Author Archives: Annabelle Royer

Roy Lyster’s Talk

On Friday, I attended Roy Lyster’s talk on Proactive and reactive approaches to integrated language & content. 

I was really impressed by his clarity in presenting ideas, the extent of his experience and research, as well as the wealth of information he’s gathered from his work. I particularly enjoyed his explanation of the proactive model to curriculum design. Here is what I took away from this discussion:

Immersion does not harm L1, it can actually enhance it. However, immersion students still had trouble with grammatical accuracy, lexical language, & sociolinguistic appropriateness.

These difficulties arose for immersion students’ because their input, from teachers, was limited in tense, aspect and other elements of language that native speakers are exposed to.

Roy’s research, and others’, shows that language can be learned by bypassing grammar and focusing on communicative competence (which is what happens in CBI courses and immersion programs sometimes). However, a direct and contextualized focus on grammar can help solve the non-native issues may immersion and language learners face.

CBI contextualizes language in content and builds pathways to language that are strongly associated with topics. To do this teachers should design their course (or cross disciplinary courses) so that the focus on content bookends the focus on language and grammar learning.

Roy’s proactive approach sequence:

noticing (language during content)

awareness (metalinguistic reflection,  noticing patterns)

guided practice (Ss use new grammar/lexical/language in meaningful content driven tasks)

Autonomous practice (a return to content information where Ss are expected to use the newly learned language skills as well)

 

I think this system is very useful for designing a curriculum because it can be used at the syllabus stage, the unit stage, the lesson plan stage, or even at the individual task stage. I think this approach would be very useful to use in the language classroom that has a focus on other areas of the culture (environmentalism, holidays etc.)

Informal Observation 1: Chinese BUILD

For this observation, I observed Kelly’s beginner level Chinese class. The lesson only had one student arrive so Kelly adapted her lesson plan so that it was suitable for a tutoring session.

She started by reviewing numbers 1-10 in Chinese with the student (pronunciation, tones, & writing). She then asked the student if she remembered how to make higher numbers. The student iterated the correct rule for creating numbers between 11-99. Kelly helped her write the rule down and practice orally producing several of these numbers. She then asked the student if she remembered the measure word for 100. The student did not so Kelly taught it and they practiced making numbers between 1-999. They practiced by speaking in Chinese and translating to English and vice versa. Kelly also asked the student to practice writing the characters.

The next part of the lesson used the numbers in sentences. The first sentence was: “What time is it?” and answering: “It’s ___.” Kelly asked the student if she recognized the characters and explained the ones she didn’t know.

After practicing asking and telling the time (integrating numbers). They then learned how to ask “when were you born?” and answer “I was born on ____.” This sentence pattern used a lot of the vocabulary that was already taught. Kelly used a game with flashcard to help the student practice the sentence patterns.

During this lesson Kelly used a lot of questions to raise the student’s awareness of her own knowledge of the language and to make connections between learned and new information. She also encouraged the student’s autonomy by asking her to make rules and use her own knowledge to decode the language. Kelly also used contextualized input and output by having the student practice using the question and sentence patterns with the observers (2 spoke Chinese) and to tell the actual time.

The flashcard game at the end was an entertaining way to practice repetition drills that seemed to raise the student’s motivation. The student already had a pretty high motivation to learn the language, but Kelly continued to engage and raise her motivation by making the lesson enjoyable.

I really enjoyed how Kelly scaffolded the lesson so that they worked from small units (numbers) to using those units in more complicated sentence patterns. I would love to do this in my own language classes in the future. I would also like to encourage my students’ autonomy by asking them to use their own knowledge of the language to find underlying rules to decode the grammar.

Informal Observation 1: A Youtube lesson-teaching in China day 1

I observed a 30 minute lesson on youtube that was set in China and taught by a British teacher who was new to the class. She was teaching what appeared to be about 60 high school students (the video wasn’t explicit). Her lesson was designed so that students first received input from her, practiced question and sentence patterns as a whole class, some students then demonstrated in front of the class, then everyone practiced with a partner and then some students modeled in front of the class. There was some writing integrated by copying from the board into their notebooks at the end as well.

