Monthly Archives: November 2015

An overview/observation of the SIOP model

Today in class we watched a video titled: “Helping English Language Learners Succeed: An overview of the SIOP model.” It takes a look at the effects of sheltered instruction on english language learners and the importance of using a consistent model as to maximize affective learning for the learners. The SIOP model was created to help teachers teach students who had limited English language comprehension and its affectivity was assessed using reimposed writing assessments in fall and spring. The students who were in the class of the teachers that had the SIOP training performed better on this writing assessment. Here are my notes/samples on the layout of the SIOP model:

Preparation:
Lesson preparation is key in affective learning
Content and language objectives are set at state and local standards
They post their objectives so students know their learning goals
Adapt content materials to background knowledge of the learners
Encourages teachers to use supplemental materials
Design meaningful activities

Building Background:
Bridging possible gaps in the student’s education
Linking lesson to student lives (ex. reasons why people came to America, connecting these reasons to pilgrims)
Reviewing past lessons with students to help connect to new lesson
Create a familiar routine (ex. Apples)
Key vocabulary (ex. Attaches vocabulary to her shirt)

Comprehensible input:
Making content comprehensible and promoting English language development
Using speech that is appropriate to student’s levels
Explaining academic tasks clearly
Modeling, hands on experiences, visual support

Strategies:
Teachers model strategies and give students chance to practice them
Teacher has students open the book, look at pictures, look at highlighted words, to predict the lesson
Scaffold the instructional activities in class (graphic organizers, prompts…etc.)
Students need a chances to think, reason and reflect

Interaction:
Through discussion students practice key language skills (elaborating, asking questions, etc.)
Pairs, smalls groups, whole group (always start with whole groups)
Native language use can provide students with help without interrupting lesson

Practice and application:
English learners need hands-on materials and kinesthetic exercises
Practicing oral skills and written language

Lesson delivery:
Lesson begins with warm-up to settle students down and also get them thinking about some aspect of the lesson they can relate to
Student reads objectives out loud
Gave a quick background and then jump into lesson
Response groups work together after teacher shows reading and writing tools
When students come to an agreement as a group, they write down their reasons
Lastly they present their ideas and agree or disagree with other groups

Review and assessment:
Assignments, quizzes, and tests
Individual responses and group responses
Teacher can decide to reteach a concept or keep going with lesson based on feedback
Giving feedback to students
Concepts and vocabulary review, calling attention to specific points the students need to remember
Mix and match game with students to find complete equations
Outcome sentences: (I wonder, I think, I feel…) throws a ball and students finish sentence about lesson
Round robin strategy using whiteboard that is passed around and everyone adds something they learned
Look back and see if class met their objective together

Below is a (badly formatted) table of the 5 precepts we went over in class in comparison to the SIOP model.

Precepts SIOP model
 

Contextualized Input

 

Content, gestures, comprehensible input, visuals, key vocabulary, objects, L1

 

Contextualized, co-operative, interactive output

 

Pairs, small groups, group roles, interaction in small groups report back, hands-on tasks

 

Reflection and awareness raising

 

Vocabulary, word of the day

 

Autonomy, self-regulation and development in learning community

 

Explicit objectives and review, strategies, group work

 

Affective dimensions of participation and learning

 

Praise

I appreciate being introduced to the SIOP model, mainly because it gives strategies used in a classroom in a sort of chronological order. It gives me an overview of not only examples of how teacher’s use these strategies, but also why and showing how they are actively useful in a classroom setting. It is all tied in well together, beginning with the objectives being stated out loud and bringing it all together by revisiting them at the end. I also appreciate how this video covered a variety of ages in learners and also subjects, showing how diverse this teaching model can be. It is not limited to teaching language, but can be used in all sorts of environments. I believe that it is also not limited to teaching ELLs but can be used in any type of classroom environment to promote learning.

In praise of Slow Teaching; an ode to my wife

My five year old son Joseph is still in his pajamas at 9:53 on a school day, playing with his two year old sister Elaina back in their bedroom, pretending that they are taking care of baby eagles.

He and his sister were able to sleep in, and when they woke up, we celebrated a morning ritual we call “snuggle buggle”, wherein Laryssa or I sit curled up with them on the couch, under a blanket, and read aloud three library books which they choose.

Joseph is really really into animals and how to classify them right now. This morning he was classifying raptors, of which he believes there are seven kinds: eagles, hawks, falcons, vultures, owls, condors, and a mysterious bird called “the long legged”. Before breakfast he drew a picture of each of these creatures, which he proudly showed to me, and then he asked me how to write each of their names, which I told him how to spell as he carefully wrote each bird’s name next to its picture.

