Category Archives: INTERACTION

Crabbe (2003: 21) describes this category very simply as “speaking and writing with one or more interlocutors in real or simulated communicative situations.” We therefore post here ideas, tasks, tools and concepts for interactive behaviors for language learners, from pair and small group work to formal debates and academic discussions to writing and responding to blog posts and other online exchanges.

Needs Assessment

Needs assessment is a great tool for diagnostics, improvement, and research among other things. It was fascinating to hear from ESL students and the MIIS faculty and instructors what makes MIIS great and what could be improved. I’d love to just keep talking with the students, to find out what makes a good language program, language teacher, etc.

Designing the weekly schedule required the most brain power because we would look at the current schedule and wonder what was the reasoning and logic behind EVERYTHING. Why make class an hour and twenty minutes instead of an hour and a half? Or an hour and ten minutes? Or just an hour? Why is one course only three times a week when everything else is four? Is there a reason content courses are last in the afternoon rather than first thing in the morning? In the end we made some tweaks. But not too much. No point fixing what’s not broken.

Since it was the amount of classes and the amount of time per day which came up as complaints, we focused on that. If I were to attend a language program, I’d think the current set-up is too easy too. I’d go for as many electives as I can and seek out every opportunity to use the language. But we know not everyone is so ambitious, which is why options are good.

It’d be cool to go back to everyone we’ve talked with and show them what we’ve designed to find out what they think about it. See what they think is a good idea and what wouldn’t work. Actually, if we had the time, this should be the next step…looks like there’s still more work to be done!

Jerry – Reflection on Dr. Roy Lyster’s Talk

First of all, I like how Dr. Lyster begins his presentation with cognitive advantages of bilingualism and selective attention. He makes an interesting point that having to manage two languages and switch between them allows learners to hone cognitive skills, but this “two for one” ability does not come to learners for free. According to Dr. Lyster, attention of learners must be drawn to their L2 that is well manipulated and enhanced through content-based instruction. So, based on this idea of attention, I think that language teachers must consider psychological aspects of learning and then come up with effective ways for their students to fully concentrate on language learning before choosing appropriate contents.

The second interesting point Dr. Lyster makes is that L2 learners in French immersion curriculum demonstrate high communicative abilities and confidence as well as native-like comprehension skills but low production skills in grammatical accuracy, lexical variety, and sociolinguistic appropriateness. In other words, separation of language and content allow students to bypass grammar and lexicon. Just as Dr. Lyster proposes systematic integration of language and content over decontextualized language teaching, I believe it is imperative that teachers think about flaws of traditional language teaching such as subject-matter instruction and transfer-appropriate processing.

Third, Dr. Lyster introduces integration of language and content through what is called counterbalance. The crux of this concept is that there must be a proportionate influence of content and language in ways that reinforce connections in memory as well as increase depth of processing. I think it makes sense if teachers look at it from a psychological perspective because something can be remembered for a longer period of time if learners take more time to focus on it and then mentally process it. This idea of counterbalance seems to be the basis for Dr. Lyster’s proactive and reactive approaches to content and language integration.

Fourth and the most interesting point of all is Dr. Lyster’s instructional sequence for integrating language and content. To explain the noticing and awareness steps of his instructional sequence, he shows the video of a moon-walking bear that walks through two teams passing balls among the same team members. The first time I encountered a video of awareness test was in the cognitive psychology class back in my undergraduate, and I learned from the course that most of the viewers would not notice another object or person changing or moving if they did not know about selective attention in advance. Thus, it is interesting to see Dr. Lyster labeling certain grammar points like conjugation and gender as moon-walking bears, which can be learned more attentively to learners through guided and autonomous practices.

My last comment is on the notion of corrective feedback (CF). Dr. Lyster makes a rather surprising remark that teachers are reluctant to provide CF assuming that students prefer not to be corrected. Honestly, I feel uncomfortable to know that there are teachers who hesitate to correct their students. If CF is verified to be effective by four recent meta-analyses and even most effective during interaction among students, then I would strongly argue that after receiving proper training and information of CF types, all language teachers should at least consider trying to give CF to their students and then observe for its effectiveness. Personally, I would like to learn more about scaffolding functions behind recasts as well as output hypothesis and skill acquisition theory behind prompts.

