<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Kristol Is Wrong &#8211; Why Campaign Strategy Is Overrated and Why Romney May Win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Drennen</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/comment-page-1/#comment-28181</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Drennen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12913#comment-28181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it will be close, and that it&#039;s hard to predict the outcome at this point. I just believe that the working class core of the Republican party will not turn out for Romney the way that he needs them to in order to win. I think that elections are about turnout, not persuasion, and I wouldn&#039;t bet against the Obama campaign winning in that regard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it will be close, and that it&#8217;s hard to predict the outcome at this point. I just believe that the working class core of the Republican party will not turn out for Romney the way that he needs them to in order to win. I think that elections are about turnout, not persuasion, and I wouldn&#8217;t bet against the Obama campaign winning in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/comment-page-1/#comment-28173</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12913#comment-28173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zach - It is still early to put much faith in our forecast models, but even at this date it seems clear that, barring a significant change in the economy, this election is going to be very very close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach &#8211; It is still early to put much faith in our forecast models, but even at this date it seems clear that, barring a significant change in the economy, this election is going to be very very close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Drennen</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/comment-page-1/#comment-28172</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Drennen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12913#comment-28172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Romney winning is a forgone conclusion, as the person above does. Whether or not campaign strategy plays a huge role, I think that there are a broad swath of people who make up the Republican base who just do not trust Romney and are less likely to come out and vote for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Romney winning is a forgone conclusion, as the person above does. Whether or not campaign strategy plays a huge role, I think that there are a broad swath of people who make up the Republican base who just do not trust Romney and are less likely to come out and vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cohen</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/comment-page-1/#comment-28168</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12913#comment-28168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Obama&#039;s loss is a foregone conclusion.  Despite much talk I think the difference between them may be slight.   Obama if reelected will face most likely a divided Congress and Presidents cannot accomplish much of their programs if elected.  One cannot argue that Obama did the best he could at the beginning of his term when their may have been a chance for a more agressive economic program.   He was incapable of doing this for a very complex variety of reasons, even if he had the character he was not as experienced as say Roosevelt for example.

While Romney is repugnant to me and I oppose all of his stated policies, I believe that he has a better shot of doing a better job than Obama.  If elected with a Republican Majority and if the Demcrats are incapable or unwilling to obstruct we may get the jobs program which Obama should have done at the outset.  In any event in such circumstances Romney will have the chance of doing something.  

If the Democrats obstruct Romney (like Hoover was obstructed during the Depression) then we might enter a great Depression and fear of Revolution or violence might become so great that the next Democrat will have a Roosevelt like opportunity.  This is the only sort of thing which allows great social change in the U.S.  The danger is that the U.S. will become a military dictatorship or the equivalent under social stress.  In view of our prior history this is not a zero probability event.  Also Romney&#039;s weakness is in foreign policy where his advisors may get us into multiple wars i.e. Iran.  Such a war will fix the economy at a cost of a world wide catastrophe.  In short Romney&#039;s election raises the probability for social change but carries considerable risk.  We have to go back to the 1950s or earlier when the public had even the illusion of knowing what the next President would do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama&#8217;s loss is a foregone conclusion.  Despite much talk I think the difference between them may be slight.   Obama if reelected will face most likely a divided Congress and Presidents cannot accomplish much of their programs if elected.  One cannot argue that Obama did the best he could at the beginning of his term when their may have been a chance for a more agressive economic program.   He was incapable of doing this for a very complex variety of reasons, even if he had the character he was not as experienced as say Roosevelt for example.</p>
<p>While Romney is repugnant to me and I oppose all of his stated policies, I believe that he has a better shot of doing a better job than Obama.  If elected with a Republican Majority and if the Demcrats are incapable or unwilling to obstruct we may get the jobs program which Obama should have done at the outset.  In any event in such circumstances Romney will have the chance of doing something.  </p>
<p>If the Democrats obstruct Romney (like Hoover was obstructed during the Depression) then we might enter a great Depression and fear of Revolution or violence might become so great that the next Democrat will have a Roosevelt like opportunity.  This is the only sort of thing which allows great social change in the U.S.  The danger is that the U.S. will become a military dictatorship or the equivalent under social stress.  In view of our prior history this is not a zero probability event.  Also Romney&#8217;s weakness is in foreign policy where his advisors may get us into multiple wars i.e. Iran.  Such a war will fix the economy at a cost of a world wide catastrophe.  In short Romney&#8217;s election raises the probability for social change but carries considerable risk.  We have to go back to the 1950s or earlier when the public had even the illusion of knowing what the next President would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/07/08/bill-kristol-is-wrong-why-campaign-strategy-is-overrated-and-why-romney-may-win/comment-page-1/#comment-28143</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 01:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12913#comment-28143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris - In line with your concluding thought, remember that national security issues loomed much larger in 2004 than today as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; In line with your concluding thought, remember that national security issues loomed much larger in 2004 than today as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