This morning I am really impacted by how much learner autonomy and integration of different subjects there is here. He is learning biology, classification, art, and spelling all at the same time. He decided to do this activity and when to do it. He decided which animals to classify as raptors. He did research, such as when he asked me last night whether a condor is a raptor or not (I checked Wikipedia). He integrated a trip we did last week to Pinnacles National Park, which is where we learned about Condors, along with his current favorite TV show, Wild Kratts, which is a kids show about animals. It was in Wild Kratts that he learned about “the long legged” (not having seen the episode, Laryssa and I can’t help him with what the long legged’s real name might actually be). And now he and his sister are integrating raptors into their play.

Joseph is homeschooled. We have a curriculum for learning to read and another for math, as well as one called Five in a Row, which uses a different children’s book each week. In Five in a Row, the same children’s book is read each day of the school week, and lessons in geography, art, science, or history are drawn from it each day. For example, in a book about a duck which lives on the Yangtze river, we learned where China is on Monday, learned a new art technique for drawing ducks on Tuesday, and conducted experiments with buoyancy on Friday.

Joey (I miss calling him that. He decided on his fifth birthday that he wants to be called Joseph now) is able work his way through each of these curricula in only an hour and a half each day. This leaves the rest of the day free for whatever he wants to do, and it is incredible how much learning occurs during that time.

While I am writing this, Joseph just came over to me and asked if we would start school now. How awesome is that?

Last night I read the article about Slow Teaching on the class Moodle, and I realized this morning that I am watching it happen right before my eyes with our son.

I have my wife to thank for this. She is an incredible friend and spouse, and a wonderful mother and teacher. She is the brains and the brawn behind our homeschooling. Laryssa is a certified elementary ed teacher, and has a Master’s degree as a reading specialist. Today, while I am home with the kids, she is substitute teaching in a second grade classroom in Seaside. However, most days she stays home and teaches our kids.

Thank you, Laryssa. Thank you for investing in our children and giving them this comfort and autonomy. Thank you for the love and attention you pour into them. I see them happy and flourishing, learning what they want at their own pace, as well as learning what they “need to” for their grade level.

For this, and a myriad of other reasons, I am unbelievably blessed to be your husband. You are amazing. I love you.

My experience at DLI

Last Monday I had the opportunity to observe a Russian language class at DLI. The opportunity fell into my lap because originally I intended to observe Valentina Freeman’s 300-level class at MIIS but I waited too long and all that was left to observe was her administer tests to her students. Luckily, it turned out that she used to head the Russian Department at DLI and she put me in contact with one of the instructors there. The instructor’s name is Daniel Shatsman and he is originally from St. Petersburg. He told me that the Defense Language Institute trains cryptologic linguists who will be responsible for identifying foreign communications using various forms of technology. The duties of the students once they graduate will be identifying and analyzing foreign communications, providing translation expertise to analysts, and transcribing and translating foreign communications. Daniel also indicated that after graduation the students sometimes perform the role of military attachés in foreign countries. Mr. Schatsman teaches geography in Russian to intermediate level Russian language students. He told me that the course covers most of the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and ends with Russia itself.

Mr. Schatsman told me that the course is designed to acquaint the students with geographical terminology in Russian. The course is designed to allow students the opportunity to learn about former soviet bloc countries and to give them the chance to discuss these topics in class. Mr. Schatsman also told me that his course is more relaxed in comparison to other courses in that it there is less homework and students are not required to memorize endless amounts of vocabulary.

The class was made up of five U.S. army soldiers. The students were intermediate level Russian language learners. There were two females and three males. One of the females was of Belarussian decent and so was one of the males. Before Mr. Schatsman told me about this fact, I thought that the two soldiers were potentially of Russian decent because they participated the most during class and spoke Russian very well. The teacher told me that their parents were from Belarus and that they speak Belarussian, which is similar to Russian, at home with their parents. He also told me that the other three students participate orally far less than the two soldiers of Belarussian decent do but that the other three students understand Russian very well.

One thing I noticed was that I did not hear the other the students say anything in Russian during class. On one occasion, when the teacher asked the students the meaning of a Russian word, an older male soldier answered in English. I noticed this type of phenomenon in my Russian classes at MIIS as well. Sometimes in my Russian classes at MIIS, there is a tendency for the more advanced students to hold the floor more often than the less proficient students. Also on this occasion, it may just be that my presence made some of the other students hesitant to speak or they simply were not in the mood.