Overall, I truly enjoyed listening to Dr. Lyster’s presentation on proactive and reactive approaches to integrating language and content. I must say that this topic makes me realize how much I have missed studying psychology ever since I got my Bachelor of Science in psychology. In this sense, language acquisition intrigues me very much as it connects two fields of study that I love the most: language and psychology.

“Proactive and Reactive Approaches to Integrating Language and Content.”

Roy Lyster, of McGill University, entitled his talk “Proactive and Reactive Approaches to Integrating Language and Content.”

– Cognitive benefits of bilingualism – selective attention – the ability to focus on relevant information related to the immediate task and screen out irrelevant information; Benefits persist into adulthood; can slow down onset of Alzheimer’s.

– However, attention to language stuff needs to “manipulated” or enhanced during content teaching. + Linguistic objectives need to be planned alongside content based objectives.

– Initial attempt at CBI showed students did not have native like production skills in lexical variety, sociolinguistic appropriateness nor accuracy. – Resultant studies demonstrated that teacher talk/input/instruction only used a restricted lexical base and type of tense. (75% of tenses were present or imperative form; 15% in past tense; 3% in conditional dense)

We can understand discourse without precise syntactic and morphological knowledge ~ We can process meaning in ways that are not encoded in a specific language – body language, gesture, pitch variation, emphasis, props etc.

Form focused instruction – this was something that I heard for the first time. What does it mean?

Context in which learning occurs should resemble the context in which the learning will be put to use.

Doctor Lyster liked his idea of counterbalancing language and content.

Shifting attention between language and content is very good for depth of processing. 

He said typological enhancement- which pragmatically means bolding the faunt of a grammar usage you want to emphasize, or being extra sure to verbally enunciate and accent a point you want to distinguish.

  1. Noticing – highlight ideas, look at subtitles, scan for content
  2. Awareness – look more closely at a text and make your language point explicit
  3. Guided practice – make them manipulate the grammar point in a fun and guided manner – he suggested riddles
  4. Autonomous practice- free response prompting questions, but be sure that they still manipulate the grammar thingy well

 

Skill acquisition theory – declarative knowledge -> it is important to proceduralize knowledge during spontaneous language instruction.

He echoed what we just learned in SOE about teaching new vocabulary with gender markers, as chunks which get stored as 1 item in the lexicon. So for English – by the way, a dog, a cat, the dog, the cat, on the way,

Edu.glogster.com -Multimedia Interactive Poster – might be a really useful tool for online group projects

From Mr. Rogers query – use authentic text, but embellish it, or use in awareness raising work.

Usually need resources to do CBI well – more than a threshold level for the teachers, at least a threshold level for students, but it can be orchestrated to work with young learners as well.

Feedback –Prompting vs. Correcting

-corrective recasting is equally useful as prompting, for adults

Prompting is more useful than recasting for kids – there is already a great deal of repetition in circle time stuff, so kids may not be able to pick up when they are being corrected and when they are just being copied by the teacher

Other types are clarification requests – S. Billy ate five fried chicken. -> T. Billy ate five what?

Is the term epistemic feedback only used in writing, or just as another type of prompting feedback? E.g.  What did you mean by this, what were other examples?

 

Aaron’s post

Nuestro Libro

20151211_114128 20151218_094418 20151218_094428 20151218_094448 20151218_094502

Hi Friends!

I just wanted to share with you the final product of my Make-A-Book booth at the Pedagogical Trade Fair. My booth consisted of three different variations of a make-a-book activity for various levels of learners: an about me/about my family book, a personal dictionary and class dictionary, and a mini short story. (Read more about this in detail in my Pedagogical Repertoire!)

Everyone who visited my booth contributed to a collective book, and I have posted the pictures above. I love having an artifact that represents a collective effort as well as a shared experience, and I greatly enjoyed sharing this experience with all of you. Have a great break everyone!

