<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Middlebury Blog Network &#187; haidun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs/author/haidun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/middblogs</link>
	<description>Selected Posts from the Midd Blogosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Damascus</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/back-to-damascus/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/back-to-damascus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>haidun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Midd Blogosphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/?p=5554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to hear thoughts from more informed people about our new ambassador to Syria, where we are reestablishing ties after withdrawing in 2005 over the controversy of Hariri&#8217;s assassination. 
 <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/back-to-damascus/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to hear thoughts from more informed people about<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/world/middleeast/17syria.html?ref=middleeast"> our new ambassador to Syria</a>, where we are reestablishing ties after withdrawing in 2005 over the controversy of Hariri&#8217;s assassination. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/back-to-damascus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Iran Diplomacy</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/our-iran-diplomacy/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/our-iran-diplomacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>haidun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Midd Blogosphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/?p=5551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. is gearing up to slap new sanctions on Iran in response to heightened rhetoric about their nuclear ambitions (although the Islamic Republic will still not admit that it&#8217;s pursuing anything other than a civilian program) and another rebuttal of the nuclear-rod-swap-deal that would have taken some dangerous material out of the country and [...] <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/our-iran-diplomacy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/world/middleeast/17diplo.html?ref=middleeast">gearing up</a> to slap new sanctions on Iran in response to heightened rhetoric about their nuclear ambitions (although the Islamic Republic will still not admit that it&#8217;s pursuing anything other than a civilian program) and another rebuttal of the nuclear-rod-swap-deal that would have taken some dangerous material out of the country and established a nuclear relationship with France or Russia. </p>
<p>Russia joined France and the U.S. in signing a letter to the IAEA claiming that Iran&#8217;s increased enrichment and its failure to notify the agency violated UN resolutions and indicated dangerous progress. Russia has been reluctant to jump on the sanctions bandwagon, and, like China, as a permanent member of the Security Council carries a crucial vote. The last thing China wants to do, of course, is sanction the country that fulfills <a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/02/09/china_is_now_irans_top_trading_partner">11% of its energy needs</a>, and is seems less interested in honoring international regimes like the NPT. </p>
<p>In the meantime, a bill to issue U.S. sanctions on Iran has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/world/middleeast/29briefs-IranBrf.html?scp=3&amp;sq=iran%20sanctions%20senate&amp;st=cse">passed</a> in both the House and the Senate. International sanctions are generally preferred (that is to say, where sanctions are preferred at all), and acting unilaterally is less powerful, so we&#8217;ll see how negotiations with Russia and China go. Let&#8217;s watch how the Administration&#8217;s rhetoric is attempting to distinguish the Revolutionary Guard, the Islamic Republic&#8217;s militia that has led the crackdown on recent protests, as an elite and separate corps. <a href="http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/02/08/irgc_cofounder_predicts_final_action_against_iranian_government_soon">Some</a> are pushing for sanctions targeted against industries run or patronized by the Revolutionary Guard (they have a monopoly over much of the Iranian economy). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.middlebury.edu/mesmidd/2010/02/17/our-iran-diplomacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
