<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Thoughts About Maxes, Midpoints, Bands, and Levels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/2011/02/16/more-thoughts-about-maxes-midpoints-bands-and-levels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/2011/02/16/more-thoughts-about-maxes-midpoints-bands-and-levels/</link>
	<description>A blog devoted to administrative updates and their relevance for the College community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Nonymous</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/2011/02/16/more-thoughts-about-maxes-midpoints-bands-and-levels/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Nonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/?p=1378#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although a compensation policy has to address broad staffing needs, the revised staff compensation structure seems to be written entirely from the perspective of long-term staff.  While maximum caps are something an entry level or simply younger employee can plan around, they are an unacceptable glass ceiling for more recent hires and those in areas of specialized expertise that Midd requires.  What kind of incentive is this for staff with highly marketable skills, who&#039;ve patiently waited through a salary freeze, and who may have only newly-acquired 401 (k)s?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although a compensation policy has to address broad staffing needs, the revised staff compensation structure seems to be written entirely from the perspective of long-term staff.  While maximum caps are something an entry level or simply younger employee can plan around, they are an unacceptable glass ceiling for more recent hires and those in areas of specialized expertise that Midd requires.  What kind of incentive is this for staff with highly marketable skills, who&#8217;ve patiently waited through a salary freeze, and who may have only newly-acquired 401 (k)s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/2011/02/16/more-thoughts-about-maxes-midpoints-bands-and-levels/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.middlebury.edu/acrosscampus/?p=1378#comment-207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about some form of remuneration for those who will be capped - for example, no rises in benefit premiums for five years? Given that there are so few job ladders at Middlebury for staff, and therefore no chance of promotion (and higher salary), this could be a way to compensate for what will actually be a lower salary if benefit costs rise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about some form of remuneration for those who will be capped &#8211; for example, no rises in benefit premiums for five years? Given that there are so few job ladders at Middlebury for staff, and therefore no chance of promotion (and higher salary), this could be a way to compensate for what will actually be a lower salary if benefit costs rise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