Jerry’s Korean Vocab Review Game

4x4 Square Board

Description

  • This fun activity is designed to help Korean language learners practice and memorize previously learned Korean vocabulary with other peers on the similar level of fluency. Because of its simplicity, it is suitable for beginners who pair up with one other partner.

Instructions

  • Before the game:
  1. Set up the square with a partner (each side has all the new words).
  2. Roll a die to decide the play order (whoever rolls the highest goes first).
  • During the game:
  1. Take turns rolling the die and then moving one’s own piece clockwise.
  2. Give meaning and pronunciation of a word on which one’s own piece lands and then take the word if he or she answers them correctly (the other player can answer if he or she misses either one, and the word is removed if no player answers them correctly).
  3. Four blanks at each corner of the square are free to take with no answer.
  4. The players continue playing until all the words are cleared.
  • After the game:
  1. The player with most words wins (each blank is counted as a word).

Bloom’s Taxonomy

1st Level: Remembering

  • The participants exhibit memory of previously learned Korean vocabulary by correctly recalling meaning and pronunciation of each Korean word.

Crabbe’s Learning Opportunities

2nd Concept: Output

  • The participants produce previously learned Korean words in spoken form.

3rd Concept: Interaction

  • The participants communicate with each other in this simulated situation.

4th Concept: Feedback

  • The participants receive information or correction about their performance.

5th Concept: Rehearsal

  • The participants deliberately repeat previously learned Korean words.

Monterey Way Precepts

2nd: Output and Interaction

  • The participants are provided with a chance to practice previously learned Korean words in this interactive task.

5th: Positive Affect

  • The participants build and maintain individual confidence and motivation by appreciating and supporting each other through mutual help.

Pedagogical Variations

  • It can be used as either a warm-up exercise at the beginning of class or a review exercise at the end of class.
  • It can be played by more than two people as individuals or in teams depending on class size.
  • It can be applied to practicing and memorizing vocabulary of other languages as well.
  • It can include as many words for each side of the square as needed; if there is # number of words to be learned, then the square will be formed in #×#.

Trifold

Geography game (Pedagogical trade fair)

I made a geography game for the pedagogical trade fair. It was designed to help familiarize participants with the countries of the Arab world and to raise awareness about some Arab geographers who have made important contributions, all while having fun.

My game consisted of a blank map of the Middle East with a stack of small cards with the names of the countries written on them. On the backs of the cards were clues to help the students if they weren’t sure of where to place a country.

There were three stacks of cards with the map. The first stack had the country names written in English, the second had them written in Arabic transliterated into English letters, and the third stack had the country names written in Arabic.

I would use this activity with adult students or in a college class near the start of a beginning class in Arabic, both in order to teach the geography of the Arab countries and to familiarize the students with the Arabic alphabet.

I think it was a success overall, both in the learning part and in the having fun part. The participants had more fun and did better when they used the hints written on the backs of the cards, so if I did it again, I would present the hints as the primary option, rather than as a backup plan to use only if needed. This is because some participants seemed intimidated by the large number of unknown countries and were too embarrassed to use the hints. This led some people not to try to complete the activity. However, people who used the hints stuck with it and enjoyed it.

 

This post was written by Josiah

English Thrü Music: A Project Based Approach

Class Group Activity for Project Based Instruction: Observation of in-class demonstration
1. Defining Terms – The groups were given envelopes with definitions and terms relating to project based instruction. Some examples include, task, lesson plan, unit plan, syllabus, etc.
2. Sorting Projects– We looked at examples of different projects and decided if they would fit as an in-class project, and in-class and community project, or a community project.
3. Selecting Appropriate Projects/ Apples to Apples: Project based learning – Given a set of parameters describing the students in a class and what their strengths and weaknesses were, we had to select from a pile a project that would best suit the situation.
4. Planning a Project – We reviewed the terms and project ideas from the previous activities and decided on a context to plan a project based syllabus (either unit based or course based). We had to decide on the students’ proficiency level, their needs and interests, and the focus of the course. On a large piece of paper, we planned the syllabus and noted the main activities and outcomes at each stage. This was a great opportunity to bounce ideas off one another and create a cohesive course design (a nice intro to curriculum design!)
5. Group Presentation – Each group presented their poster discussing the type of project (Unit based or Course based), describing the context and level of the students, and the specific components within the syllabus. Each syllabus design was unique in the topics covered and their context.

