burdened by immigration, should receive proper aid from the federal government. Further, she would work with our neighbors to the south to create more jobs in their own countries to relieve northward migration.

An issue our writers and editors often discuss at The WIP is the rising anti-Americanism around the world. Restoring America’s leadership and moral authority, according to Clinton, begins with ending the war in Iraq and bringing the troops home. She pledged to start this process on day one in office. Concerned about both Americans’ and Iraqis’ safety, she would call on her Secretary of Defense, her Joint Chiefs of Staff and her Security Advisors to begin drawing up an appropriate plan. She pledged to take care of the young soldiers coming home from this war and the veterans from her generation who are also not getting the help they need. She proposes a 21st century G.I. Bill of Rights to take care of all American veterans.

By the time Senator Clinton concluded her speech she had spoken to our community for nearly an hour. The crowd cheered her on like a rock star and I couldn’t help but feel sadness. I worried, with all the hope in the room, coupled with a desperation that was palpable, ‘can Hillary or any of the candidates really turn this country around?’ Fiscal irresponsibility, war profiteering, the outsourcing of American jobs, and the decline of our educational system are all extremely huge challenges for the next president. Hillary appeared to have the power to deliver results. Let’s hope this isn’t just the accomplished performance of a good politician.

Is a presidential candidate coming to your town?
The WIP invites women across the country to submit their own coverage of the candidates.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Economy, FEATURE ARTICLES, Special Election Coverage, The WIP Editorial
7 comments on “East of Eden and Suffering: Will Clinton’s Economic Policy Proposals Improve Our Lot?
  1. Nancy Van Ness says:

    Kate:
    Thank you for this account of the event in Salinas. I am glad to have your view of what went on.
    I, too, worry about what Clinton or any of the “major” candidates will do. She has been in office for one full six year term and part of a second. I look at what people do, not what they say. I am concerned about her voting record and her failure to be proactive in resisting the Bush regime’s agenda of aggression, abrogation of rights under the Constitution, and corporatocracy.
    If she and other Democrats (or Republicans for that matter) in the Congress had voted against the Bush regime’s agenda, if they had refused to sign on to it in any way, they would certainly have lost many votes; but this country would look very different. It would be obvious here and abroad that there is an opposition to the Bush regime.
    I worry that she nowhere mentioned the USA Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act. If this country does not repeal them, we are left with “laws” that deny us the freedoms our Constitution put in place. When anyone can be declared an enemy and shipped off to black sites without recourse, not only immigrants are at risk, but US citizens who dissent or hold unpopular opinions could be. US citizens who aid “undesirable” immigrants could be.
    In other venues I have seen that Clinton’s idea of dealing with Iraq calls for maintaining forces in the area. My idea is to withdraw all US personnel and to get the mercenaries off the payroll immediately.
    I, too, want to see things change for the better. As you do, I have misgivings about Clinton and the others currently featured by the corporate media.

  2. LPR says:

    Wow Kate, Great article. I appreciate the fact that I can read an unbiased review of what went on at Hillary Clinton’s campaign stop in Salinas. It is nice to be able to get all the information without being there. I certainly do hope that someone can turn the country around but as you said it will be quite a challenge for the next president.
    Thank you again. LPR

  3. Constance Manika, Zimbabwe says:

    Yes Katherine I understand where you are coming from. Before anything else this a great article and a good account. The problem is that from experience, when seemingly good leaders with bright ideas come into power they fail to deliver. The other problem is that politics is so dirty that even when the electorate is presented with a promising and a perfect leader they are skeptical. In way I think we are used to having bad leaders in the world. But I think the Americans should give Hillary a chance, women are by nature not war mongers, peace loving and always have the interests of people at heart given a chance. I am for Hillary Clinton, a woman for a change!
    As one great mind said: “The hand that rocks the cradle rules the World.” ( I hope I got that right).

  4. nancy stephens says:

    Kate,
    Thank you for your unbiased account of Hilary’s speech.
    I too am skeptical when it comes to the leading candidates promises or proposed policies if they do become President.
    However a book does not get written a word at a time but one letter at a time so with that in mind we need to have faith in the candidate we choose and praise the changes as they come.