The topic of discussion was the country of Uzbekistan and various aspects concerning its geography and domestic politics. The majority of classroom time was devoted to scandals surrounding Gulnara Islomovna Karimova, the daughter of the president of Uzbekistan. Mr. Schatsman showed the class various video excerpts of interviews with Gulnara Karimova. Before showing the video excerpts, the teacher recounted that Gulnara Karimova graduated from Harvard, has worked as a diplomat, businesswoman, professor and even a pop singer. She is now on house arrest after a European Investigative Committee reported that the president’s daughter had taken billions of dollars in bribes from various Russian and Scandinavian companies seeking lucrative business contracts in Uzbekistan. Mr. Schatsman showed the class humorous music videos where Gulnara Karimova sings pop songs in English. He also showed the class videos of what appeared to be made to order interviews with Ms. Gulnara basically describing how wonderful she is. I heard a lot of chuckling from the students while we watched these videos. We also watched a portion of a Russian documentary program that talked about how and why the Aral Sea in Uzbekistan is slowly disappearing.

During all the videos, Mr. Statesman would periodically stop the video and ask the class what certain words mean. While watching an excerpt from a Russian news program that reported on the scandal surrounding Karimova’s house arrest, Mr. Schatsman asked what the term наследница престола (inheritor of the throne) means. The male soldier of Belarussian decent was the first to answer by explaining what the term meant in Russian. An older male soldier provided an English translation of the term, which was quite impressive. I was impressed by this because words like throne are uncommon and the only reason I know the word for throne in Russian is because I sometimes watch Game of Thrones in Russian with my wife. Another term that the teacher asked the meaning of was ртуть (mercury/quicksilver). After being asked the meaning of this word, all the students in the class immediately answered that the answer was mercury. Again, very impressive. This word came up because Karimova claimed on Twitter that someone had try to poison her with mercury.

The techniques that Mr. Daniel Schatsman employed in order to teach the Russian language class were very similar to techniques employed by my Russian professor, Anna Vassilieva. The class was entirely content based and avoided the use of textbooks or other academic material. I personally enjoy the content-based approach but I do see the need for structured lessons that use textbooks as well. I’m sure that the students receive plenty of formal textbook instruction in their other classes and as I indicated earlier, Mr. Schatsman’s geography class is intended to give the students a break from the pressures of the other more academically intensive Russian classes.

I really feel fortunate that I had the opportunity to observe a Russian language class at DLI. After graduating from MIIS, I feel that environments like DLI would be the most suitable for me. Mr. Schatsman was very accommodating and he offered me the opportunity to return anytime I would like and I am grateful for that. Unfortunately, because I needed to conduct the observation as soon as possible, I did not have the luxury of picking a lesson that was a bit more interactive. Despite this, I was very impressed with the way in which the class was conducted and I will most likely employ similar content-based techniques when I teach get the opportunity to teach Russian someday.

Sergio

informal observation #2

I went to Stevenson School’s Carmel campus to observe a third grade Chinese class. The third graders take the Chinese class once a week and are at entry level. The teacher, Sisi, created a lot of attention getters herself, which were not only creative but also quite useful to manage a class with twenty eight to nine year old kids. Third graders get bored easily during the class, so Sisi arranged all activities perfectly. She put song singing after students finishing writing handouts on their own; she asked the class to form a circle on the carpet, after they danced and did some stretching with Chinese slogans with her; she also asked the students to take turns answering her question, just to make sure everybody did participate the class and no one was being neglected. It’s very inspiring and enlightening to observe such a well-organized third grade class. A teacher’s confidence and presence matter a lot when leading a class of small kids, because children “observe” their teacher first, and then respond correspondingly. When teaching a class of third grade students, it’s always important for the teacher to focus on the ultimate goal of teaching (like what are the three major grammar rules that these students are supposed to know at the end of today’s class?) other than paying too much to the details (like not every one of the students raised their to participate the class, some spaced out and some were talking to their peers). A confident teacher should always teach at his or her own pace.

