<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Wasn&#8217;t Always Like This: Sotomayor and Senate Polarization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=190#comment-3200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tarsi - It&#039;s difficult to untangle constituency influence from a Senator&#039;s ideology, because the one drives the other.  Senators win election because their ideology resonates with the plurality of the voting public, on the whole. So it&#039;s not the case that senators ignore constituency - in fact, they are acutely sensitive to constituency reactions.  But that&#039;s my point - they must gauge the overall constituency reaction - and not just that of Latinos. Too many pundits, in my view, got caught up in the idea that a vote against Sotamayor would lose Republicans support among Latinos.  Individual senators don&#039;t look at the vote in such terms - they look at their own core supporters first - the people who got them into office - not national trends.  These were individuals Senators, each making separate political calculations.  So its not that public opinion is irrelevant - you just need to identify the publics.  One final thought - I&#039;m not convinced that the Latino vote is as monolithic as commentators suggest; not only are their different Latinos - Mexicans, Cubans, Puerto Ricans - they also are monolithic in terms of voting (in contrast to AFrican Americans).  Remember, McCain won 1/3 or so of the Latino vote, if I remember my exit poll data correctly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tarsi &#8211; It&#8217;s difficult to untangle constituency influence from a Senator&#8217;s ideology, because the one drives the other.  Senators win election because their ideology resonates with the plurality of the voting public, on the whole. So it&#8217;s not the case that senators ignore constituency &#8211; in fact, they are acutely sensitive to constituency reactions.  But that&#8217;s my point &#8211; they must gauge the overall constituency reaction &#8211; and not just that of Latinos. Too many pundits, in my view, got caught up in the idea that a vote against Sotamayor would lose Republicans support among Latinos.  Individual senators don&#8217;t look at the vote in such terms &#8211; they look at their own core supporters first &#8211; the people who got them into office &#8211; not national trends.  These were individuals Senators, each making separate political calculations.  So its not that public opinion is irrelevant &#8211; you just need to identify the publics.  One final thought &#8211; I&#8217;m not convinced that the Latino vote is as monolithic as commentators suggest; not only are their different Latinos &#8211; Mexicans, Cubans, Puerto Ricans &#8211; they also are monolithic in terms of voting (in contrast to AFrican Americans).  Remember, McCain won 1/3 or so of the Latino vote, if I remember my exit poll data correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvdunlop</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>tvdunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=190#comment-3199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if I ever end up a betting situation on something like this, could you confirm my reasoning (provided I used the logic your classes imparted to me to come to the conclusion I&#039;m betting on)? Horray for the science in political science....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I ever end up a betting situation on something like this, could you confirm my reasoning (provided I used the logic your classes imparted to me to come to the conclusion I&#8217;m betting on)? Horray for the science in political science&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Garofano</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/comment-page-1/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Garofano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=190#comment-3197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/06/AR2009080601706.html

Dead on.  You should play Fantasy Congress/take out prop bets in Vegas/Ripton on these things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/06/AR2009080601706.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/06/AR2009080601706.html</a></p>
<p>Dead on.  You should play Fantasy Congress/take out prop bets in Vegas/Ripton on these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mittell</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/comment-page-1/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mittell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=190#comment-3196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done on your prediction of 31! I expect to see you wearing your t-shirt the next time I see you at a faculty meeting...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done on your prediction of 31! I expect to see you wearing your t-shirt the next time I see you at a faculty meeting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarsi</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/07/28/it-wasnt-always-like-this-sotomayor-and-senate-polarization/comment-page-1/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=190#comment-3193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly party affiliations and the ideological aspect are the main determinants of voting in this and some other more policy focused areas, but I&#039;m just curious about how constituencies factor into senators&#039; votes in this instance (if they do at all).  I would guess that some Republican senators who have large numbers of Hispanic constituents probably won&#039;t really see any fallout for voting against her confirmation in the long-run and therefore in terms of re-election prospects, public opinion is fairly irrelevant (or non-existent on this issue) - is that correct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly party affiliations and the ideological aspect are the main determinants of voting in this and some other more policy focused areas, but I&#8217;m just curious about how constituencies factor into senators&#8217; votes in this instance (if they do at all).  I would guess that some Republican senators who have large numbers of Hispanic constituents probably won&#8217;t really see any fallout for voting against her confirmation in the long-run and therefore in terms of re-election prospects, public opinion is fairly irrelevant (or non-existent on this issue) &#8211; is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