image1 (1)

~ Our project is designed for an intermediate ESL class. The students are motivated by music and using social media. Incorporated into learning English through studying musical genres is a functional aspect focused on being a consumer (buying concert tickets and organizing transportation to a concert) and on promoting a music event (designing promotional materials that include the essential information). The students also have the opportunity to engage with the community by conducting interviews about music preferences and have the option to use social media for their final project, which is to promote a concert or other music related event.

  English Thrü Music Composition and Accent: An Arpeggiated Ascent
  Unit/ Topic

Tasks/Assignments

Week 1 An Historical Survey of World Music

Short written report: students choose topic (musician, composer, singer, etc.)

DUE: End of week 3

Week 2 Continue with Historical Survey   discuss course syllabus and project deadlines
Week 3 English in Use: buying tickets, finding venues, arranging transportation  
Week 4  

Discuss oral interview guidelines

DUE: End of week 6

Week 5 Sweuite (Sweet/Suite) Street Beats: Interviews about music  
Week 6 Music and Media: Programs & publicity in preparation for week 7

Begin final presentation: Program Design

DUE: End of week 9

Week 7 Continue with Programs and Publicity  
Week 8 THE CONCERT  
Week 9 Final Presentation/ Magnum Opus  

Post by: Catherine Purdy, Phil Martin, Aaron Ensman

Pedagogical Repertoire: A Collaborative Compelation

Below are 16 pedagogical tasks that Sara, Catherine, Sally and Annabelle wrote and compiled together to make an in depth pedagogical repertoire. We hope you all find it helpful!

Coffee or Tea?

discussing tastes

Level: elementary/intermediated

Learner outcomes: group cohesion, sharing personal experiences,  expressing feelings and preferences, simple present, like + gerund.

Procedure: This activity allows students to break out of their normal groups and work with new classmates. The teacher will draw a matrix on the blackboard like this:

I prefer
coffee
tea
beer
 
 
wine
 
 

The teacher can choose any two pairs for the matrix, for example, cats and dogs, summer and winter. Any category that is appropriate for the age and grade level and which is likely to split the students. Students should place themselves in the matrix by their preferences, and each matrix will be assigned to a different corner of the classroom.

Within their groups, the students can discuss several topics. If the groups are too big, students can decide how to split themselves into smaller groups based on more specific preferences (for example, what kind of coffee or tea). If the students are beginners, they can simply have a conversation about other preferences they have in common. A third idea is to have the students practice the recognition of categories by having them in groups make a list of things that everyone in the group likes. The group members should then arrange them in categories.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. 69-70

Making ends meet

combining sentence halves

Level: elementary/intermediate

Learner outcomes: cooperation, creativity, sentence structure, conditionals

“This activity requires students to rethink their ideas and try to reshape them so that they match their partners’. It may also provide useful practice in conditionals.

Procedure: Divide the class into two equal groups. Write a conditional sentence on the blackboard, marking the ‘if clause’ and the ‘result clause’. Then, ask students to work on their own and write three to five half sentences, students in one group writing if clauses, those in the other group writing result clauses. When they have finished, ask them to find a partner from the other group, look at the sentence halves they have, and try to put together meaningful sentences. They can make any necessary changes and create some amusing or unusual combinations, as long as they can explain the situation they had in mind (see the examples below). You may follow with a whole class discussion on the criteria (of grammar and meaning) of matching sentence halves.

If I have time… …I’ll buy a new car.

If you read this letter… …he will go to work.

If you wash my car… …he watches TV.

