<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of The Race: It Was The Best Of Times. It Was The Worst Of Times.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/08/09/the-state-of-the-race-it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-worst-of-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/08/09/the-state-of-the-race-it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-worst-of-times/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia Hassan</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/08/09/the-state-of-the-race-it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-worst-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-29706</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=13084#comment-29706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt, Campbell&#039;s Q2 estimates rely upon revised data, but he uses the initial estimate for Obama. This is potentially consequential, because real-time data are better for electoral forecasting, and economic data are prone to substantial revision. Eisenhower had ~.3% growth during Q2 in the first estimate and last year the first estimate for Q2 was 1.3, but the most recent revision is 2.5%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, Campbell&#8217;s Q2 estimates rely upon revised data, but he uses the initial estimate for Obama. This is potentially consequential, because real-time data are better for electoral forecasting, and economic data are prone to substantial revision. Eisenhower had ~.3% growth during Q2 in the first estimate and last year the first estimate for Q2 was 1.3, but the most recent revision is 2.5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
