Course Discussion

This page will allow for a free-form discussion. Students should feel free to post whatever they like here: questions, comments, musings, &c.

15 thoughts on “Course Discussion

  1. Matt Joseph

    This article explains a new route the U.S. could start taking to change the detainment policies of the Bush Administration. We’re also seeing a case where the trial will be held in the U.S. in a civilian criminal court, and how a domestic legal system can impact an international issue. This is definitley a developing issue with hundreds of detainees statuses to be adjusted to the Obama Administration’s policies, so it will be interesting to see how the legal process changes over time. Lastly, is this case an example of where having a membership in the ICC would come in handy?

  2. Matt Joseph

    Hey guys,

    Some of you may have already heard about this, but the ICC has ordered the arrest of President Bashir of Sudan for war crimes and crimes against humanity, but not genocide. Here is the Times article.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/world/africa/05court.html?_r=1&hp

    It is the first time the ICC has ordered the arrest of sitting head of state, and as couple be expected, President Bashir doesn’t plan on cooperating.

  3. Christian

    The Spanish, specifically Baltazar Garzon, are at it again, this time looking to indict six Bush administration officials, including Alberto Gonzales.

    This NY times articles sums it up:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/world/europe/29spain.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&src=ig
    This Wall Street Journal Opinion piece is a response by John C. Yoo, one of the six officials:
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638439733558185.html
    This is CNN article that included an interesting quote by Yoo about
    lawyers not making policy:
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/03/29/gonzales.spain.gitmo/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

  4. Nicholas Kent

    As a sidenote to the discussion we had on Tuesday regarding whether or not there have been any secret treaties since the formation of the UN, there apparently have been. An example I came across is the 1947 Quadripartite pact signed by the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia regarding cooperation on intelligence matters, basically giving each nation unlimited access to all of the intelligence gathered by the other signatories. This treaty, which later evolved into the UK-USA Security Agreement, was apparently so secret that even Australian PMs weren’t informed of it until 1973…

    http://www.williambowles.info/spysrus/cia_australia.html

  5. Carlisle

    I got mixed up yesterday in class on Preemption and preventative war. Preemptive war is a more imminent threat, and preventative war is a little more remote. Both are illegal under international law, although the Security Council does maintain that some preemptive wars can be legal. President Bush tried to claim he was pursuing a legal preemptive war, but his policy in Iraq is likely better understood as a preventative war, which is a much further removed threat. Sorry for the confusion!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *