<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dream of a single library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/</link>
	<description>Reflections and musings on liberal education, technology, and networked information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Ellis</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/?p=5#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree we should form a partnership like CBB with similar libraries in our region.  Williams would be the most logical for us to start with.  Rather than combine our approval plans and alternate who gets the shipment, it might be better to expand and divide up the publishers for approvals and let faculty and librarians submit firm orders for those critical titles we didn&#039;t get but want in our own collection.  There should always be a role for faculty and librarians in selection.  There are too many small or specialized publishers to include them all and faculty/librarians can pinpoint the most useful titles so that money is conserved and good titles are selected (a recent comparison at Midd of approval vs. individual selection showed that in almost all categories the individually selected titles circulated more, despite most of these selections not being from the top approval publishers).  

However, there is still a delay in borrowing so I&#039;d love to see us go together on a e-book plan with a portion of our budget (could be with just Williams or with our whole NExpress consortium).  We&#039;d pay more per title to have the book be available to all, unlimited users, but between all of us buying titles, we&#039;d amass a good collection relevant for liberal arts colleges. (The Netlibrary experiment was a failure due to the wrong partners, 1 user at a time per book, and limitations of the NetLibrary platform).  But the idea was good. If done within NExpress it would be very easy for our users since they already use it for print materials and get frustrated when they find something that they can&#039;t access.  But we would need to spend equal (or weighted shares) of money.   As for the future, technology (the search tools) is still driving people back to the print (circulation of print books is strong) so it will probably be a combination of both for quite some time.  Much more could be said.  This would be a good brown bag topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we should form a partnership like CBB with similar libraries in our region.  Williams would be the most logical for us to start with.  Rather than combine our approval plans and alternate who gets the shipment, it might be better to expand and divide up the publishers for approvals and let faculty and librarians submit firm orders for those critical titles we didn&#8217;t get but want in our own collection.  There should always be a role for faculty and librarians in selection.  There are too many small or specialized publishers to include them all and faculty/librarians can pinpoint the most useful titles so that money is conserved and good titles are selected (a recent comparison at Midd of approval vs. individual selection showed that in almost all categories the individually selected titles circulated more, despite most of these selections not being from the top approval publishers).  </p>
<p>However, there is still a delay in borrowing so I&#8217;d love to see us go together on a e-book plan with a portion of our budget (could be with just Williams or with our whole NExpress consortium).  We&#8217;d pay more per title to have the book be available to all, unlimited users, but between all of us buying titles, we&#8217;d amass a good collection relevant for liberal arts colleges. (The Netlibrary experiment was a failure due to the wrong partners, 1 user at a time per book, and limitations of the NetLibrary platform).  But the idea was good. If done within NExpress it would be very easy for our users since they already use it for print materials and get frustrated when they find something that they can&#8217;t access.  But we would need to spend equal (or weighted shares) of money.   As for the future, technology (the search tools) is still driving people back to the print (circulation of print books is strong) so it will probably be a combination of both for quite some time.  Much more could be said.  This would be a good brown bag topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/?p=5#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I know, Vermont has one print-on-demand machine which is publicly accessible, at the Northfield Bookstore in Manchester Center.  Perhaps a destination for a little library field trip?  Check it out: http://www.northshire.com/printondemand.php]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, Vermont has one print-on-demand machine which is publicly accessible, at the Northfield Bookstore in Manchester Center.  Perhaps a destination for a little library field trip?  Check it out: <a href="http://www.northshire.com/printondemand.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.northshire.com/printondemand.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a dream of one library&#8230; : A blog @ all things LIS</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>a dream of one library&#8230; : A blog @ all things LIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/?p=5#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] meeting with my colleagues from other library&#8217;s in the northeast. The piece is called &#8220;The Dream of a Single Library&#8221; . I&#8217;m hoping this might serve as a springboard for conversations about our views on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meeting with my colleagues from other library&#8217;s in the northeast. The piece is called &#8220;The Dream of a Single Library&#8221; . I&#8217;m hoping this might serve as a springboard for conversations about our views on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kellett</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/2009/06/04/the-dream-of-a-single-library/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kellett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mikeroy/?p=5#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see you blogging again, Mike! 

I read an article a few weeks back about colleges in close proximity sharing public safety officers -- that is radical. Sharing books is much more logical, but it&#039;s important to factor in the environmental weight of less books versus more car/mail travel to get books places.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you blogging again, Mike! </p>
<p>I read an article a few weeks back about colleges in close proximity sharing public safety officers &#8212; that is radical. Sharing books is much more logical, but it&#8217;s important to factor in the environmental weight of less books versus more car/mail travel to get books places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