 

-Chung-Hui Kim Liao

English Thrü Music: A Project Based Approach

Class Group Activity for Project Based Instruction: Observation of in-class demonstration
1. Defining Terms – The groups were given envelopes with definitions and terms relating to project based instruction. Some examples include, task, lesson plan, unit plan, syllabus, etc.
2. Sorting Projects– We looked at examples of different projects and decided if they would fit as an in-class project, and in-class and community project, or a community project.
3. Selecting Appropriate Projects/ Apples to Apples: Project based learning – Given a set of parameters describing the students in a class and what their strengths and weaknesses were, we had to select from a pile a project that would best suit the situation.
4. Planning a Project – We reviewed the terms and project ideas from the previous activities and decided on a context to plan a project based syllabus (either unit based or course based). We had to decide on the students’ proficiency level, their needs and interests, and the focus of the course. On a large piece of paper, we planned the syllabus and noted the main activities and outcomes at each stage. This was a great opportunity to bounce ideas off one another and create a cohesive course design (a nice intro to curriculum design!)
5. Group Presentation – Each group presented their poster discussing the type of project (Unit based or Course based), describing the context and level of the students, and the specific components within the syllabus. Each syllabus design was unique in the topics covered and their context.

image1 (1)

~ Our project is designed for an intermediate ESL class. The students are motivated by music and using social media. Incorporated into learning English through studying musical genres is a functional aspect focused on being a consumer (buying concert tickets and organizing transportation to a concert) and on promoting a music event (designing promotional materials that include the essential information). The students also have the opportunity to engage with the community by conducting interviews about music preferences and have the option to use social media for their final project, which is to promote a concert or other music related event.

  English Thrü Music Composition and Accent: An Arpeggiated Ascent
  Unit/ Topic

Tasks/Assignments

Week 1 An Historical Survey of World Music

Short written report: students choose topic (musician, composer, singer, etc.)

DUE: End of week 3

Week 2 Continue with Historical Survey   discuss course syllabus and project deadlines
Week 3 English in Use: buying tickets, finding venues, arranging transportation  
Week 4  

Discuss oral interview guidelines

DUE: End of week 6

Week 5 Sweuite (Sweet/Suite) Street Beats: Interviews about music  
Week 6 Music and Media: Programs & publicity in preparation for week 7

Begin final presentation: Program Design

DUE: End of week 9

Week 7 Continue with Programs and Publicity  
Week 8 THE CONCERT  
Week 9 Final Presentation/ Magnum Opus  

Post by: Catherine Purdy, Phil Martin, Aaron Ensman

Bay View Academy Visit

Sally Coons and Catherine Purdy

This is an observation and reflection on the planning process for the Bay View language lesson on November 13, 2015. We were introduced to this assignment early in the semester. We had an opportunity to talk with third semester students about their experiences with this last year, and that was the most helpful part of our preparation process. We watched a video made by past students about their reactions to language teaching to young learners. We worked in class on our lesson plan and met with another teaching team to hear about each others’ plans.

We think that it would have been helpful to use one of the planning periods to discuss co-teaching methods. We both have had extensive co-teaching experience, and we know that planning for co-teaching can be very difficult, especially for teachers with little experience. Even with previous experience, we forgot to discuss what our specific roles would be during each part of the lesson. We were able during the break between the two lessons to discuss how to improve our second lesson. One of the things we talked about was our roles. There are many different ways to plan for co-teaching, such as choosing a T1 and T2 for the whole lesson, or assigning T1 and T2 roles for each activity.

On reflection, we feel that teaching the language lesson was most beneficial for students with no or little prior teaching experience. For us, it was a nice opportunity to get back into the classroom and practice some of the precepts that we have been learning about in class.

Screen%20Shot%202015-11-23%20at%203.46.46%20PMScreen%20Shot%202015-11-23%20at%203.46.57%20PMScreen%20Shot%202015-11-23%20at%203.47.09%20PM

Pedagogical Repertoire: A Collaborative Compelation

Below are 16 pedagogical tasks that Sara, Catherine, Sally and Annabelle wrote and compiled together to make an in depth pedagogical repertoire. We hope you all find it helpful!

Coffee or Tea?

discussing tastes

Level: elementary/intermediated

Learner outcomes: group cohesion, sharing personal experiences,  expressing feelings and preferences, simple present, like + gerund.

Procedure: This activity allows students to break out of their normal groups and work with new classmates. The teacher will draw a matrix on the blackboard like this:

I prefer
coffee
tea
beer
 
 
wine
 
 

The teacher can choose any two pairs for the matrix, for example, cats and dogs, summer and winter. Any category that is appropriate for the age and grade level and which is likely to split the students. Students should place themselves in the matrix by their preferences, and each matrix will be assigned to a different corner of the classroom.

Within their groups, the students can discuss several topics. If the groups are too big, students can decide how to split themselves into smaller groups based on more specific preferences (for example, what kind of coffee or tea). If the students are beginners, they can simply have a conversation about other preferences they have in common. A third idea is to have the students practice the recognition of categories by having them in groups make a list of things that everyone in the group likes. The group members should then arrange them in categories.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. 69-70

Making ends meet

combining sentence halves

Level: elementary/intermediate

Learner outcomes: cooperation, creativity, sentence structure, conditionals

“This activity requires students to rethink their ideas and try to reshape them so that they match their partners’. It may also provide useful practice in conditionals.

