<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independents and Obama: How Polarized is the Public?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=163#comment-2881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vijay, there is data on people&#039;s assessments of individual members of Congress, and if I get a chance, I&#039;ll try to dig it up for you. But, of course, the most obvious indicator is incumbency reelection rates, which hover at 90% or above for the House - a sign that constituents are generally pleased with their own members of Congress, if not Congress itself. 

Your broader question re: polarization in the public is a fascinating one, and there&#039;s no easy answer in part because political scientists aren&#039;t in full agreement on what the data show.  A very simple answer is that most Americans share a core set of values, and are generally moderate on most policy issues. However, when forced to choose between two options, or candidates, they may appear to be more polarized than they actually are.  So, for example, the presidential approval questions only allow you to respond as either approving, or disapproving (or &quot;don&#039;t know&quot;) of the president&#039;s performance. This can create the perception of a more polarized public than is actually the case.  I hope to expand on this point in a later post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vijay, there is data on people&#8217;s assessments of individual members of Congress, and if I get a chance, I&#8217;ll try to dig it up for you. But, of course, the most obvious indicator is incumbency reelection rates, which hover at 90% or above for the House &#8211; a sign that constituents are generally pleased with their own members of Congress, if not Congress itself. </p>
<p>Your broader question re: polarization in the public is a fascinating one, and there&#8217;s no easy answer in part because political scientists aren&#8217;t in full agreement on what the data show.  A very simple answer is that most Americans share a core set of values, and are generally moderate on most policy issues. However, when forced to choose between two options, or candidates, they may appear to be more polarized than they actually are.  So, for example, the presidential approval questions only allow you to respond as either approving, or disapproving (or &#8220;don&#8217;t know&#8221;) of the president&#8217;s performance. This can create the perception of a more polarized public than is actually the case.  I hope to expand on this point in a later post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=163#comment-2874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear Tip O&#039;Neill saying, &quot;All politics is local.&quot;

Dean&#039;s and Obama&#039;s mobilization efforts notwithstanding, isn&#039;t a big reason why presidents tend to be more moderate than the wings of either party that they represent more (diverse) people?

Presidents are more or less elected by the public (Electoral College mostly a frustrating curiosity), and Congresspeople represent a typically more-uniform chunk of the American population in their districts. Rep. Pelosi is an easy example: she represents most of SF, where the Greens are a viable party. There may be some who identify with Republicans there, but it really is a relatively uniform political will.

Matt, is there any data on how people think &lt;i&gt;their own&lt;/i&gt; Congresspeople are doing?

As for polarization of the public, I wonder how much it is affected by the media (whether mainstream or otherwise) more or less parroting the points of view of the &quot;two sides&quot; rather than really bringing thoughtful voices to bear on the subjects of Washington. Considering the fracturing of news sources - people can choose to get the news they agree with - I wonder how easy it is to &quot;unpolarize&quot; people with polarized views.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear Tip O&#8217;Neill saying, &#8220;All politics is local.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dean&#8217;s and Obama&#8217;s mobilization efforts notwithstanding, isn&#8217;t a big reason why presidents tend to be more moderate than the wings of either party that they represent more (diverse) people?</p>
<p>Presidents are more or less elected by the public (Electoral College mostly a frustrating curiosity), and Congresspeople represent a typically more-uniform chunk of the American population in their districts. Rep. Pelosi is an easy example: she represents most of SF, where the Greens are a viable party. There may be some who identify with Republicans there, but it really is a relatively uniform political will.</p>
<p>Matt, is there any data on how people think <i>their own</i> Congresspeople are doing?</p>
<p>As for polarization of the public, I wonder how much it is affected by the media (whether mainstream or otherwise) more or less parroting the points of view of the &#8220;two sides&#8221; rather than really bringing thoughtful voices to bear on the subjects of Washington. Considering the fracturing of news sources &#8211; people can choose to get the news they agree with &#8211; I wonder how easy it is to &#8220;unpolarize&#8221; people with polarized views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=163#comment-2869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry - the link to the Walter story wasn&#039;t working - it should be fixed now.

I should have the winner of the coattails contest announced in the next few days - I&#039;m giving others a chance to weigh in here!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; the link to the Walter story wasn&#8217;t working &#8211; it should be fixed now.</p>
<p>I should have the winner of the coattails contest announced in the next few days &#8211; I&#8217;m giving others a chance to weigh in here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=163#comment-2868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p.s. What about our coattails contest?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. What about our coattails contest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2009/04/11/independents-and-obama-how-polarized-is-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=163#comment-2866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Presidents possess much less influence than pundits and journalists would have us believe.&quot;

Yeah, well, shouldn&#039;t we keep this under our hats?  If the truth gets out, there will never be any decent candidates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Presidents possess much less influence than pundits and journalists would have us believe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, well, shouldn&#8217;t we keep this under our hats?  If the truth gets out, there will never be any decent candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