The first 10 minutes of the lesson was dedicated to the teacher introducing herself and asking yes/no questions of the students about their lives. The students seemed to have a fairly high comprehension level for the introductory level of the class (they laughed at all of the teachers English jokes).

The topics in the lesson were: introductions, likes/dislikes, and hobbies. The teacher also reviewed some basic titles (mother, father, parents, brothers) and hobbies (there were a lot, although only one the students did not know “sewing” which the teacher used drawing and TPR to explain). The sentence patterns specifically taught and practiced were “What’s your name?” “My name is…”; “What do you like?” “I like…” “I don’t like…”; “What are your hobbies?” “My hobby is…”

After introducing and practicing these sentence patterns and hobbies (by repeating after the teacher 3x) the teacher asked several students to come to the front of the room and model meeting someone and asking about their likes/hobbies. She did this a couple times and then asked students to practice together in pairs (2x). After the pair work practice she asked more students to come to the front and asked them questions about their partner. After several of these pairs came up the teacher asked the students to copy the sentence patterns and hobby words from the board into their notebooks.

During this lesson the teacher used the communicative approach; there was no translation or Chinese spoken in the classroom by the teacher or students. Also, although there was some writing on the board and copying at the end, the majority of the lesson was dedicated to listening input and oral production output.

The input was somewhat contextualized as the introduction lesson was appropriate considering the teacher was new (it was not clear if the students were new as well). The output was, in this sense, also contextualized and definitely cooperative. There wasn’t much in regards to awareness raising,  learner autonomy and self-regulating, and/or affect/motivation.

The positives that I noticed and would try to emulate were: the teacher’s energy and excitement in the classroom, she had the students practicing and repeating a lot, and she had at least some of the lesson centered around the students.

The negatives that I noticed and would try to avoid were: even though the students comprehension was high and this was clearly review, she didn’t take the opportunity to allow them to practice using the language more creatively; it was very structured and teacher centered for the majority of the lesson. Also she corrected the students’ when they called soccer ‘soccer’ saying that in the UK it’s called ‘football’. I think raising their awareness of cultural differences is important, but not at the expense of potentially engaging their affective filter to block their learning.

Pedagogical Repertoire: A Collaborative Compelation

Below are 16 pedagogical tasks that Sara, Catherine, Sally and Annabelle wrote and compiled together to make an in depth pedagogical repertoire. We hope you all find it helpful!

Coffee or Tea?

discussing tastes

Level: elementary/intermediated

Learner outcomes: group cohesion, sharing personal experiences,  expressing feelings and preferences, simple present, like + gerund.

Procedure: This activity allows students to break out of their normal groups and work with new classmates. The teacher will draw a matrix on the blackboard like this:

I prefer
coffee
tea
beer
 
 
wine
 
 

The teacher can choose any two pairs for the matrix, for example, cats and dogs, summer and winter. Any category that is appropriate for the age and grade level and which is likely to split the students. Students should place themselves in the matrix by their preferences, and each matrix will be assigned to a different corner of the classroom.

Within their groups, the students can discuss several topics. If the groups are too big, students can decide how to split themselves into smaller groups based on more specific preferences (for example, what kind of coffee or tea). If the students are beginners, they can simply have a conversation about other preferences they have in common. A third idea is to have the students practice the recognition of categories by having them in groups make a list of things that everyone in the group likes. The group members should then arrange them in categories.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. 69-70

Making ends meet

combining sentence halves

Level: elementary/intermediate

Learner outcomes: cooperation, creativity, sentence structure, conditionals

“This activity requires students to rethink their ideas and try to reshape them so that they match their partners’. It may also provide useful practice in conditionals.

Procedure: Divide the class into two equal groups. Write a conditional sentence on the blackboard, marking the ‘if clause’ and the ‘result clause’. Then, ask students to work on their own and write three to five half sentences, students in one group writing if clauses, those in the other group writing result clauses. When they have finished, ask them to find a partner from the other group, look at the sentence halves they have, and try to put together meaningful sentences. They can make any necessary changes and create some amusing or unusual combinations, as long as they can explain the situation they had in mind (see the examples below). You may follow with a whole class discussion on the criteria (of grammar and meaning) of matching sentence halves.

If I have time… …I’ll buy a new car.

