<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Friday&#8217;s debate be a game-changer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/</link>
	<description>A NonPartisan Analysis of Presidential Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain Steps Up, Debate at 9PM tonight! &#171; Midd Blog</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Steps Up, Debate at 9PM tonight! &#171; Midd Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=31#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] And check out Prof. Dickenson&#8217;s reasoning on &#8220;Will Friday Night&#8217;s Debate Be a Game-Changer?&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And check out Prof. Dickenson&#8217;s reasoning on &#8220;Will Friday Night&#8217;s Debate Be a Game-Changer?&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor Shaw</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=31#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The electoral graph is on  electoral-vote.com. I tried to post the link, but I don&#039;t think it worked.  

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/ec_graph-2008.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The electoral graph is on  electoral-vote.com. I tried to post the link, but I don&#8217;t think it worked.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/ec_graph-2008.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/ec_graph-2008.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor Shaw</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=31#comment-44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite electoral vote graph has changed significantly in the past couple of days:



It&#039;s too early to tell for sure, but it looks like things are settling a bit and returning to the pre-convention state of the race. 

Makes a strong case for the &quot;fundamentals of the race&quot; analysis of this election, especially because the polls, viewed as a whole, have shown remarkable consistency this year, in contrast to 2004. McCain still has a very steep hill to climb, particularly if the economy is the main issue on voters&#039; minds. 

It seems to me that a McCain victory is going to require some sort of game-changer that significantly alters the race before election day. I&#039;ll admit, albeit grudgingly, that picking Palin was a real coup for McCain. It&#039;s hard to deny if you look at the polling evidence you presented as well as the nationwide and state polls after the Republican Convention. The only thing I might add is that now, having seen how effective his choice has been (at least momentarily), McCain might be wishing he had waited to announce her as his VP choice a little closer to the election! 

There are still many opportunities for the race to change dramatically, but time is running out. Do you think McCain can really afford to gamble with tonight&#039;s presidential debate, especially when polls show that voters overwhelmingly want it to happen? Or, does Obama&#039;s recent surge in the polls justify nearly any tactic, however risky, that changes things up and prevents the race from becoming static?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite electoral vote graph has changed significantly in the past couple of days:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too early to tell for sure, but it looks like things are settling a bit and returning to the pre-convention state of the race. </p>
<p>Makes a strong case for the &#8220;fundamentals of the race&#8221; analysis of this election, especially because the polls, viewed as a whole, have shown remarkable consistency this year, in contrast to 2004. McCain still has a very steep hill to climb, particularly if the economy is the main issue on voters&#8217; minds. </p>
<p>It seems to me that a McCain victory is going to require some sort of game-changer that significantly alters the race before election day. I&#8217;ll admit, albeit grudgingly, that picking Palin was a real coup for McCain. It&#8217;s hard to deny if you look at the polling evidence you presented as well as the nationwide and state polls after the Republican Convention. The only thing I might add is that now, having seen how effective his choice has been (at least momentarily), McCain might be wishing he had waited to announce her as his VP choice a little closer to the election! </p>
<p>There are still many opportunities for the race to change dramatically, but time is running out. Do you think McCain can really afford to gamble with tonight&#8217;s presidential debate, especially when polls show that voters overwhelmingly want it to happen? Or, does Obama&#8217;s recent surge in the polls justify nearly any tactic, however risky, that changes things up and prevents the race from becoming static?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=31#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCain&#039;s general strategy is clear: the economic crisis has strengthened Obama&#039;s hand by refocusing voter attention on the fundamental issues, particularly the economy.  It also, not incidentally, reminded Obama that attacking Palin on inexperience is a losing issue, and thus got him back on message.  I haven&#039;t finished crunching the numbers, but my preliminary finding is that the economic meltdown has bumped Obama&#039;s survey numbers up.  McCain needs to make sure this isn&#039;t a permanent bump and therefore is not inclined to let Obama own this issue.  Strategically, then, I think this is a good move by McCain, although it is too early to see how this is going to play out.  He will be attacked by Obama&#039;s supporters for playing politics with this issue, and grandstanding for public attention, but in fact that is precisely what he should be doing if he wants to win this election.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s general strategy is clear: the economic crisis has strengthened Obama&#8217;s hand by refocusing voter attention on the fundamental issues, particularly the economy.  It also, not incidentally, reminded Obama that attacking Palin on inexperience is a losing issue, and thus got him back on message.  I haven&#8217;t finished crunching the numbers, but my preliminary finding is that the economic meltdown has bumped Obama&#8217;s survey numbers up.  McCain needs to make sure this isn&#8217;t a permanent bump and therefore is not inclined to let Obama own this issue.  Strategically, then, I think this is a good move by McCain, although it is too early to see how this is going to play out.  He will be attacked by Obama&#8217;s supporters for playing politics with this issue, and grandstanding for public attention, but in fact that is precisely what he should be doing if he wants to win this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mittell</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2008/09/24/will-fridays-debate-be-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mittell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=31#comment-42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what&#039;s your take on the potential impact of McCain&#039;s plan to delay the debates / suspend his campaign?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s your take on the potential impact of McCain&#8217;s plan to delay the debates / suspend his campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