Procedure: Divide the class into two equal groups. Write a conditional sentence on the blackboard, marking the ‘if clause’ and the ‘result clause’. Then, ask students to work on their own and write three to five half sentences, students in one group writing if clauses, those in the other group writing result clauses. When they have finished, ask them to find a partner from the other group, look at the sentence halves they have, and try to put together meaningful sentences. They can make any necessary changes and create some amusing or unusual combinations, as long as they can explain the situation they had in mind (see the examples below). You may follow with a whole class discussion on the criteria (of grammar and meaning) of matching sentence halves.

If I have time… …I’ll buy a new car.

If you read this letter… …he will go to work.

If you wash my car… …he watches TV.

Variation:

You may apply this activity to any other grammatical pattern that includes two distinct parts of a sentence, such as the simple past-past continuous contrast or sentences with temporal clauses.”

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg. 66-67

Making Rain

inventing a group ritual

Level: intermediate/advanced

Learner Outcomes: group cohesion, creativity,  oral fluency practice

This activity invites students to think about the role of rituals in their communities. Students will think of examples of rituals that they experience in their daily lives and rituals they know about in other societies. Students will then form groups and choose a function which is relevant to everyone in the group, for example, greeting, celebrating, or passing an exam. The group will then invent a new ritual for the group to practice and make a presentation about it for the rest of the class.

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy. Cambridge 2000. pg.73

Co-authors

writing a 50 word story in pairs

Level: elementary/intermediate/advanced

Learner outcomes: cooperation, personalizing input, vocabulary review, written fluency practice, patterns of reduction

Procedure: This activity is an opportunity for students to work together with a very strict structure. The teacher will read an example 50 word story to the students at the beginning of the class. Students should each pick four to six useful words from the most recent vocabulary test or text that they read. Then they should form pairs, and each pair of students will combine their list of words. Together, they will write a 50 word story using all of the words. An optional final step is for students to discuss in pairs or as a class how they divided tasks, made decisions, and chose a pair leader (if they had one).

From Ágota Scharle and Anita Szabó. Learner Autonomy, Cambridge 2000, pg. 67-68​

What’s important in a teacher?

Learning outcomes: Applying new vocabulary (adjectives), reflection on one’s own experience, focus on personal learning goals

Procedure: Instructor writes the word “teacher” on the board and asks the learners to think of words or phrases that come to mind. The teacher then divides the board into two columns, one labeled “good” and one labeled “bad.” The learners are now asked to think of specific words or phrases that fall into either category and they are jotted down under either column. After the students have had time to share, they are given a list of positive adjectives that could be used to describe a teacher they like/have liked. The students work individually or in small groups to circle the qualities they like in a teacher and have room to add more. They are split into pairs and tell each other what qualities they like in a teacher and tell their partner about a teacher they have liked in the past. At the end, the students are asked to finish off the lesson by completing the statement, “I think a good teacher has to be…” using their circled qualities. In addition, time permitting, a list of negative adjectives can be used and the activity can be done looking at the bad qualities of a teacher.

 

Deflecting questions

Learning outcomes: becoming aware of avoidance techniques, becoming aware of politeness, cultural awareness

Procedure: Give the students a list of questions containing some that are more impersonal (Ex. Where do you go to school?) and others that are more personal (Ex. How old are you?) Have them talk in a small group and identify which questions are appropriate to ask and which ones would be appropriate to ask, applying this to what they know about American culture and also applying their own culture. After each student has identified at least two questions that they would not like to be asked when first meeting someone, they class will reconvene. The teacher can start with a sample sentence such as “How old are you?” and write it on the board. The students will be asked what they think are some ways to avoid answering, given four categories: partial answers (ex. I’m in my 30s), jocular answers (ex. Old enough to drink), firm but friendly refusal to answer (ex. Old enough to know you shouldn’t ask me that), and confrontational answers (ex. That’s none of your business). The students are then split into groups and think of ways to answer the two personal questions they chose in each category. Once they have had a chance to do so, they walk around the class and ask these personal questions to each other, practicing their deflection strategies.

