<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Middlebury Blog Network &#187; forecasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs/tag/forecasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs</link>
	<description>Selected Posts from the Midd Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No, Political Scientists Are NOT Lousy Forecasters – In Fact, They Are Pretty Good</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/06/26/no-political-scientists-are-not-lousy-forecasters-in-fact-they-are-pretty-good/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/06/26/no-political-scientists-are-not-lousy-forecasters-in-fact-they-are-pretty-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Midd Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacqueline stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=12844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First Nate Silver. Now Jacqueline Stevens!  Stevens is the Northwestern political scientist whose op ed piece in Sunday’s New York Times  sparked more than a little debate regarding the role of government efforts through National Science Foundation... <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/06/26/no-political-scientists-are-not-lousy-forecasters-in-fact-they-are-pretty-good/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[First Nate Silver. Now Jacqueline Stevens!  Stevens is the Northwestern political scientist whose op ed piece in Sunday’s New York Times  sparked more than a little debate regarding the role of government efforts through National Science Foundation grants to fund &#8230; <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/06/26/no-political-scientists-are-not-lousy-forecasters-in-fact-they-are-pretty-good/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/06/26/no-political-scientists-are-not-lousy-forecasters-in-fact-they-are-pretty-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
