<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama In Afghanistan: To The Victor Goes the Spoils</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/comment-page-1/#comment-27290</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12645#comment-27290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be clear, I did not say the speech was inappropriate - only that it could not be understood outside of an electoral context.  Others may suggest that is inappropriate, but my point is that political calculations must, of necessity, inform everything a president does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, I did not say the speech was inappropriate &#8211; only that it could not be understood outside of an electoral context.  Others may suggest that is inappropriate, but my point is that political calculations must, of necessity, inform everything a president does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Brown</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/comment-page-1/#comment-27289</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12645#comment-27289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not find the address that Obama delivered for unappropirate or solely related to the coming electorals. I do think that the war that has been hold against the talibans and al Qaeda has really lasted too long and him setting a timetable for the U.S military withdrawal is the best thing to do. My husband is an Air-Force sergeant and I am more or less, closely observing the described events, so can state that Obama did not exaggerated nothing from the stated facts. I can just hope that his promises for the timetable wont fail. Thanks so much for bringing these issues and insightful comments on them.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not find the address that Obama delivered for unappropirate or solely related to the coming electorals. I do think that the war that has been hold against the talibans and al Qaeda has really lasted too long and him setting a timetable for the U.S military withdrawal is the best thing to do. My husband is an Air-Force sergeant and I am more or less, closely observing the described events, so can state that Obama did not exaggerated nothing from the stated facts. I can just hope that his promises for the timetable wont fail. Thanks so much for bringing these issues and insightful comments on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/comment-page-1/#comment-27287</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12645#comment-27287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex,

I&#039;m not sure &quot;exposed&quot; is the adjective I&#039;d use, and I didn&#039;t mean to suggest that &quot;nation building&quot; is necessarily a bad policy. But clearly Obama wanted tonight&#039;s speech to remind voters that he authorized the killing of Obama, and that Romney had - in the White House retelling - cast doubt on the utility of focusing resources on this particular mission.  In terms of the larger electoral picture, however, I think the economy is likely to have a bigger impact on the presidential vote than will debates over nation building.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;exposed&#8221; is the adjective I&#8217;d use, and I didn&#8217;t mean to suggest that &#8220;nation building&#8221; is necessarily a bad policy. But clearly Obama wanted tonight&#8217;s speech to remind voters that he authorized the killing of Obama, and that Romney had &#8211; in the White House retelling &#8211; cast doubt on the utility of focusing resources on this particular mission.  In terms of the larger electoral picture, however, I think the economy is likely to have a bigger impact on the presidential vote than will debates over nation building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Garlick</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/05/01/obama-in-afghanistan-to-the-victor-goes-the-spoils/comment-page-1/#comment-27286</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Garlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12645#comment-27286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though we&#039;re back in the unfortunate business of nation-building, is Obama exposed to Romney on that issue? Since Mitt is presumably more hawk-ish than the President, will he have any leverage saying they should draw troops out quicker?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though we&#8217;re back in the unfortunate business of nation-building, is Obama exposed to Romney on that issue? Since Mitt is presumably more hawk-ish than the President, will he have any leverage saying they should draw troops out quicker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