Making people laugh

Learning outcomes: becoming more comfortable in class environment, culture awareness

Procedure: The learners are divided into two groups, A and B. Group A have to remain serious throughout the first part of the activity and group B have a task of changing that. Both groups face each other and B has to try to make group A laugh using verbal means but it can also include gestures, body language, etc. After a few minutes, the teacher asks how many times group B could make group A laugh and what specifically made them laugh. They exchange roles and after a few minutes the teacher asks the same questions again. If the students have specific examples of what made their partner from the other group laugh, they can share that with the class.

Questions and answers about a famous person

Learning outcomes: using authentic materials/texts, formatting questions, using simple past

Procedure: The students are asked about famous people who they are interested in learning more about, such a musician, actor, author, athlete, etc. After getting suggestions from the students, the teacher writes all the names up on the board and have the class agree on one or two people from the list that they find interesting. For homework the students will gather questions about the famous person and some facts (new ones or some that they may already know about them). Next lesson the students share their notes (questions and facts) with a partner and see if they have similar questions or if their partner has the answer to any of those questions. Lastly, the class reconvenes and asks their remaining questions and let the students guide to the answers. When there are questions left over, either have the teacher look up the remaining questions or have students who are particularly interested in the famous person do the rest of the research for the next class. This activity can also be used as a segue to a lesson about a specific person, so the students might not necessarily have a choice in picking the target. ​

4 square organization task:

Learning outcomes: ability to notice similarities and differences, recall of vocabulary or key concepts, review.

Procedure: The 4 square tool is a graphic organizer that works similarly to a mind map. It is a box that is divided into four squares with a small box in the middle (at the intersection) for the topic or theme of the activity. The four boxes are used to group similar concepts and segregate less similar concepts that fall under the umbrella of the main theme of the activity. An example for this for our class could be: Theme (types of learning strategies); with box 1 about perceptual learning strategies; box 2 about cognitive strategies; box 3 about metacognitive strategies; and box 4 about affective learning strategies. For each box students could work individually or together to brainstorm key terms and concepts for each of the 4 strategies.

Stations- practicing language skills:

Learning outcomes: review vocabulary/sentences patterns, practice using different language skills, interpersonal and problems solving skills development.

Procedures: Stations can be a very effective use of time, especially in a class with a lot of learners. The idea is that each station has a designated area in the classroom with clear directions and an activity that learners can do relatively autonomously. It is imperative that each station have clear directions and that students’ have a general idea of what they must do at each station. The activities should take an equal amount of time. Using a timer that is projected onto the board to count down the amount of time for each station can be very helpful. With language learners it can be particularly helpful to have a stations that focus on these four skills (although there are certainly others available): a reading station, a listening station, a writing station, and a speaking station.

Treasure hunt-find your way in English:

Learning outcomes: review of sentence structures and vocabulary, practical application practice with prepositions, reading/listening/writing skills, problem solving skills.

Procedure: Treasure hunts can be very useful and fun, especially with younger learners. They are particularly helpful for review directions, object names (desk, table, chair, window etc.), and prepositions. A nice way to make a treasure hunt interactive for the whole class is to have each student find one clue. Once they’ve found the clue they must give it to the next student who uses this to find the clue after. To make sure students are engaged even when it is not there turn teachers can ask students to write down the clues in order by listening to their peers read the clues aloud. It is good to have some kind of reward in the final placement as motivation for the students to continue the hunt.

Do you agree?

Learning outcomes: students practice listening skills, students practice expressing (dis)agreement, review of past vocabulary and sentence patterns.

Procedure: This activity is useful for helping students practice their listening and speaking. It is also a nice way to break up the class with some kinesthetic learning. For the activity the classroom will need to be cleared so there is some space for running. There can be a yes poster and a no poster that are taped to opposite walls or the classroom can be divided down the middle with tape. The teacher (or one student at a time) make a statement for the whole class to hear. The other students run to the yes or no sides of the classroom to express their (dis)agreement with the statement. In their groups students talk together about why they agree or disagree.

Information Gap Activity: Maps (listening)

Learner outcomes: review of vocabulary and sentence structures, practice speaking, listening and writing.

Procedure: Give students identical maps, but with some road and building names removed. Map A should have the information that is not on Map B and vice versa. This could be done after a lesson teaching prepositions of place (on, at, across from, next to, etc). Collaboratively, but without showing each other their maps, the students must find out the missing names using questions like these:

What’s the name of the road across from the post office?

What building is on the left of the post office?