If you read this letter… …he will go to work.

If you wash my car… …he watches TV.

Variation:

You may apply this activity to any other grammatical pattern that includes two distinct parts of a sentence, such as the simple past-past continuous contrast or sentences with temporal clauses.”

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg. 66-67

Making Rain

inventing a group ritual

Level: intermediate/advanced

Learner Outcomes: group cohesion, creativity,  oral fluency practice

This activity invites students to think about the role of rituals in their communities. Students will think of examples of rituals that they experience in their daily lives and rituals they know about in other societies. Students will then form groups and choose a function which is relevant to everyone in the group, for example, greeting, celebrating, or passing an exam. The group will then invent a new ritual for the group to practice and make a presentation about it for the rest of the class.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg.73

Co-authors

writing a 50 word story in pairs

Level: elementary/intermediate/advanced

Learner outcomes: cooperation, personalizing input, vocabulary review, written fluency practice, patterns of reduction

Procedure: This activity is an opportunity for students to work together with a very strict structure. The teacher will read an example 50 word story to the students at the beginning of the class. Students should each pick four to six useful words from the most recent vocabulary test or text that they read. Then they should form pairs, and each pair of students will combine their list of words. Together, they will write a 50 word story using all of the words. An optional final step is for students to discuss in pairs or as a class how they divided tasks, made decisions, and chose a pair leader (if they had one).

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy, Cambridge 2000, pg. 67-68​

What’s important in a teacher?

Learning outcomes: Applying new vocabulary (adjectives), reflection on one’s own experience, focus on personal learning goals

Procedure: Instructor writes the word “teacher” on the board and asks the learners to think of words or phrases that come to mind. The teacher then divides the board into two columns, one labeled “good” and one labeled “bad.” The learners are now asked to think of specific words or phrases that fall into either category and they are jotted down under either column. After the students have had time to share, they are given a list of positive adjectives that could be used to describe a teacher they like/have liked. The students work individually or in small groups to circle the qualities they like in a teacher and have room to add more. They are split into pairs and tell each other what qualities they like in a teacher and tell their partner about a teacher they have liked in the past. At the end, the students are asked to finish off the lesson by completing the statement, “I think a good teacher has to be…” using their circled qualities. In addition, time permitting, a list of negative adjectives can be used and the activity can be done looking at the bad qualities of a teacher.

 

Deflecting questions

Learning outcomes: becoming aware of avoidance techniques, becoming aware of politeness, cultural awareness

Procedure: Give the students a list of questions containing some that are more impersonal (Ex. Where do you go to school?) and others that are more personal (Ex. How old are you?) Have them talk in a small group and identify which questions are appropriate to ask and which ones would be appropriate to ask, applying this to what they know about American culture and also applying their own culture. After each student has identified at least two questions that they would not like to be asked when first meeting someone, they class will reconvene. The teacher can start with a sample sentence such as “How old are you?” and write it on the board. The students will be asked what they think are some ways to avoid answering, given four categories: partial answers (ex. I’m in my 30s), jocular answers (ex. Old enough to drink), firm but friendly refusal to answer (ex. Old enough to know you shouldn’t ask me that), and confrontational answers (ex. That’s none of your business). The students are then split into groups and think of ways to answer the two personal questions they chose in each category. Once they have had a chance to do so, they walk around the class and ask these personal questions to each other, practicing their deflection strategies.

Making people laugh

Learning outcomes: becoming more comfortable in class environment, culture awareness

Procedure: The learners are divided into two groups, A and B. Group A have to remain serious throughout the first part of the activity and group B have a task of changing that. Both groups face each other and B has to try to make group A laugh using verbal means but it can also include gestures, body language, etc. After a few minutes, the teacher asks how many times group B could make group A laugh and what specifically made them laugh. They exchange roles and after a few minutes the teacher asks the same questions again. If the students have specific examples of what made their partner from the other group laugh, they can share that with the class.