Variation:

You may apply this activity to any other grammatical pattern that includes two distinct parts of a sentence, such as the simple past-past continuous contrast or sentences with temporal clauses.”

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg. 66-67

Making Rain

inventing a group ritual

Level: intermediate/advanced

Learner Outcomes: group cohesion, creativity,  oral fluency practice

This activity invites students to think about the role of rituals in their communities. Students will think of examples of rituals that they experience in their daily lives and rituals they know about in other societies. Students will then form groups and choose a function which is relevant to everyone in the group, for example, greeting, celebrating, or passing an exam. The group will then invent a new ritual for the group to practice and make a presentation about it for the rest of the class.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg.73

Co-authors

writing a 50 word story in pairs

Level: elementary/intermediate/advanced

Learner outcomes: cooperation, personalizing input, vocabulary review, written fluency practice, patterns of reduction

Procedure: This activity is an opportunity for students to work together with a very strict structure. The teacher will read an example 50 word story to the students at the beginning of the class. Students should each pick four to six useful words from the most recent vocabulary test or text that they read. Then they should form pairs, and each pair of students will combine their list of words. Together, they will write a 50 word story using all of the words. An optional final step is for students to discuss in pairs or as a class how they divided tasks, made decisions, and chose a pair leader (if they had one).

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy, Cambridge 2000, pg. 67-68​

What’s important in a teacher?

Learning outcomes: Applying new vocabulary (adjectives), reflection on one’s own experience, focus on personal learning goals

Procedure: Instructor writes the word “teacher” on the board and asks the learners to think of words or phrases that come to mind. The teacher then divides the board into two columns, one labeled “good” and one labeled “bad.” The learners are now asked to think of specific words or phrases that fall into either category and they are jotted down under either column. After the students have had time to share, they are given a list of positive adjectives that could be used to describe a teacher they like/have liked. The students work individually or in small groups to circle the qualities they like in a teacher and have room to add more. They are split into pairs and tell each other what qualities they like in a teacher and tell their partner about a teacher they have liked in the past. At the end, the students are asked to finish off the lesson by completing the statement, “I think a good teacher has to be…” using their circled qualities. In addition, time permitting, a list of negative adjectives can be used and the activity can be done looking at the bad qualities of a teacher.

 

Deflecting questions

Learning outcomes: becoming aware of avoidance techniques, becoming aware of politeness, cultural awareness

Procedure: Give the students a list of questions containing some that are more impersonal (Ex. Where do you go to school?) and others that are more personal (Ex. How old are you?) Have them talk in a small group and identify which questions are appropriate to ask and which ones would be appropriate to ask, applying this to what they know about American culture and also applying their own culture. After each student has identified at least two questions that they would not like to be asked when first meeting someone, they class will reconvene. The teacher can start with a sample sentence such as “How old are you?” and write it on the board. The students will be asked what they think are some ways to avoid answering, given four categories: partial answers (ex. I’m in my 30s), jocular answers (ex. Old enough to drink), firm but friendly refusal to answer (ex. Old enough to know you shouldn’t ask me that), and confrontational answers (ex. That’s none of your business). The students are then split into groups and think of ways to answer the two personal questions they chose in each category. Once they have had a chance to do so, they walk around the class and ask these personal questions to each other, practicing their deflection strategies.

Making people laugh

Learning outcomes: becoming more comfortable in class environment, culture awareness

Procedure: The learners are divided into two groups, A and B. Group A have to remain serious throughout the first part of the activity and group B have a task of changing that. Both groups face each other and B has to try to make group A laugh using verbal means but it can also include gestures, body language, etc. After a few minutes, the teacher asks how many times group B could make group A laugh and what specifically made them laugh. They exchange roles and after a few minutes the teacher asks the same questions again. If the students have specific examples of what made their partner from the other group laugh, they can share that with the class.

