<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Happening in Pennsylvania &#8211; A Third Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/11/01/whats-happening-in-pennsylvania-a-third-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/11/01/whats-happening-in-pennsylvania-a-third-look/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnderstatementJones</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/11/01/whats-happening-in-pennsylvania-a-third-look/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>UnderstatementJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=66#comment-751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True enough - I think the Arizona and Georgia money is a &quot;bang for the buck&quot; bet - these voters aren&#039;t saturated by either campaign, so for a few hundred thousand dollars you can throw ads at the wall and see if they stick.  It&#039;s unlikely that Obama wins here, but data is sparse - if voters are more movable than expected, they could prove very good investments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True enough &#8211; I think the Arizona and Georgia money is a &#8220;bang for the buck&#8221; bet &#8211; these voters aren&#8217;t saturated by either campaign, so for a few hundred thousand dollars you can throw ads at the wall and see if they stick.  It&#8217;s unlikely that Obama wins here, but data is sparse &#8211; if voters are more movable than expected, they could prove very good investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
