<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United Flight 93 and the Limits of Presidential Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/09/14/flight-93-and-the-limits-on-presidential-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/09/14/flight-93-and-the-limits-on-presidential-power/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/09/14/flight-93-and-the-limits-on-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-20384</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9695#comment-20384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob,

What a wonderful question!  In the post-Cold War era, I suspect most of us scarcely take note of the fact that Russia and the United States still maintain a sizable nuclear deterrent composed of bomber, ICBM&#039;s and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.  As I recall as an undergraduate I wrote a paper on launch control procedures, and seem to remember a dual key process that required the simultaneous action of two individuals.  But I think my focus was on preventing an accidental launch - not on disobeying the President&#039;s orders to launch.  I assume there are procedures in place designed to insure compliance with the President&#039;s directives, but as 9-11 showed, the human component is not always reliable.  Actions that require the compliance of a single individual to succeed are always going to be subject to some uncertainty, I&#039;m guessing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>What a wonderful question!  In the post-Cold War era, I suspect most of us scarcely take note of the fact that Russia and the United States still maintain a sizable nuclear deterrent composed of bomber, ICBM&#8217;s and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.  As I recall as an undergraduate I wrote a paper on launch control procedures, and seem to remember a dual key process that required the simultaneous action of two individuals.  But I think my focus was on preventing an accidental launch &#8211; not on disobeying the President&#8217;s orders to launch.  I assume there are procedures in place designed to insure compliance with the President&#8217;s directives, but as 9-11 showed, the human component is not always reliable.  Actions that require the compliance of a single individual to succeed are always going to be subject to some uncertainty, I&#8217;m guessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob Johnson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/09/14/flight-93-and-the-limits-on-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-20383</link>
		<dc:creator>bob Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9695#comment-20383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt,

Does the control of ICBMs have any of the weaknesses that appeared in the 9/11 crisis?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Does the control of ICBMs have any of the weaknesses that appeared in the 9/11 crisis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