Questions and answers about a famous person

Learning outcomes: using authentic materials/texts, formatting questions, using simple past

Procedure: The students are asked about famous people who they are interested in learning more about, such a musician, actor, author, athlete, etc. After getting suggestions from the students, the teacher writes all the names up on the board and have the class agree on one or two people from the list that they find interesting. For homework the students will gather questions about the famous person and some facts (new ones or some that they may already know about them). Next lesson the students share their notes (questions and facts) with a partner and see if they have similar questions or if their partner has the answer to any of those questions. Lastly, the class reconvenes and asks their remaining questions and let the students guide to the answers. When there are questions left over, either have the teacher look up the remaining questions or have students who are particularly interested in the famous person do the rest of the research for the next class. This activity can also be used as a segue to a lesson about a specific person, so the students might not necessarily have a choice in picking the target. ​

4 square organization task:

Learning outcomes: ability to notice similarities and differences, recall of vocabulary or key concepts, review.

Procedure: The 4 square tool is a graphic organizer that works similarly to a mind map. It is a box that is divided into four squares with a small box in the middle (at the intersection) for the topic or theme of the activity. The four boxes are used to group similar concepts and segregate less similar concepts that fall under the umbrella of the main theme of the activity. An example for this for our class could be: Theme (types of learning strategies); with box 1 about perceptual learning strategies; box 2 about cognitive strategies; box 3 about metacognitive strategies; and box 4 about affective learning strategies. For each box students could work individually or together to brainstorm key terms and concepts for each of the 4 strategies.

Stations- practicing language skills:

Learning outcomes: review vocabulary/sentences patterns, practice using different language skills, interpersonal and problems solving skills development.

Procedures: Stations can be a very effective use of time, especially in a class with a lot of learners. The idea is that each station has a designated area in the classroom with clear directions and an activity that learners can do relatively autonomously. It is imperative that each station have clear directions and that students’ have a general idea of what they must do at each station. The activities should take an equal amount of time. Using a timer that is projected onto the board to count down the amount of time for each station can be very helpful. With language learners it can be particularly helpful to have a stations that focus on these four skills (although there are certainly others available): a reading station, a listening station, a writing station, and a speaking station.

Treasure hunt-find your way in English:

Learning outcomes: review of sentence structures and vocabulary, practical application practice with prepositions, reading/listening/writing skills, problem solving skills.

Procedure: Treasure hunts can be very useful and fun, especially with younger learners. They are particularly helpful for review directions, object names (desk, table, chair, window etc.), and prepositions. A nice way to make a treasure hunt interactive for the whole class is to have each student find one clue. Once they’ve found the clue they must give it to the next student who uses this to find the clue after. To make sure students are engaged even when it is not there turn teachers can ask students to write down the clues in order by listening to their peers read the clues aloud. It is good to have some kind of reward in the final placement as motivation for the students to continue the hunt.

Do you agree?

Learning outcomes: students practice listening skills, students practice expressing (dis)agreement, review of past vocabulary and sentence patterns.

Procedure: This activity is useful for helping students practice their listening and speaking. It is also a nice way to break up the class with some kinesthetic learning. For the activity the classroom will need to be cleared so there is some space for running. There can be a yes poster and a no poster that are taped to opposite walls or the classroom can be divided down the middle with tape. The teacher (or one student at a time) make a statement for the whole class to hear. The other students run to the yes or no sides of the classroom to express their (dis)agreement with the statement. In their groups students talk together about why they agree or disagree.

Information Gap Activity: Maps (listening)

Learner outcomes: review of vocabulary and sentence structures, practice speaking, listening and writing.

Procedure: Give students identical maps, but with some road and building names removed. Map A should have the information that is not on Map B and vice versa. This could be done after a lesson teaching prepositions of place (on, at, across from, next to, etc). Collaboratively, but without showing each other their maps, the students must find out the missing names using questions like these:

What’s the name of the road across from the post office?

What building is on the left of the post office?