 Once the maps are completed, students agree on a starting point. Student A then directs Student B to a destination unknown to Student B. When the instructions are complete, the student who has been following the instructions should end up in the right place. Some instruction about giving directions should introduce this activity (go along, turn left, turn right, on the corner, go past…)

Adapted from Gibbons Ch. 6 on Scaffolding Listening

 The Picture Jigsaw

Learner outcomes: fluency practice, vocabulary reinforcement, listening, writing

Level: intermediate-advanced

Time: 20-30 minutes

Preparation: Have as many interesting pictures as you will have small groups in your class. They may be the kind of pictures that make a story or any kind of pictures. Try to include some pictures of people.

Procedure:

Divide your class into small groups

  1. Each group gets a picture
  2. The group studies the picture and students decide how to best describe it.
  3. Students put down the picture and describe it without looking at it.
  4. Students look at the picture again to see if they have forgotten anything.
  5. Collect the pictures.
  6. Students meet in new small groups. In each small group there should be a representative of each picture.
  7. Students tell one another about their pictures.
  8. While all students in the groups contribute, a secretary writes the story they create around the pictures.
  9. Place all the pictures in a visible place.
  10. A representative from each group reads the group’s story, while you re-arrange the pictures as they appear in the story if they make one.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

 

If I Won the Lottery

Learner outcomes: to teach present unreal conditional sentences and to give the learners a break in the lesson as they imagine something they might like to do. (The present unreal condition refers to a situation that is contrary to fact or not the case.  The speaker is imagining what would happen if the situation were different from what it actually is.) Reading comprehension and speaking.

Time: 20-30 Minutes

Procedure:

  1. Bring in an ad or newspaper article about the lottery to facilitate a group introductory discussion – how often do drawings occur, what amounts of money can be won etc.
  2. Read or tell a story about someone who actually won a lottery (news article).
  3. Have the students imagine that they have won the lottery and ask them to also imagine what they would do if they won the lottery.
  4. Share your own thoughts, using the conditional clause “If I won the lottery, I would…” This will demonstrate the appropriate sentence structure for the students to use.  Write it on the board so students can reference it.
  5. Invite the students to share with a partner what they would do and then share with the whole group.
  6. As follow up questions to the student responses to extend the discussion (ex: if a student says, “If I won the lottery, I would travel around the world.”, you could ask “How long would your trip last?” “What countries would you visit?”… you could also involve other learners by asking “Who else would like to go on this trip?”)
  7. Provide the learners with other conditional examples using if/would:
  1. If Bill asked Helen to marry him, she would say yes.
  2. If my brother visited us at Christmas, I would be very happy.

 

Pronoun Search

Learner outcomes: grammar review, scanning a text

Level: beginners-intermediate

Preparation: Choose a text that has a variety of pronouns in it, preferable a text that you have already studied with your students.

Procedure

  1. Explain that a pronoun is a word that takes the place of a noun. Examples: I, you, he, she, it, we, you, they, who, whom.
  2. In small groups, students find as many pronouns and antecedents (the word that the pronoun refers to) as they can in the text.
  3. The first group reads out the pronouns and antecedents they found in the first sentence of the text. As soon as a pronoun is mentioned, it is crossed off everyone’s list.
  4. The second group does the same with the next sentence. Continue until the text has been covered. The group that has a pronoun that one has found is the winner.

Variation: You can do the same activity with a variety of grammatical categories like verbs, adjectives, or nouns.

From Natalie Hess Ch. 5 on Working Well in Groups

Thanks so much and happy teaching everyone!

 Sara, Catherine, Sally & Annabelle

informal observation #1

I observed this middle school Chinese class in Saratoga. Students all can handle simple daily conversations and are capable of discussing important concepts from the textbook with the teacher and their peers. First, they talked about a short history between a famous writer and a musician. Then, the teacher randomly picked some students to answer her questions, while at the same time using a very serious way to manage the class, for some  students seemed to be restless in the second half of the class. Once there was someone talking and apparently disturbing her teaching flow, she would stop and just waited silently for the students to quiet down. However, this only worked sometimes (some female students did quiet down, but some male ones kept chatting).

The teacher provided the class with plenty of extra-curricular knowledge, by using the grammatical rules students were already familiar with, which made things much easier for them. Every student got at least one chance to practice with the teacher by answering question prompted up by her. The teacher connected the textbook’s core content and the extra-curricular materials well.

Reflection:

The way the teacher managed this class, such as just “looking” serious and harsh, waiting there silently without any actual actions, might be more effective with a senior class. However, the teacher seemed seasoned and skillful when leading her students to learn the basic knowledge in the textbook, and to explore extra-curricular materials.

