<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invoking the 14th Amendment: How Not To Solve the Debt Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-19627</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9171#comment-19627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Javier - since this is a cut and paste from another site, it&#039;s hard for me to respond.  In the future, submit your own comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javier &#8211; since this is a cut and paste from another site, it&#8217;s hard for me to respond.  In the future, submit your own comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier S</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-19540</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9171#comment-19540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... the president is obliged by the Constitution to uphold all the laws of the US.  If the Treasury were to default, he would have to make selective payments on debt interest, bond maturities and the like, hence omitting to make all the payments.  This would cause harm to many individuals such as SS recipients, Medicare-servicing clinics and the military.  Those folks could turn around and sue the President for selective enforcement of the law since it caused them harm, with good reason.  Precedent suggests the USSC would side with them.  The President can avoid such crisis by increasing the debt in order to guarantee the enforcement of the 14th amendment.  Since no one is harmed under that scenario then the President would not be legally liable.  Moreover, while possible, the House would be reluctant to impeach him since he would be acting to defend the US economy, which all sides agree.

Your tax argument is lame,  Europe has had higher rates of taxation and I do not see their wealthy escaping to heaven locations other than Phil Collins!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; the president is obliged by the Constitution to uphold all the laws of the US.  If the Treasury were to default, he would have to make selective payments on debt interest, bond maturities and the like, hence omitting to make all the payments.  This would cause harm to many individuals such as SS recipients, Medicare-servicing clinics and the military.  Those folks could turn around and sue the President for selective enforcement of the law since it caused them harm, with good reason.  Precedent suggests the USSC would side with them.  The President can avoid such crisis by increasing the debt in order to guarantee the enforcement of the 14th amendment.  Since no one is harmed under that scenario then the President would not be legally liable.  Moreover, while possible, the House would be reluctant to impeach him since he would be acting to defend the US economy, which all sides agree.</p>
<p>Your tax argument is lame,  Europe has had higher rates of taxation and I do not see their wealthy escaping to heaven locations other than Phil Collins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-19433</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9171#comment-19433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interpreting the 14th amendment to allow the president to raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval is tantamount to him governing by fiat. What next? Dictators govern by fiat.

Any increase in taxes will cause the unemployment rate to skyrocket. We could see 12% or more unemployment, as job creators let people go to cover the higher taxes. And it won&#039;t be just the so-called rich who will pay. The very wealth can simply export themselves and their capital out of the country. There are countries that would love to have the money of the US wealthy to create economic prosperity in their countries. Exporting capital reduces the tax base, and once the very wealth have left the country and taken their money with them, some other group has to fill in the gap. So the middle class gets it socked to them.

If congress were to prohibit the exportation of capital, there would be those who would find a way around it. There always is a way around a restriction. So, let the Democrats have their hefty tax hike to reduce the deficit, and let&#039;s watch the unemployment rate skyrocket. Lets watch inflation skyrocket. Let&#039;s watch medium size businesses leave the United States for China or the Philippines, while small businesses simply shut down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interpreting the 14th amendment to allow the president to raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval is tantamount to him governing by fiat. What next? Dictators govern by fiat.</p>
<p>Any increase in taxes will cause the unemployment rate to skyrocket. We could see 12% or more unemployment, as job creators let people go to cover the higher taxes. And it won&#8217;t be just the so-called rich who will pay. The very wealth can simply export themselves and their capital out of the country. There are countries that would love to have the money of the US wealthy to create economic prosperity in their countries. Exporting capital reduces the tax base, and once the very wealth have left the country and taken their money with them, some other group has to fill in the gap. So the middle class gets it socked to them.</p>
<p>If congress were to prohibit the exportation of capital, there would be those who would find a way around it. There always is a way around a restriction. So, let the Democrats have their hefty tax hike to reduce the deficit, and let&#8217;s watch the unemployment rate skyrocket. Lets watch inflation skyrocket. Let&#8217;s watch medium size businesses leave the United States for China or the Philippines, while small businesses simply shut down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-19429</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9171#comment-19429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack,

Alas, I&#039;ve stopped reading the Times since they went to a partial online subscription service, so I missed both Tribe&#039;s and Fish&#039;s contributions.  But, to your point, indeed, I want both parties to look into the abyss.  That&#039;s the incentive to compromise, isn&#039;t it?  When they see their own political survival at stake, they will deal. Not before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>Alas, I&#8217;ve stopped reading the Times since they went to a partial online subscription service, so I missed both Tribe&#8217;s and Fish&#8217;s contributions.  But, to your point, indeed, I want both parties to look into the abyss.  That&#8217;s the incentive to compromise, isn&#8217;t it?  When they see their own political survival at stake, they will deal. Not before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Goodman</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2011/07/09/how-not-to-solve-the-debt-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-19428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=9171#comment-19428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt, Stanley Fish said some of this in the NYT a few days ago. Laurence Tribe had an OpEd piece to the same effect.  But you are taking all of the fun out of this game of chicken.  Dont you really want both the Democrats and the Republicans to look deeply into the abyss?  If they dont reach an agreement, there will be a tie for the Darwin award this year.

Jack]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, Stanley Fish said some of this in the NYT a few days ago. Laurence Tribe had an OpEd piece to the same effect.  But you are taking all of the fun out of this game of chicken.  Dont you really want both the Democrats and the Republicans to look deeply into the abyss?  If they dont reach an agreement, there will be a tie for the Darwin award this year.</p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
