<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big data: The next Google? Predictions from Nature Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2008/09/06/big-data-the-next-google-predictions-from-nature-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2008/09/06/big-data-the-next-google-predictions-from-nature-magazine/</link>
	<description>We Bring Knowledge to You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McBride</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/lis/2008/09/06/big-data-the-next-google-predictions-from-nature-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/list/?p=49#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next ten years will be able virtual reality visors, 3D worlds, and touch screens? Frankly, I&#039;ve heard this once or twice before. To quote:

&quot;As you browse you will discover interesting objects and you will be able to download the code to make those objects come to life, and behave on your screen or in a 3-D space in a way that an author or artist intended.&quot;

- Tim Berners Lee, 1995
http://www.elon.edu/predictions/prediction2.aspx?id=JAG-0610

(btw, that&#039;s a great resource for technology prediction history)

It seems like only yesterday that I was in Voter reading about how VRML&#039;s 3D technology would revolutionize the web by letting us build virtual cities in embedded Java applets, but it was really 1995 and I was in sixth grade editing my Geocities home page on a PowerMac 6500. It was, however, in Voter... or maybe the Science Center if I&#039;d already been kicked out of Voter that day.

To contribute, I think the &quot;next big things&quot; in tech will be things that the consumer really never notices. Our entire information superhighway (since I&#039;m on an early 90&#039;s kick) is still driven on an architecture planned around 50, or if we&#039;re feeling really wild 500, computers.

That DNS (website addresses), SMTP (email), and TCP/IP (how computers talk to each other) need to be redesigned from the group up has been a groan-worthy tech topic for at least a decade. I&#039;d be shocked and a little frightened if we made it another 10 years without major overhauls to each of these systems, which will require the ground-up recoding of much of the web as we know it. In my opinion, that we&#039;re even talking about making websites somehow easier for search engines to parse to extra metadata (the semantic web) when I can still pretend I&#039;m you and send a bunch of email as you, is a little sad. These changes might not be as flashy as Second Life, but they&#039;ll have far more impact on the folks using those flashy services.

To add to the gloom, I think the other major change that we&#039;re going to need to get used to is a lack of information privacy. Here are the people who know my social security number: the Federal government (one hopes), Middlebury College, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, ESCI: WPI&#039;s loan provider, Sallie Mae, Verizon, Adelphia, FairPoint, Comcast, John Chamberlain &amp; Assoc., MUHS, the National Bank of Middlebury, Key Bank, Porter Medical Center, EBPA, TIAA/CREF, and every credit card vendor known to man.

This is really nothing new. They&#039;ve collected this information over the last 25 years, it&#039;s just that they&#039;re now storing it in databases that happen to have web front ends, so I can log in an view all of the information they have about me. To those who say, &quot;So what?&quot;, I&#039;ll remind you that the ability to spoof an email address I talked about above is shocking news to most people. Fortunately, thanks to the new internet protocols I predict will be developed, I&#039;ll be able to access sensitive data about myself in high speed on my 3D internet goggles.

(btw, this would include biological data, which the linked article mentioned in what I&#039;d consider one of it&#039;s better segments)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next ten years will be able virtual reality visors, 3D worlds, and touch screens? Frankly, I&#8217;ve heard this once or twice before. To quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;As you browse you will discover interesting objects and you will be able to download the code to make those objects come to life, and behave on your screen or in a 3-D space in a way that an author or artist intended.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Tim Berners Lee, 1995<br />
<a href="http://www.elon.edu/predictions/prediction2.aspx?id=JAG-0610" rel="nofollow">http://www.elon.edu/predictions/prediction2.aspx?id=JAG-0610</a></p>
<p>(btw, that&#8217;s a great resource for technology prediction history)</p>
<p>It seems like only yesterday that I was in Voter reading about how VRML&#8217;s 3D technology would revolutionize the web by letting us build virtual cities in embedded Java applets, but it was really 1995 and I was in sixth grade editing my Geocities home page on a PowerMac 6500. It was, however, in Voter&#8230; or maybe the Science Center if I&#8217;d already been kicked out of Voter that day.</p>
<p>To contribute, I think the &#8220;next big things&#8221; in tech will be things that the consumer really never notices. Our entire information superhighway (since I&#8217;m on an early 90&#8242;s kick) is still driven on an architecture planned around 50, or if we&#8217;re feeling really wild 500, computers.</p>
<p>That DNS (website addresses), SMTP (email), and TCP/IP (how computers talk to each other) need to be redesigned from the group up has been a groan-worthy tech topic for at least a decade. I&#8217;d be shocked and a little frightened if we made it another 10 years without major overhauls to each of these systems, which will require the ground-up recoding of much of the web as we know it. In my opinion, that we&#8217;re even talking about making websites somehow easier for search engines to parse to extra metadata (the semantic web) when I can still pretend I&#8217;m you and send a bunch of email as you, is a little sad. These changes might not be as flashy as Second Life, but they&#8217;ll have far more impact on the folks using those flashy services.</p>
<p>To add to the gloom, I think the other major change that we&#8217;re going to need to get used to is a lack of information privacy. Here are the people who know my social security number: the Federal government (one hopes), Middlebury College, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, ESCI: WPI&#8217;s loan provider, Sallie Mae, Verizon, Adelphia, FairPoint, Comcast, John Chamberlain &amp; Assoc., MUHS, the National Bank of Middlebury, Key Bank, Porter Medical Center, EBPA, TIAA/CREF, and every credit card vendor known to man.</p>
<p>This is really nothing new. They&#8217;ve collected this information over the last 25 years, it&#8217;s just that they&#8217;re now storing it in databases that happen to have web front ends, so I can log in an view all of the information they have about me. To those who say, &#8220;So what?&#8221;, I&#8217;ll remind you that the ability to spoof an email address I talked about above is shocking news to most people. Fortunately, thanks to the new internet protocols I predict will be developed, I&#8217;ll be able to access sensitive data about myself in high speed on my 3D internet goggles.</p>
<p>(btw, this would include biological data, which the linked article mentioned in what I&#8217;d consider one of it&#8217;s better segments)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
