<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parsing the Press Conference (Abbreviated Version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/29/parsing-the-press-conference-abbreviated-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/29/parsing-the-press-conference-abbreviated-version/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Nardini</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/29/parsing-the-press-conference-abbreviated-version/comment-page-1/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Nardini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=174#comment-3031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found Obama&#039;s press conference to be troubling, enchanting, surprising, and humbling.  Seriously, though, what was the point of the NY Times reporter&#039;s question?  One would think he would have wanted to take full advantage of the chance to ask the president a serious question -- instead of one that lends itself to fluff.  On the other hand, I thought Obama masterfully (and comically) navegated this four part query.  Well done!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Obama&#8217;s press conference to be troubling, enchanting, surprising, and humbling.  Seriously, though, what was the point of the NY Times reporter&#8217;s question?  One would think he would have wanted to take full advantage of the chance to ask the president a serious question &#8212; instead of one that lends itself to fluff.  On the other hand, I thought Obama masterfully (and comically) navegated this four part query.  Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
