<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Second Look at Pennsylvania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/10/28/a-second-look-at-pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/10/28/a-second-look-at-pennsylvania/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Goodman</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/10/28/a-second-look-at-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=62#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Rendel is not taking Penn. as a slam dunk either.  Maybe he knows the same thing that McCain knows and we dont.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Rendel is not taking Penn. as a slam dunk either.  Maybe he knows the same thing that McCain knows and we dont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshall</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/10/28/a-second-look-at-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=62#comment-665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oops, hadn&#039;t read &quot;analyzing the undecideds&quot; yet when I sent comment.  I guess to some degree you agree although maybe not enough for it to make a difference in the final outcome?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, hadn&#8217;t read &#8220;analyzing the undecideds&#8221; yet when I sent comment.  I guess to some degree you agree although maybe not enough for it to make a difference in the final outcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshall</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/10/28/a-second-look-at-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=62#comment-664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found an interesting article thru RCP on Monday and was wondering what you thought of it: http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/27/undecideds/

General idea is that the new Bradley effect is that &quot;undecided&quot; is the way in which voters refusing to vote for the black candidate avoid looking racist.  Looking at last-minute polls and final election results of 6 congressional in 2006 showed that 80%+ of undecides actually break for white candidate.

And given the number of undecideds in battleground states, this could easily lose the electoral college...

Hype or legit idea?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found an interesting article thru RCP on Monday and was wondering what you thought of it: <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/27/undecideds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/27/undecideds/</a></p>
<p>General idea is that the new Bradley effect is that &#8220;undecided&#8221; is the way in which voters refusing to vote for the black candidate avoid looking racist.  Looking at last-minute polls and final election results of 6 congressional in 2006 showed that 80%+ of undecides actually break for white candidate.</p>
<p>And given the number of undecideds in battleground states, this could easily lose the electoral college&#8230;</p>
<p>Hype or legit idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
