There are many reasons to apologize, whether on your own behalf or your nation’s. Perhaps the most important is to put the past to rest in order to move on. “History is often tragic,” Mr. Obama said in Turkey, “but unresolved, it can be a heavy weight. … And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future.” He had just finished talking about America’s legacy of slavery and discrimination, and was pivoting to Turkey’s need to come to terms with “the terrible events of 1915” — the Armenian genocide (not that Mr. Obama used that terribly freighted word). Mr. Obama suggested that Turkey needed to confront its mistreatment of minorities, as the United States has done, to achieve justice today.
This paragraph is from a blog and the reason I chose it is that because of the amount of punctuations used, this paragraph just stands out at first glance. It is also interesting to see how punctuations differ from a regular academic paper or a news piece because in a blog, it comes directly from a person’s thought stream and needs to get the author’s emotions across. Therefore, the use of quotation marks, ellipses, dashes and brackets really gets emotions and emphasis across.
Above Rome’s pale yellow and dusky orange buildings, the sky somehow looks bluer than it does almost anywhere else. Did I take proper note of that when I saw it all the time? When it was the canopy over my waking, my working and the all-consuming, all-distracting tedium of daily life?
Reading this passage just blew my mind and I just had to add it here. The writing is amazing but I feel like the punctuation marks used, specifically the question marks make this passage even more powerful
This is not simply a matter of grammatical correctness. Shortening “illegal immigrants” to “illegals” reduces human beings to a status label, and a morally loaded one at that. It reduces the essence of a person to an act of violation, an offense. When you use “illegals” as the object of a sentence it literally erases the human beings who the sentence is about and makes the grammatical object of the sentence an abstraction, a label of condemnation.
This particular paragraph is from an opinions page from The New York Times and the reason it stood out for me is because the author here uses quotation marks not quote someone but rather to convey the irony of this subject and to emphasize the name “illegal immigrants.”