Questions and answers about a famous person

Learning outcomes: using authentic materials/texts, formatting questions, using simple past

Procedure: The students are asked about famous people who they are interested in learning more about, such a musician, actor, author, athlete, etc. After getting suggestions from the students, the teacher writes all the names up on the board and have the class agree on one or two people from the list that they find interesting. For homework the students will gather questions about the famous person and some facts (new ones or some that they may already know about them). Next lesson the students share their notes (questions and facts) with a partner and see if they have similar questions or if their partner has the answer to any of those questions. Lastly, the class reconvenes and asks their remaining questions and let the students guide to the answers. When there are questions left over, either have the teacher look up the remaining questions or have students who are particularly interested in the famous person do the rest of the research for the next class. This activity can also be used as a segue to a lesson about a specific person, so the students might not necessarily have a choice in picking the target. ​

4 square organization task:

Learning outcomes: ability to notice similarities and differences, recall of vocabulary or key concepts, review.

Procedure: The 4 square tool is a graphic organizer that works similarly to a mind map. It is a box that is divided into four squares with a small box in the middle (at the intersection) for the topic or theme of the activity. The four boxes are used to group similar concepts and segregate less similar concepts that fall under the umbrella of the main theme of the activity. An example for this for our class could be: Theme (types of learning strategies); with box 1 about perceptual learning strategies; box 2 about cognitive strategies; box 3 about metacognitive strategies; and box 4 about affective learning strategies. For each box students could work individually or together to brainstorm key terms and concepts for each of the 4 strategies.

Stations- practicing language skills:

Learning outcomes: review vocabulary/sentences patterns, practice using different language skills, interpersonal and problems solving skills development.

Procedures: Stations can be a very effective use of time, especially in a class with a lot of learners. The idea is that each station has a designated area in the classroom with clear directions and an activity that learners can do relatively autonomously. It is imperative that each station have clear directions and that students’ have a general idea of what they must do at each station. The activities should take an equal amount of time. Using a timer that is projected onto the board to count down the amount of time for each station can be very helpful. With language learners it can be particularly helpful to have a stations that focus on these four skills (although there are certainly others available): a reading station, a listening station, a writing station, and a speaking station.

Treasure hunt-find your way in English:

Learning outcomes: review of sentence structures and vocabulary, practical application practice with prepositions, reading/listening/writing skills, problem solving skills.

Procedure: Treasure hunts can be very useful and fun, especially with younger learners. They are particularly helpful for review directions, object names (desk, table, chair, window etc.), and prepositions. A nice way to make a treasure hunt interactive for the whole class is to have each student find one clue. Once they’ve found the clue they must give it to the next student who uses this to find the clue after. To make sure students are engaged even when it is not there turn teachers can ask students to write down the clues in order by listening to their peers read the clues aloud. It is good to have some kind of reward in the final placement as motivation for the students to continue the hunt.

Do you agree?

Learning outcomes: students practice listening skills, students practice expressing (dis)agreement, review of past vocabulary and sentence patterns.

Procedure: This activity is useful for helping students practice their listening and speaking. It is also a nice way to break up the class with some kinesthetic learning. For the activity the classroom will need to be cleared so there is some space for running. There can be a yes poster and a no poster that are taped to opposite walls or the classroom can be divided down the middle with tape. The teacher (or one student at a time) make a statement for the whole class to hear. The other students run to the yes or no sides of the classroom to express their (dis)agreement with the statement. In their groups students talk together about why they agree or disagree.

Information Gap Activity: Maps (listening)

Learner outcomes: review of vocabulary and sentence structures, practice speaking, listening and writing.

Procedure: Give students identical maps, but with some road and building names removed. Map A should have the information that is not on Map B and vice versa. This could be done after a lesson teaching prepositions of place (on, at, across from, next to, etc). Collaboratively, but without showing each other their maps, the students must find out the missing names using questions like these:

What’s the name of the road across from the post office?

What building is on the left of the post office?

 Once the maps are completed, students agree on a starting point. Student A then directs Student B to a destination unknown to Student B. When the instructions are complete, the student who has been following the instructions should end up in the right place. Some instruction about giving directions should introduce this activity (go along, turn left, turn right, on the corner, go past…)

Adapted from Gibbons Ch. 6 on Scaffolding Listening

 The Picture Jigsaw

Learner outcomes: fluency practice, vocabulary reinforcement, listening, writing

Level: intermediate-advanced

Time: 20-30 minutes

Preparation: Have as many interesting pictures as you will have small groups in your class. They may be the kind of pictures that make a story or any kind of pictures. Try to include some pictures of people.

