While the no mow program is being touted as saving money, our department actually started it last year. Two test locations were chosen: one along Porter Field Road, and another where the old A-Frame dorms were by FIC. Both of these were large expanses of mown grass (weekly mowing), that were not in use by students. Allowed to do their own thing, they naturally came up in what appeared to be wildflowers, although are actually attractive lawn weeds (it’s all in your viewpoint I guess). The feedback on these areas was great, with next to no complaints.
With the budget shortfall, Middlebury College was looking for reductions in expenditures. Many different people suggested mowing less, which was ironic, because based on the success of the previous year we were looking to do it anyway. (Really, how often in life does one get to do the right thing by not doing something? It’s almost too good to be true) Naturally, by mowing less, we are saving money, fuel, and time, and with this, of course, comes the reduction of emissions, carbon, noise, and all the other fossil fuel evils.
I would, however, beg not to lose sight of one the actual reasons why the program got started in the first place, which was for its ecological soundness. While at Middlebury we pride ourselves in having beautiful grounds, ecologically it’s a desert. Large shade trees and lawn give next to no habitat for pollinators, migrating songbirds, insects, amphibians, even what I call the “rotters”, the worms, fungi, and other organisms responsible for breaking down dead plant matter. Having areas of campus grow up in meadow, albeit non-native plants, increases diversity, and provides refuge and habitat above and beyond a green expanse of lawn.
There is another benefit, a bit more esoteric than the others. One of my roles at the college is an in-house landscape designer, and even in that role I am enjoying the no-mow program. I’d always found what we in the department call North campus (north of route 125) to be somewhat, well, not unattractive, but something was definitely not quite right, and I could never quite figure it out. After all, we have great views, nice buildings, good trees, but north seemed to lack the ‘wow’ factor of the other half of campus.
And what it was missing was the diversity. Only large trees and lawn was giving the north side a boring, repetitive sameness, a prairie of grass punctuated by trees, but not visually arresting enough to be stimulating. Now, the large areas of tall grass and wildflowers break up swaths of lawn, and take away from the conformity of campus. Picture stepping out of Bicentennial Hall, turning south and heading towards Pearsons Hall. Immediately in front of Bi-Hall is lawn, with some Adirondack Chairs, Emily May’s Pollinator Garden around a large Pear tree, and Smog. As you walk south, though, the lawn stops, and on either side of the sidewalk is large grass and wildflowers, with a break on your right, a mown area around a pair of Yellowwood trees, creating a little park, and another break at the top of the ridge, creating an overlook park with a magnificent view over Battell Beach looking east towards the Green Mountains. So now, we are highlighting one of the most spectacular trees on campus, and emphasizing a view that may have been so ubiquitous in the past that it was ignored. (Side thought here- I can remember a discussion in one of my landscape design classes at UVM talking about views. The talk was of placing a house on a property with a good view from a certain location. We came to the conclusion that the best place to site the house was a little ways away from the view, so that it was a short walk. It makes the view more special, and not taken for granted.)
I had a great chat with my friend Scott Barnicle, the Dean of Atwater, about the landscape giving a feeling of conformity to the students, and that effect on student psyche. We do pick up clues about ourselves from our surroundings, and also like to surround ourselves with reflections of how we fell, or what we would like to be. Middlebury is a great, diverse college, and we should strive to have our landscape reflect this as well.
By breaking up North campus into more distinct areas, and shrinking the amount of what seems like usable area, we are increasing the value of what is left. Ironically, there is only a perceived loss of space-none of the areas now in no-mow were really used anyway, except by some intrepid Frisbee golf players. What’s left just feels more precious, more distinct, more useful.
So how are we maintaining the no-mow areas? Let’s not say no-mow, but very, very little mow. One of our concerns was Lyme disease, spread by deer ticks. We are mowing a 5 foot swath next to any sidewalk, creating a ‘breakdown lane’, so stepping off the path to get out of the way of a vehicle, bicycle, or student with their nose in a book means you don’t have to walk in the tall grass. In a couple of locations we have mown a path right through the center of an area, because some areas need a sidewalk and don’t have one. Also, in order to break the lifecycle of deer ticks, we will be mowing twice. Once will be right around commencement time, and again last thing in the fall. The late spring mowing coincides with a key breeding time for the deer tick, giving it no long grass for egg laying. It also cuts the fast growing grass down, to give the wildflowers a chance to grow and thrive. Look for this effect in hay fields in the summer. First cut is always real grassy, and the second cut all the clover and alfalfa seem to be the primary plants. The legumes were always there-it was just the grass growing faster in the spring choking out the others. The late fall mowing tidies up the grounds, exposing any late ticks, and spreads any wildflower seeds that may have formed.
