<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care, Baby Killers and the President: A Few Brief Comments from the Road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor Shaw</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-13940</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=7820#comment-13940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one of the big questions is the extent to which the administration learned anything from the yearlong process of passing the bill. Many presidents have struggled to figure out how best to wield their resources effectively, particularly in their first year in office. Obama may be helped by the fact that despite some missteps, he managed to bring a key campaign promise to fruition. Moreover, it is important for Obama&#039;s reputation and power prospects that pundits and politicians alike credit his hands-on approach and close coordination with Pelosi for bringing health care back from the brink. Although Obama may have been cautious to assert too much control at the beginning because of the legacy of Hillarycare, this past year may show him that he should be less hesitant to engage with Congress and use his pulpit to press for the next set of policy objectives. 

And that&#039;s where it gets interesting. Far from the impasse that some expect in an election year, I think Obama and the Democrats have the chance to get a lot done now that health care is out of the way. A financial regulation bill is likely to go to the senate floor, and it already has some Republican support (as well as a much broader public appeal). There&#039;s also Obama&#039;s push to reform No Child Left Behind, which falls into a similar category. Then there is the Senate&#039;s climate change/energy bill that also has shown signs of life. Health care may be divisive at the moment, but it will not be the only issue come November (I almost forgot - another supreme court nomination over the summer could make things interesting too). 

I guess my basic point is that the health care victory is not only important because it is an achievement in itself; it also may have forged a strong working relationship between Obama and the Democratic leadership and provided a model for approaching important but perhaps slightly less contentious issues than health care. Obama may lack Lyndon Johnson&#039;s knowledge of the ins and outs of congress or FDR&#039;s experience in the executive branch and as governor, but he is a talented politician with a demonstrated ability to adapt and defy expectations. Health care reform took a long time to pass, but it might have been well worth it for Obama if it provides his administration with a recipe for future success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the big questions is the extent to which the administration learned anything from the yearlong process of passing the bill. Many presidents have struggled to figure out how best to wield their resources effectively, particularly in their first year in office. Obama may be helped by the fact that despite some missteps, he managed to bring a key campaign promise to fruition. Moreover, it is important for Obama&#8217;s reputation and power prospects that pundits and politicians alike credit his hands-on approach and close coordination with Pelosi for bringing health care back from the brink. Although Obama may have been cautious to assert too much control at the beginning because of the legacy of Hillarycare, this past year may show him that he should be less hesitant to engage with Congress and use his pulpit to press for the next set of policy objectives. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s where it gets interesting. Far from the impasse that some expect in an election year, I think Obama and the Democrats have the chance to get a lot done now that health care is out of the way. A financial regulation bill is likely to go to the senate floor, and it already has some Republican support (as well as a much broader public appeal). There&#8217;s also Obama&#8217;s push to reform No Child Left Behind, which falls into a similar category. Then there is the Senate&#8217;s climate change/energy bill that also has shown signs of life. Health care may be divisive at the moment, but it will not be the only issue come November (I almost forgot &#8211; another supreme court nomination over the summer could make things interesting too). </p>
<p>I guess my basic point is that the health care victory is not only important because it is an achievement in itself; it also may have forged a strong working relationship between Obama and the Democratic leadership and provided a model for approaching important but perhaps slightly less contentious issues than health care. Obama may lack Lyndon Johnson&#8217;s knowledge of the ins and outs of congress or FDR&#8217;s experience in the executive branch and as governor, but he is a talented politician with a demonstrated ability to adapt and defy expectations. Health care reform took a long time to pass, but it might have been well worth it for Obama if it provides his administration with a recipe for future success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things That Happened, Things To Do&#8211;Week of 3/22 - Middlebury Magazine</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-13908</link>
		<dc:creator>Things That Happened, Things To Do&#8211;Week of 3/22 - Middlebury Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=7820#comment-13908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blog on presidential politics a must-read. As you can imagine, he&#8217;s been focusing on health care reform lately, and his analysis has been smart, insightful, and a great non-partisan source for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog on presidential politics a must-read. As you can imagine, he&#8217;s been focusing on health care reform lately, and his analysis has been smart, insightful, and a great non-partisan source for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bennett</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-13906</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=7820#comment-13906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the Stupak executive order, it&#039;s also important to remember that an executive order is second to law.  If a woman who wants federal money for an abortion (who is not already covered by the extenuating circumstances outlined by government funding of abortions such as a threat to the mother&#039;s life) sues the government for federal funding, it seems that the Supreme Court would uphold the language in the bill which mandates federal funding for abortions, thereby overriding the executive order.  I do not think Obama will repeal his own order after final passage of the bill, if it passes the Senate, but I think it can be easily defeated in court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Stupak executive order, it&#8217;s also important to remember that an executive order is second to law.  If a woman who wants federal money for an abortion (who is not already covered by the extenuating circumstances outlined by government funding of abortions such as a threat to the mother&#8217;s life) sues the government for federal funding, it seems that the Supreme Court would uphold the language in the bill which mandates federal funding for abortions, thereby overriding the executive order.  I do not think Obama will repeal his own order after final passage of the bill, if it passes the Senate, but I think it can be easily defeated in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2010/03/22/health-care-baby-killers-and-the-president-a-few-brief-comments-from-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-13905</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=7820#comment-13905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Matt, I feel the bill is going to be more significant politically than practically in the course of American&#039;s day-to-day. Regardless, Obama 2010 &gt; Clinton 1994, which should help the Dems in mid-term elections. At least this bill won&#039;t still be dominating the national debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Matt, I feel the bill is going to be more significant politically than practically in the course of American&#8217;s day-to-day. Regardless, Obama 2010 &gt; Clinton 1994, which should help the Dems in mid-term elections. At least this bill won&#8217;t still be dominating the national debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
