<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Middlebury Blog Network &#187; forecast models; 2012 presidential election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs/tag/forecast-models-2012-presidential-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs</link>
	<description>Selected Posts from the Midd Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Winner Last Night? Political Science!</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Midd Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast models; 2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=13791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a political scientist, last night&#8217;s outcomes were very, very satisfying. &#160;To begin, viewed in the aggregate, the structural-based forecast models issued by last September hit the two-party popular vote share almost exactly on the head, as of this moment.&#160; &#8230; <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[For a political scientist, last night’s outcomes were very, very satisfying.  To begin, viewed in the aggregate, the structural-based forecast models issued by last September hit the two-party popular vote share almost exactly on the head, as of this moment.  &#8230; <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/11/07/the-big-winner-last-night-political-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different Forecast, Same Result: More Political Science Models</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/10/29/different-forecast-same-result-more-political-science-models/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/10/29/different-forecast-same-result-more-political-science-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dickinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Midd Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast models; 2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holbrook and DeSart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/?p=13750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politico’s Dylan Byers created a minor dust-up in the twitterverse today when he posted an article that appeared to take a shot at the New York Times’  Nate Silver’s prognosticating skills. Byers writes, “Prediction is the name of Silver&#38;#8217... <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/10/29/different-forecast-same-result-more-political-science-models/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Politico’s Dylan Byers created a minor dust-up in the twitterverse today when he posted an article that appeared to take a shot at the New York Times’  Nate Silver’s prognosticating skills. Byers writes, “Prediction is the name of Silver&#8217;s game, &#8230; <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/10/29/different-forecast-same-result-more-political-science-models/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.middlebury.edu/presidentialpower/2012/10/29/different-forecast-same-result-more-political-science-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