  5. serena1313 says:

    Thank You Kate for laying that out, however, a couple of things missing that people ought to know before they vote wrt Hillary’s plans for Iraq and the moratorium on foreclosures:
    1) she will not say whether the US will maintain permanent bases in Iraq.
    2) the cap on foreclosures is “voluntary.”
    Hillary has a lot going for her and no doubt she is intelligent. However there are a few other things to take into consideration:
    Something many have overlooked is the weapons-industrial-complex are some of Hillary’s largest donors as well as corporate lobbyists.
    It seems that most of Hillary’s decisions are more political than anything. Take for instance her vote for attacking Iraq. More importantly she voted against 3 amendments that would have curbed Bush’s rush to war. One of which was submitted by Dick Durbin (D-Il) that would have compelled Bush to demonstrate “imminent threat” prior to invading Iraq.
    The second was Levin’s amendment. Granted Levin’s bill called for the UN’s approval before force could be used, but it also reinforced America’s right to defend itself even if the UN voted against it. Therein nothing in that bill was an impediment to the US in any way. Yet Hillary claimed it would have made the president “subordinate” to the UN.
    So basically her vote against Levin’s bill meant she was against international support and the UN’s consensus. Moreover her votes would be relevant only if she believed that Bush 41 had been wrong to go to the UN for international support and approval.
    Although the amendments were defeated Hillary had 3 chances to slow down Bush’s rush to war, but chose not to! Publicly she was fully supportive of Bush’s war.
    Hillary also shifted her policy on torture. At first she said she would seek “legal” exemption to saying her current position, “torture cannot be American policy.”
    All of which leads me to believe Hillary will be more of the same, but as a “Bush-lite.” And the republican contenders will be like Bush, only on steroids!
    Furthermore Clinton never talks about her tenure as a corporate lawyer at the Rose Law Firm, the Arkansan corporate powerhouse.
    In the mid-1980s she served as a board member for Wal-Mart. While the company started to campaign against unions Hillary stayed silent. She claims she fought for women’s rights, but nothing was ever achieved.
    I suggest taking a closer look at her actions rather than believe everything she tells us; it is what she doesn’t say that worries me.
    Actions speak louder than words.

  6. clarence swinney says:

    Hillry said you get Two For One. Can they repeat this awesome record
    PRAISE CLINTON AND GORE WITH PLEASURE
    GDP–rose from 6,300 to 11,600
    NATIONAL INCOME-5,000 to 8,000 Billion–
    JOBS CREATED—237,000 per month to replace Jimmy Carter record of 218,000.
    AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNINGS–$360 to $478
    AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS WORKED–never hit 35.0–hit that mark 4 times in 80’s
    UNEMPLOYMENT–from 7.2% down down down to as low as 3.9%
    MINIMUM WAGE–$4.25 to $5.15
    MINORITIES–did exceedingly well
    HOME OWNERSHIP–hit all time high (no big deal most can say this-except Reagan)
    DEFICIT–290 Billion to whoopee a SURPLUS
    DEBT—-+28%—300% increase over prior 12 years by Conservatives.
    FEDERAL SPENDING–+28%—+80% under Reagan- who is da true conservative?
    DOW JONES AVERAGE—3,500 to 11,720 top in 2000. All it’s history to get to 3500 and Clinton zooms it
    NASDAQ–700 to 5,000 top in 2000.—All of it’s history to get to 700 and Clinton zooms it
    VALUES INDEXES– almost all bad went down–good went up in zoom zoom zoom
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS–Peace on Earth good will toward each other—Mark of a true Christian–what has Bush done to Peace on Earth?
    POPULARITY—highest poll ratings in history during peacetime in AFRICA, ASIA AND EUROPE . Even 98.5% in Moscow–left office with Highest Gallup rating since it was started in 1920’s.
    STAND UP FOR JUSTICE–evil conservatives spent $110,000,000 on hearings and investigations and caught one very evil man who took a few plane rides to events.
    BOW YOUR HEADS—“Thank you God for sending us a man of Bill Clinton’s character, intelligence, knowledge of governance, ability to face up to crises without whimpering and a great leader of the world. Amen”.
    THANK YOU GOD FOR THE GOOD TIMES THE CLINTON YEARS.
    clarence swinney-political historian-Lifeaholics of America- burlington nc
    clarenceswinney@bellsouth.net
    6-28-03

  7. Matthew says:

    I don’t suppose anyone here remembers how well the government handled the medical treatment of our own veterans, do they?
    That’s right. It was a recent, and very hard to miss, news story. The headline might as well have been “Fiasco”.
    And yet a substantial portion of our population wants us to put more power over our healthcare issues in the hands of the government. The same people act as if it will be free, or of minimal expense. When was the last time our government undertook anything at a cost lower than what was available from the private sector?
    This, in combination with the idea that our citizen taxpayers will also be absorbing the healthcare costs of the 12 to 14 million illegal immigrants mentioned in the article above. . . is this starting to sound just a bit crazy to anyone else?
    None of these programs are free. Our government has no money that it does not first take from us. Ask yourselves where, if not in your pocket and mine, they will find it. Think about how much more of your income you’d like deducted from your paycheck. Ask how a vastly inflated healthcare beauracracy will benefit any of us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*