Emily May has been spending her summer compiling a plant census of what is coming up, and I’ll be working with Professor Helen Young’s Plant Biology class in the fall to continue. So far, like I mentioned before, it’s primarily lawn weeds, non-native species that were existing in the lawn. The master plan of Middlebury College calls for many of these no-mow areas to be planted in native meadow species, by removing what is there, and planting plugs of native meadow plants. While this would be wonderful, it would also be expensive and laborious. I am hoping that the research shows that with the maintenance plan we are emphasizing native plants, and can convert these areas to somewhat native meadows naturally.
13 thoughts on “No Mow”
I am disappointed by the selection of the hill between the Ross complex and Coffrin as a “No Mow” zone. This was formerly a pristene lawn for off-court bocce and thus a gathering place for students to have impromptu conversations that added to their liberal arts education. Unfortunately, this hill is now clearly unusable for such sporting activities and in turn such profound and valuable intellectual discussions. I remain saddened that future generations of Middlebury students will not have the opportunity to roll a bocce ball and relax with their friends on the finely mowed grass and subtle natural contours of this precious land.
Here in Minnesota there are park programs where volunteers collect seeds in the fall from native plants in re-established prairies in order to expand the natural wildlife or create new prairies. In fact, the whole process becomes one of volunteering and learning by all ages of students. Now sure how a prairie restoration project would fit in with letting previously mown grass grow wild, but I am just suggesting that there are probably options that when explored in combination with Vermont’s park system might not be as wildly expensive as one might think. And actually, a slight investment early on might save even more money and be more environmentally friendly than just letting the lawn grow wild.
I recently brought grandma to campus to see where her grandson would be starting his college education in the fall. She had seen photographs and I was excited to show her the lovely campus. I was dismayed to see the wildflower, grass-gone-to-seed look of the campus. I found myself making excuses for the look of the campus because she (and I) were not at all happy with what we saw. I was hopeful that it would all be back to normal in the fall. This article indicates that the summer look will continue. As a new parent I’m saddened by this. I understand cost cutting and carbon footprints but think this initiative changes the look and feel and accessibiilty of several areas of the campus. I did not see lots of natural wildflowers; mostly clover and tall grass. As noted in one of the comments above, some of these areas are areas where students would just hang out, play or sit on the grass. I wonder about the reaction of returning students. If their reaction is negative, will this action be reconsidered?
I would advise to use plants that are native to the area and plants that are mature with low maintenance. First, native plants tend to last longer and they usually need little maintenance. Second, mature plants tend to also require a lot less maintenance. When figuring what to do, it is important to think how much it is going to cost AND what it the replacement cost, the maintenance cost and how often it will need to be replaced or taken care of.
As an alternative to “No Mow”, how about “Healthy Heaths” or “The Heath Project” the “Wild-Flower Project”? Cheers, DXC.
I love this idea, and it’s something I’ve been mulling for my own (much, much, much smaller!) property. I particularly appreciate the info about the timing of your twice-yearly mowing and how that affects which plants dominate.
What equipment do you use for that twice-yearly mowing of the meadow areas?
I am glad to see the college taking another concrete steps towards living up to it’s reputation as an environmental leader. I always felt that all the perfectly manicured lawns were kind-of overkill, and clearly costly for such a large campus. I don’t think there’s ever been a shortage of space for students to hang out on or play bocci so I really don’t see this as infringing on anyone. Personally, I like the idea of making the campus feel a little more natural by letting wildflowers grown back. Good decision!
I’m curious to see if your maintenance plan succeeds in weeding out non-native species but I’m doubtful. Having to exercise adaptive management in a year or two by planting native species from seed, plugs or pots should not be considered a failure but as a worthy experiment. Plant palettes should be considered with year round color to satisfy the unaccustomed eye that initially perceives clutter. Catchy signage like “Wildflowers in Progress” that identify selected species will help gain acceptance. For larger contiguous areas, rare and beautiful ground nesting birds can be accommodated with a modified mowing schedule. Good luck! – PW ’99
As an alumnus who misses Middlebury and its rural setting, I think the meadow look is a great addition to the campus. Its seems to tie the campus in with the surrounding campus while also forcing visitors to reconsider the monotonous and artificial aesthetic of a close cropped green carpet. I would support seeding the new meadow areas with natural wildflowers that can grow among the grass.
What a great idea, and the results are so pretty, too. Way to go, Middlebury! I’m very proud of you.
I think it is a wonderful idea! I have always felt there was too much mowed lawn, but what would anyone really DO about it? Kudos to you!