Procedure:

Divide your class into small groups

  1. Each group gets a picture
  2. The group studies the picture and students decide how to best describe it.
  3. Students put down the picture and describe it without looking at it.
  4. Students look at the picture again to see if they have forgotten anything.
  5. Collect the pictures.
  6. Students meet in new small groups. In each small group there should be a representative of each picture.
  7. Students tell one another about their pictures.
  8. While all students in the groups contribute, a secretary writes the story they create around the pictures.
  9. Place all the pictures in a visible place.
  10. A representative from each group reads the group’s story, while you re-arrange the pictures as they appear in the story if they make one.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

 

If I Won the Lottery

Learner outcomes: to teach present unreal conditional sentences and to give the learners a break in the lesson as they imagine something they might like to do. (The present unreal condition refers to a situation that is contrary to fact or not the case.  The speaker is imagining what would happen if the situation were different from what it actually is.) Reading comprehension and speaking.

Time: 20-30 Minutes

Procedure:

  1. Bring in an ad or newspaper article about the lottery to facilitate a group introductory discussion – how often do drawings occur, what amounts of money can be won etc.
  2. Read or tell a story about someone who actually won a lottery (news article).
  3. Have the students imagine that they have won the lottery and ask them to also imagine what they would do if they won the lottery.
  4. Share your own thoughts, using the conditional clause “If I won the lottery, I would…” This will demonstrate the appropriate sentence structure for the students to use.  Write it on the board so students can reference it.
  5. Invite the students to share with a partner what they would do and then share with the whole group.
  6. As follow up questions to the student responses to extend the discussion (ex: if a student says, “If I won the lottery, I would travel around the world.”, you could ask “How long would your trip last?” “What countries would you visit?”… you could also involve other learners by asking “Who else would like to go on this trip?”)
  7. Provide the learners with other conditional examples using if/would:
  1. If Bill asked Helen to marry him, she would say yes.
  2. If my brother visited us at Christmas, I would be very happy.

 

Pronoun Search

Learner outcomes: grammar review, scanning a text

Level: beginners-intermediate

Preparation: Choose a text that has a variety of pronouns in it, preferable a text that you have already studied with your students.

Procedure

  1. Explain that a pronoun is a word that takes the place of a noun. Examples: I, you, he, she, it, we, you, they, who, whom.
  2. In small groups, students find as many pronouns and antecedents (the word that the pronoun refers to) as they can in the text.
  3. The first group reads out the pronouns and antecedents they found in the first sentence of the text. As soon as a pronoun is mentioned, it is crossed off everyone’s list.
  4. The second group does the same with the next sentence. Continue until the text has been covered. The group that has a pronoun that one has found is the winner.

Variation: You can do the same activity with a variety of grammatical categories like verbs, adjectives, or nouns.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

Thanks so much and happy teaching everyone!

 Sara, Catherine, Sally & Annabelle

Meeting ESL students

On Friday Minh, Danna and I met with two of the MIIS ESL students. They were both from Asia; one from China and one from Vietnam. It was a nice mix because Minh is from Vietnam and they enjoyed catching up about their home country and what it’s like living in America. Plus I have a connection with China from my travels there and my time in Taiwan. We all talked about our experiences living abroad in cultures that are very different from our own. We compared stories of fun and excitement as well as homesickness and cooping mechanisms.

I am always interested to see how people’s perceptions of America and Americans change after visiting America. It was a great opportunity to see their reactions. I was surprised that they had both already lived in California for year. The girl from China, Vickey, has already been in the program for a while I believe. I was really impressed by their determination to continually excel. I enjoyed seeing how driven these students were to better their English, even though they were very competent already.

I was intrigued by the questions they asked. Through our book making project and our discussions we learned that they are trying to go to graduate programs in America, but they’re worried about the workload. We warned them it would be a lot of work, but definitely rewarding and an excellent leg up for their futures. The other things the asked about included our favorite TV shows and things we like to do around town. It was a really fluid and relaxed conversation and I’d love the chance to catch up with them again at some point.

