<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Area 51 Notes: 28 July 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/08/02/area-51-notes-28-july-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/08/02/area-51-notes-28-july-2011/</link>
	<description>We Bring Knowledge to You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Simpkins</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/08/02/area-51-notes-28-july-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-23796</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Simpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=26319#comment-23796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may also be a useful site as we proceed with these discussions:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/content/video.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/content/video.shtml&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may also be a useful site as we proceed with these discussions:<br />
<a href="http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/content/video.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/content/video.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McBride</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/08/02/area-51-notes-28-july-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-23792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=26319#comment-23792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree, Petar. I want to point out that MiddMedia is particularly well suited for this thanks to a lot of the work that Matt and Adam have done. When you upload a video to MiddMedia it gets converted to H.264 encoded MPEG-4 which is supported in Internet Explorer 9 and Safari 5, as well as WebM which is supported in Firefox 5, Chrome, and Opera. For legacy browsers (IE 7, IE 8, and Firefox 3) the MiddMedia Flash Media Server does the Flash video conversion on-the-fly. You also get a direct download link to save the file to your machine and watch it in a desktop media player.

Every user gets 500 MB of storage automatically in MiddMedia and the quota can be increased on request. The system also has support for groups, if you want to let multiple people manage a video collection. As &lt;a href=&quot;http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/07/21/enhancements-to-middmedia-video-hosting-application/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt recently wrote&lt;/a&gt;, you can now choose to store the video in it&#039;s original quality, 360p, 480p, 720p, or 1080p. The system also supports storing audio files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree, Petar. I want to point out that MiddMedia is particularly well suited for this thanks to a lot of the work that Matt and Adam have done. When you upload a video to MiddMedia it gets converted to H.264 encoded MPEG-4 which is supported in Internet Explorer 9 and Safari 5, as well as WebM which is supported in Firefox 5, Chrome, and Opera. For legacy browsers (IE 7, IE 8, and Firefox 3) the MiddMedia Flash Media Server does the Flash video conversion on-the-fly. You also get a direct download link to save the file to your machine and watch it in a desktop media player.</p>
<p>Every user gets 500 MB of storage automatically in MiddMedia and the quota can be increased on request. The system also has support for groups, if you want to let multiple people manage a video collection. As <a href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/07/21/enhancements-to-middmedia-video-hosting-application/" rel="nofollow">Matt recently wrote</a>, you can now choose to store the video in it&#8217;s original quality, 360p, 480p, 720p, or 1080p. The system also supports storing audio files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petar Mitrevski</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2011/08/02/area-51-notes-28-july-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-23791</link>
		<dc:creator>Petar Mitrevski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/?p=26319#comment-23791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: video streaming

The MPEG formats are the most popular ones today and can be used on the vast majority of computers, mobile devices and standalone video players [1]. In addition, to-date, the MPEG group has had the most success in standardizing audio/video formats [2]. Thus, any of the MPEG formats would be best suited for digital archiving. Of the MPEG formats, MPEG-4 was specifically designed to be streamed and to be extremely flexible: it provides excellent quality even at low bitrates (such as on mobile networks) [3].

So, in my mind, MPEG-4 is the format we should use for both streaming and digital archiving. If we&#039;d like to archive physical copies, then archiving to DV tape would also be a good option, as the DV format is nearly universal.

As for streaming, we would be best served by a streaming server that can support both flash and MPEG4 (such as MiddMedia). Converting from an MPEG4 video to a flash video is relatively quick as it requires changing just the container and does not require actual conversion.

Those are my thoughts...

Petar

[1] http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_videoformats.asp
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_Picture_Experts_Group
[3] http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/mpeg-4.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: video streaming</p>
<p>The MPEG formats are the most popular ones today and can be used on the vast majority of computers, mobile devices and standalone video players [1]. In addition, to-date, the MPEG group has had the most success in standardizing audio/video formats [2]. Thus, any of the MPEG formats would be best suited for digital archiving. Of the MPEG formats, MPEG-4 was specifically designed to be streamed and to be extremely flexible: it provides excellent quality even at low bitrates (such as on mobile networks) [3].</p>
<p>So, in my mind, MPEG-4 is the format we should use for both streaming and digital archiving. If we&#8217;d like to archive physical copies, then archiving to DV tape would also be a good option, as the DV format is nearly universal.</p>
<p>As for streaming, we would be best served by a streaming server that can support both flash and MPEG4 (such as MiddMedia). Converting from an MPEG4 video to a flash video is relatively quick as it requires changing just the container and does not require actual conversion.</p>
<p>Those are my thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>Petar</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_videoformats.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_videoformats.asp</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_Picture_Experts_Group" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_Picture_Experts_Group</a><br />
[3] <a href="http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/mpeg-4.htm" rel="nofollow">http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/mpeg-4.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
