<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manager&#8217;s meeting notes, April 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2012/05/17/managers-meeting-notes-april-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2012/05/17/managers-meeting-notes-april-2012/</link>
	<description>We Bring Knowledge to You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2012/05/17/managers-meeting-notes-april-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-28044</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=29222#comment-28044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve taken several of these, including DiSC and I found them useful not only for understanding myself and my style, preferences, strengths, etc. but also for understanding others.  I think you are right to question how we&#039;d use the results - if they are just shelved, it will mainly just be useful to the person evaluated.  But if teams and workgroups share their individual results in a fun non-judgmental environment, I think it could help us understand each other better and thus work together better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken several of these, including DiSC and I found them useful not only for understanding myself and my style, preferences, strengths, etc. but also for understanding others.  I think you are right to question how we&#8217;d use the results &#8211; if they are just shelved, it will mainly just be useful to the person evaluated.  But if teams and workgroups share their individual results in a fun non-judgmental environment, I think it could help us understand each other better and thus work together better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arabella Holzapfel</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2012/05/17/managers-meeting-notes-april-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-28033</link>
		<dc:creator>Arabella Holzapfel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=29222#comment-28033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see that &#039;ladder of inference&#039; got some air-time in the management training. I first learned about it in 2004 and I use it all the time when I reflect about my attitudes and assumptions. It is one of the few things I&#039;ve learned anywhere about anything that I can honestly say I use every day. A pretty good description in 3 minutes is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9nFhs5W8o8]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that &#8216;ladder of inference&#8217; got some air-time in the management training. I first learned about it in 2004 and I use it all the time when I reflect about my attitudes and assumptions. It is one of the few things I&#8217;ve learned anywhere about anything that I can honestly say I use every day. A pretty good description in 3 minutes is at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9nFhs5W8o8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9nFhs5W8o8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Merz</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2012/05/17/managers-meeting-notes-april-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-27996</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Merz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=29222#comment-27996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: DiSC evaluation. These evaluations have been done before - DiSC in 1998 and a similar &quot;team management wheel&quot; measured by the &quot;team management index&quot; more recently. I do not believe that the results were ever used for anything. So is it really worth the cost to do this again? How will the info be used, in practice?. I suggest taking a close look at the usefulness of the ones already done in the management training - interesting to the person evaluated perhaps, but to anyone else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: DiSC evaluation. These evaluations have been done before &#8211; DiSC in 1998 and a similar &#8220;team management wheel&#8221; measured by the &#8220;team management index&#8221; more recently. I do not believe that the results were ever used for anything. So is it really worth the cost to do this again? How will the info be used, in practice?. I suggest taking a close look at the usefulness of the ones already done in the management training &#8211; interesting to the person evaluated perhaps, but to anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