 Once the maps are completed, students agree on a starting point. Student A then directs Student B to a destination unknown to Student B. When the instructions are complete, the student who has been following the instructions should end up in the right place. Some instruction about giving directions should introduce this activity (go along, turn left, turn right, on the corner, go past…)

Adapted from Gibbons Ch. 6 on Scaffolding Listening

 The Picture Jigsaw

Learner outcomes: fluency practice, vocabulary reinforcement, listening, writing

Level: intermediate-advanced

Time: 20-30 minutes

Preparation: Have as many interesting pictures as you will have small groups in your class. They may be the kind of pictures that make a story or any kind of pictures. Try to include some pictures of people.

Procedure:

Divide your class into small groups

  1. Each group gets a picture
  2. The group studies the picture and students decide how to best describe it.
  3. Students put down the picture and describe it without looking at it.
  4. Students look at the picture again to see if they have forgotten anything.
  5. Collect the pictures.
  6. Students meet in new small groups. In each small group there should be a representative of each picture.
  7. Students tell one another about their pictures.
  8. While all students in the groups contribute, a secretary writes the story they create around the pictures.
  9. Place all the pictures in a visible place.
  10. A representative from each group reads the group’s story, while you re-arrange the pictures as they appear in the story if they make one.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

 

If I Won the Lottery

Learner outcomes: to teach present unreal conditional sentences and to give the learners a break in the lesson as they imagine something they might like to do. (The present unreal condition refers to a situation that is contrary to fact or not the case.  The speaker is imagining what would happen if the situation were different from what it actually is.) Reading comprehension and speaking.

Time: 20-30 Minutes

Procedure:

  1. Bring in an ad or newspaper article about the lottery to facilitate a group introductory discussion – how often do drawings occur, what amounts of money can be won etc.
  2. Read or tell a story about someone who actually won a lottery (news article).
  3. Have the students imagine that they have won the lottery and ask them to also imagine what they would do if they won the lottery.
  4. Share your own thoughts, using the conditional clause “If I won the lottery, I would…” This will demonstrate the appropriate sentence structure for the students to use.  Write it on the board so students can reference it.
  5. Invite the students to share with a partner what they would do and then share with the whole group.
  6. As follow up questions to the student responses to extend the discussion (ex: if a student says, “If I won the lottery, I would travel around the world.”, you could ask “How long would your trip last?” “What countries would you visit?”… you could also involve other learners by asking “Who else would like to go on this trip?”)
  7. Provide the learners with other conditional examples using if/would:
  1. If Bill asked Helen to marry him, she would say yes.
  2. If my brother visited us at Christmas, I would be very happy.

 

Pronoun Search

Learner outcomes: grammar review, scanning a text

Level: beginners-intermediate

Preparation: Choose a text that has a variety of pronouns in it, preferable a text that you have already studied with your students.

Procedure

  1. Explain that a pronoun is a word that takes the place of a noun. Examples: I, you, he, she, it, we, you, they, who, whom.
  2. In small groups, students find as many pronouns and antecedents (the word that the pronoun refers to) as they can in the text.
  3. The first group reads out the pronouns and antecedents they found in the first sentence of the text. As soon as a pronoun is mentioned, it is crossed off everyone’s list.
  4. The second group does the same with the next sentence. Continue until the text has been covered. The group that has a pronoun that one has found is the winner.

Variation: You can do the same activity with a variety of grammatical categories like verbs, adjectives, or nouns.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

Thanks so much and happy teaching everyone!

 Sara, Catherine, Sally & Annabelle

reflection-positives and negatives of language learning

Positives and Negatives

The four positives we chose today were: connection, intercultural competence, engagement, and accomplishment. Among the four, intercultural competence seems to be the most significant one. The ultimate goal of learning a language is to properly interact in the target language culture and having intercultural competence makes us survive this globalized world, while at the same times being capable of using languages as a key to open various doors—different aspects/fields of daily life.

The four negatives were: frustration, boredom, anxiety, and insecurity. Being aware of the fact that anxiety might “greatly influence a student’s language learning” is something a teacher should always keep in mind. Anxiety might sometimes stop students from learning actively; however, it can also be the reason that motivates students to practice more, and to push themselves to a higher level.

-Chung-Hui Kim Liao