One of the putative benefits of Soylent, the brand new food substitute getting coverage in the NYTimes, Slate, and so on, is its environmental impact. Soylent is a nutritional drink, designed in 2013 by wunderkind and tech advocate Rob Rhinehart to solve the problems associated with food. In short, it takes too long to prepare, is too expensive, and takes too long to consume. In the video below, Rhinehart explains in more detail what Soylent is all about:
Soylent solves all of that. It provides (in theory) all the necessary nutrition you need in an easy-to-make drink for (potentially) less than the price of eating out or cooking yourself. Since it can be stored, it contributes to less waste; it does not require as much carbon emissions per milligram of protein as, say, factory-produced beef; and can be produced with all-organic ingredients. Environmentally speaking, what’s not to love?
And yet, I can’t quite get behind it. For one, what we eat is not simply dictated by necessity, but is a part of and influenced by our culture. We eat not just to input energy into a machine, but because the act of eating affects our mood – we place different signifiers on things like spiciness, texture, and so on. While Soylent is customizable, it’s not clear that it would ever approach the diversity of human gastronomy.
And, c’mon, what kind of a psycho would willingly replace this with Soylent?:
Second, I’m not convinced that Soylent is necessarily always the cheaper option for everyone. It may be only $3 per package, but that’s substantially more than it costs to make a pot of rice and beans (baller, if you do it right), or to buy an order of koshari in Cairo.
Finally, while Soylent’s claims to promote a good environmental impact are somewhat admirable, the environmental problems it putatively addresses can and should be addressed by other means. Why do we allow factory farms to overproduce poorly managed cattle and butcher them in appalling conditions? Why do we allow agricultural producers to mass clear land and plant monocrops? Why do we have all of this food waste, and over-processed crap?
Ultimately, Soylent seems like another unnecessarily hi-tech solution based on consuming our way out of problems we created by consumption. It speaks more to something gone horribly wrong in our society: so many people feel so hammered by time and life constraints that even the act of eating has become one more thing to shove aside in the mad dash to… wherever.