-Chung-Hui Kim Liao

reflection-positives and negatives of language learning

Positives and Negatives

The four positives we chose today were: connection, intercultural competence, engagement, and accomplishment. Among the four, intercultural competence seems to be the most significant one. The ultimate goal of learning a language is to properly interact in the target language culture and having intercultural competence makes us survive this globalized world, while at the same times being capable of using languages as a key to open various doors—different aspects/fields of daily life.

The four negatives were: frustration, boredom, anxiety, and insecurity. Being aware of the fact that anxiety might “greatly influence a student’s language learning” is something a teacher should always keep in mind. Anxiety might sometimes stop students from learning actively; however, it can also be the reason that motivates students to practice more, and to push themselves to a higher level.

-Chung-Hui Kim Liao

Projects and H2H Communication

Our group of four was tasked with reaching a collective understanding of the important characteristics and dimensions of projects in a language course, and applying this understanding to planning a project for an imagined educational context.  This project plan was to be written on a piece of poster paper, specifying each step our imagined class would take towards the project’s completion. Our group was expected to present our project to the class, using our poster paper as a guide. My group distinguished itself from the other groups in two ways: (1) one of our members was a guest, a former MIIS alum and current director of a Los Angeles based English language program dedicated to helping international students transition to U.S.-based higher education, and (2) our group had nothing written on the paper when it came time to present the project. My goal here is to share the decisions my group made for the imagined educational context and project, and to describe the process by which these decisions were made. That our project never made it to the poster paper was somewhat embarrassing, but I am proud of the fact that our project and imagined context represented our shared interests and concerns regarding English language education.

Our imagined context was EFL at a university in a non-Native English (NNE) speaking country, specifically a grammar course made compulsory for students aspiring to be English language educators who met the minimum English proficiency requirements to gain entry into the university. This decision was not reached immediately. Our guest (whose contributions were greatly appreciated by me and the other group members) first asked us what contexts we expected ourselves to be teaching in upon (presumed) graduation from the M.A. TESOL program. This was an appropriate question to ask, because we would naturally be more motivated to create a project for a context in which we envision ourselves teaching. A fellow classmate and I both imagined ourselves teaching English language skills development courses at the community college level. A third classmate said that she would most likely teach grammar-focused courses in an EFL context abroad, a context in which she has previously worked and found to be challenging. I believe our group’s decision to teach in the EFL context was born of our empathy for this classmate’s experience and the challenges she anticipates returning to; the decision was also born of a shared understanding that teaching is full of challenges, and that we are better off facing challenges head on.

Like the imagined context, our group did not make decisions hastily for the project design. After much discussion, we decided the project would ask the students to create a newsletter (hardcopy or digital) for the university’s international cohort of native-English speakers (NES) who are also educators in training. This newsletter would inform the NES educators in training of the host country’s educational practices, past, present, and future. Because it is a grammar course, the newsletter would provide our learners with the opportunity to use the pattern-based grammar they would study throughout the semester. In order to make expectations clear, the teacher would provide the students with a checklist of the grammatical categories to be represented (e.g. verb tenses, passive and conditional constructions, etc.). The newsletter would be the product of all the students’ efforts (i.e. writing and editing articles, managing the placement/organization of the articles, overall design), and would thus foster peer-to-peer collaboration.  It would also foster communication between the classroom and the greater campus community.

Our group’s decision to have the students collaboratively create a newsletter-type item was made relatively quickly. We liked that it was collaborative and multimodal. Before going any further, however, our guest asked if the document would serve any real communicative purpose, smartly implying that it should. Had our guest not asked this question, I believe we would have unwittingly committed the error of designing a writing based-project that removes writing, and by extension, language, from human to human (H2H) communication. Understanding that the newsletter would need a real audience in order to have a real communicative purpose, and that this audience would need to be English literate, we imagined the NNES students attending the university and sharing an interest in education.

I recall holding a red marker in my hand while the group discussed the above-mentioned topics. If I’m not mistaken, others in the group were holding markers in their hands, too, or at least had markers within reach. Despite this access to markers, we did not commit ourselves to writing on the poster paper, not as long as decisions needed to be made about how the imagined project would meet our imagined students’ needs. These decisions mattered to us because our imagined group of learners had become, through our discussion, very real. Another, less romantic but no less real, reason why we did not use the markers was because we did not stick to our assigned roles (i.e. leader, scribe, announcer, “chaser”). Even though we failed to write on the poster paper, I would be happy to work with these individuals again, because they were effective H2H communicators, keen to communicate their own opinions and ideas, and keen to listen to the contributions of others. I do wonder, though, how we’d each respond to our imagined students hosting similar H2H discussions, and managing to not produce the newsletter.