Thanks for introducing us to such inspiring students Peter!

Happy Sunday everyone!

Annabelle

Alligator River: Practicing Fluency in the Classroom

In class on Friday, we participated in an example lesson that utilized all four of the language learning skills. This lesson, alligator river, first asked students to listen to a story and use their understanding of word derivations to rate the story’s characters’ morality. We, the students, rated the 5 characters on our own first, then shared our rankings and opinions of those rankings in small groups. We then came to a conclusion as a group about the rankings and shared these with the rest of our class.

Catherine and I really enjoyed the way this activity facilitated a passionate discussion. We think that the story painted such an abominable picture that students were interested in sharing their judgments of the characters. Certain characters were more easily agreed upon than others. This allowed students to practice agreeing and disagreeing with each other, with a focus on communicative fluency. It also provided an opportunity for expression of opinion and debate practice. We very much appreciated the tiered approach this lesson took. It allowed students time to first think and reason with themselves (allowing for development of language expression). Then students worked in groups to practice expressing their opinions, which provides for peer feedback on vocabulary and grammar usage. Finally the group shared their views with the class. This helps all students to feel comfortable sharing their ideas and utilizing language.

The lesson also included a possible station section that allowed students to continue developing their language fluency in areas that they felt comfortable with. We liked how the different language skills were used to help students gain a deeper understanding of the story and self expression in the target language. Students could choose to participate in debate (which focuses on oral fluency), writing a letter (written fluency) or digital exploration of the story (reading fluency). We found this to be a really innovative use of stations in the classroom and both look forward to incorporating it into our future classes. I’ve both used stations in the past but usually as a review of learned knowledge. Catherine has used stations directly after introducing new material as a tactic to delve deeper into the topics at hand. We both felt that this example illustrates a practical use of stations to improve fluency.

Thanks for the useful suggestions Peter. We definitely learned a new way to teach opinion expression, agreement and fluency.

Annabelle & Catherine

Relating to Mindfulness

While watching the video in Monday’s class about mindfulness in schools I was reminded of a video I’d seen about other schools that use mindfulness specifically for teaching students with ADHD. They use it to teach concentration techniques. I used some of these techniques with students in Taiwan. Thought you all might find it interesting. Here is the link to the video.

Application of Metacognitive Learning Strategies during a Language Course

 

For low-intermediate learners and up:

To understand students’ metacognitive strategies and activate their own reflection on when and where studying takes place, a teacher could ask students to fill out a schedule of their week including times of classes, breaks and extracurricular activities. In this way the teacher could help direct student study habits while also reviewing and activating prior learned knowledge i.e. subject names, times etc.

Asking students to incorporate color, drawing or doodles could furthermore reveal different forms of the multiple intelligences for individual learner purposes. This activity assists students with time-management and prioritization habits.

For more advanced learners questionnaires could also be used.

Questions to activate metacognition among students could include:

How do you use English now?

For what purposes would you like to use English?

Under what conditions do you learn best?

How do you like to learn?

The answers to these could direct teacher understanding of student learning styles and goals. With this information teachers could help direct student learning and teach metacognitive strategies that might work best for individual learners and their styles.

Thoughts by: Willow, Annabelle, Ben and Aaron

Life Line Activity: Application for Beginning Learners

This activity could be modified for beginning learners by utilizing more directed questions.

Questions such as: Where are you from? What’s your favorite color? What food do you like? should be explicitly stated in advance of the start of the activity. Teachers should also model this activity. Any advanced students among the groups could lead the activity in a differentiated lesson or group.

Sub-questions or follow up questions could also be supplied to help facilitate conversation among the student groups. Why is that your favorite color? What street did you live on? Who did you live with?

After the game is completed the teacher can quiz each member of the group orally to expose other students to variations of the sentence patterns. This would also provide an opportunity for repetition of sentence patterns among students. This also gets students using different pronouns and verb conjugations, if they are asked about their teammates.

A few other ideas could include: using the activity as a review of past grammatical lessons (ie:  “Write your 3 instructions using present perfect.”), or as a student-led activity (advanced students provide instructions and/or provide sample topics).

 

Thoughts by: Willow, Annabelle, Ben and Aaron